Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="OrlandoCuse, post: 4917084, member: 115"] I’m struggling to reconcile some of the computer models this year. NET and KP don’t seem to like SU much. We’re being weighed down a bit in KP because of his use of “Luck” which he rates us high. My guess is his luck factor is because we’ve outperformed his predictions, so he’s attributing it to some form of luck (I don’t think he should be factoring luck at a significant level. It may matter over a game or two but won’t matter over a long stretch of games). NET is a bit weird. I think a whole bunch of teams are bunched together between 25 and 90, and were skewing lower because we don’t have a Q1 win. I think it we start stringing some Q1 and Q2 wins together, which we will have the opportunity to do so based on ACC team rankings, I think we could rapidly rise up the NET rankings. Best thing about this year is we’ve avoided any bad losses and really shouldn’t have any Q3/4 losses this year which will go a long way. [/QUOTE]