Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="blust2i3d4, post: 4983041, member: 6140"] I think we can get to lower 50's if we go 4-0 and 2-1. The seeding has to be this way. 1 UNC 3 losses 2 Duke 4 or 5 losses 3 UVA 6 losses 4 Wake 7 losses 5 SU 8 losses 6 Pitt 8 losses 7 NC st 8 losses 8 Clemson 10 losses We need to even the loss earlier by Wake. Then by tie breakers we have higher seeding than Pitt and NC st because we swept them in regular seasons. Clemson has to have 10 losses, two more than us. So in the end we clearly have better resume than Pitt, NC state and Clemson. If ACC sends five teams, both Wake and SU go. If ACC sends four teams, we have better than 50/50 chance than Wake since they have three OOC losses on a very weak schedule. [/QUOTE]