Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 4945967, member: 1969"] Generally the committee scrubs teams wins and losses closely for the final "x" spots as part of their subjective process. They are not going to overrate a win because its 49 vs 51, or shouldn't based on what they say. They have all weekend to subjectively scrub this stuff (I assume they are doing something all weekend) they are not going to go hard line on teams on the borders. You often also hear them use the term "Wins over fellow tourney teams or bubble teams" They use quadrants as a guideline to help them decide who clearly get in, and they are also relevant of course when comparing bubble teams... but its not a hard fast this team is #49 its great win, this team is #51 its not a great win. Someone could argue that offsets part of my point on Pitt above at that is fair enough. But I do the consequences of them falling out of the 75, and moving down to say 81 could be pretty severe on our resume. [/QUOTE]