Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="CardiacCuse, post: 4944868, member: 6979"]
me too! look at the list of teams higher than SU in NET, though, its a lot more than just Alabama

[B]Auburn[/B] is 16-2 (great job) and they are 6th in NET...but guess what ? ZERO quad 1 wins! (0-2)

[B]Mcneese[/B] is 65th (4 spots higher than Cuse) - Zero quad 1 wins, 2-2 against quad 2

[B]Pitt[/B] is 1 spot higher than Cuse at 11-7 on the year

[B]Creighton [/B]is 14-5 on the year 6-5 combined vs quad 1 and 2...meanhwile SU is 4-5 combined in Q 1 and 2...pretty similar right? nope. Creighton is 11th, SU 69th. [B]Marquette[/B] is almost the same metrics.

[B]Mich St[/B] has a garbage record vs quad 1 and 2...yet in the top 25

[B]Gonzaga[/B] did wipe the floor with the Cuse...but guess what? ZERO quad 1 wins! yet 39 places higher than the orange at 12-5 on the season.

[B]Villanova, Texas AM and St Johns[/B] all have 7 losses on the season...and well above SU.

[B]Xavier[/B] is 10-8...and 20 spots higher than 13-5 cuse...meanwhile cuse has played a top 20 schedule in the NCAA!

I could go on...

Overall record should matter more...margin of victory should matter less

Obviously NET is incorporating KenPom...

I wonder if their algorithm is messed up honestly...I mean...who would really be smart enough to make sure it isnt???? highly possible that whoever is in charge of the NET is not that good at math, imo
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?