Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 4939558, member: 1969"] I'd say that is more randomness than anything else. (although Pitt has an underlying factor that could also be responsible for this that impacts our ability to count as this as Q1 by season end - I'll do another post of that) I can't talk for NET as they don't give team values, but if we look at KP you can easily see how this happens, as some teams get closely bunched around a spot at times. Here are the ranking values of teams #66-#70 #66. 11.99 67. 11.56 68. 11.51 69. 11.51 70. 11.45 The gap between #66-#67 is larger than the gap between #67-#70. Depending where those gaps are you could see why a team jumps 4 spots after a result, and 7 spots after a similar result. [/QUOTE]