Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SWC75, post: 2556577, member: 289"] This is my statistical summary of the 2017-18 SU basketball team in their post season games (the 2 ACC tournament and 4 NCAA tournament games) I will include the same numbers for the pre-conference and conference games for comparison as well as the totals for the season. Net Points (points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls; OE is “Offensive efficiency”: P-MFG-MFT; FG is “Floor Game”: NP – OE. Minutes are by number of games played, not games available to play.) CENTERS [B]Paschal Chukwu[/B] Non-conference: 129NP 25.3m 9.2p 9.6r 0.4a 1.6s 5.1b = 25.9+ 1.8mfg 1.9mft 1.9to 4.5pf = 10.1- = 15.8NP 5.5OE 10.3FG Conference: 176NP 28.7m 6.7p 10.3r 0.7a 0.9s 3.1b = 21.7+ 1.4mfg 0.8mft 1.7to 4.3pf = 8.2- = 13.5NP 4.5OE 9.0FG Post-Season: 55NP 27.0m 8.9p 10.1r 0.7a 0.2s 2.2b = 22.1+ 1.2mfg 1.5mft 0.5to 5.4pf = 8.6- = 13.5NP 6.2OE 7.3FG Total: 360NP 27.2m 7.8p 10.0r 0.6a 1.0s 3.6b = 23.0+ 1.5mfg 1.3mft 1.6to 4.6pf = 9.0- = 14.0NP 5.0OE 9.0FG Comments: Paschal has been pretty consistent all season. He blocked more shots in the pre-conference season against shorter teams, did better at the foul line after that and avoided turnovers. He committed too many fouls in the spot season but he seemed to be called for breathing on people. [B]Bourama Sidibie[/B] Non-conference: 31NP 15.4m 9.9p 9.4r 0.5a 2.3s 2.3b = 24.4+ 2.1mfg 3.4mft 3.4to 7.5pf = 16.4- = 8.0NP 4.4OE 3.6FG Conference: 35NP 10.4m 8.5p 11.2r 0.5a 0.3s 3.0b = 23.5+ 3.3mfg 1.1mft 2.5to 7.1pf = 14.0- = 9.5NP 4.1OE 5.4FG Post-Season: 8NP 12.2m 6.6p 10.4r 0.0a 0.0s 1.6b = 18.6+ 0.5mfg 2.2mft 2.7to 8.8pf = 14.2- = 4.4NP 3.9OE 0.5FG Total: 74NP 12.4m 8.7p 10.3r 0.4a 1.1s 2.1b = 22.6+ 2.3mfg 2.3mft 2.9to 7.6pf = 15.1- = 7.5NP 3.7OE 3.8FG Comments: Bourama’s positives are similar to Chukwu’s. He misses more field goals and is a worse free throw shooter. He also makes more turnovers. But the big thing is that he commits fouls at a rate that prevents him from playing for long stretches. So does his knee, which may also account for the fouls because it means he can’t get to where he needs to be as well as a healthy player could. FORWARDS [B]Oshae Brissett[/B] Non-conference: 194NP 37.0m 19.8p 13.0r 1.5a 1.4s 0.7b = 36.4+ 10.8mfg 2.0mft 1.9to 2.3pf = 17.0 = 19.4NP 7.0OE 12.4FG Conference: 214NP 38.6m 14.8p 8.1r 0.9a 1.3s 0.8b = 25.9+ 7.8mfg 0.9mft 2.1to 2.7pf = 13.5 = 12.4NP 6.1OE 6.3FG Post-Season: 82NP 39.2m 16.5p 9.5r 0.7a 1.2s 1.4b = 29.3+ 8.9mfg 2.0mft 2.2to 2.2pf = 15.3- = 14.0NP 5.6OE 8.4FG Total: 490NP 38.1m 15.7p 9.3r 1.0a 1.2s 0.8b = 28.0+ 8.4mfg 1.3mft 2.4to 2.0pf = 14.1- = 13.9NP 6.0OE 7.9FG Comments: Oshae put up big numbers against the mostly lesser non-conference teams, then settled somewhat against the conference and in the post season but still had one of the better freshmen years anyone has had here. He was a good and versatile scorer, and a natural rebounder. He committed too many charging fouls but his overall foul total was low for a true freshmen. [B]Marek Dolezaj[/B] Non-conference: 103NP 23.7m 8.8p 9.7r 3.1a 1.8s 1.6b = 25.0+ 2.6mfg 1.6mft 2.3to 4.5pf = 11.0- = 14.0NP 4.6OE 9.4FG Conference: 104NP 28.7m 6.5p 5.8r 2.1a 1.0s 0.9b = 16.3+ 2.5mfg 0.5mft 1.6to 3.7pf = 8.3- = 8.0NP 3.5OE 4.5FG Post-Season: 57NP 34.8m 12.8p 5.4r 1.1a 0.6s 1.0b = 20.9+ 3.1mfg 0.8mft 2.5to 3.6pf = 10.0- = 10.9NP 8.9OE 2.0FG Total: 264NP 27.9m 8.3p 6.9r 2.2a 1.2s 1.1b = 19.7+ 2.6mfg 0.9mft 2.0to 3.9pf = 9.4- = 10.3NP 4.8OE 5.5FG Comments: Marek showed his skills and smarts in the pre-conference season. The ACC season seemed to be little too fast and too physical for him. He was timid about taking his shot until late in the year, then started making them became a key player. He could make the 10 footer and finish at the basket, (partially because he wasn’t being defended). I have hopes that he can develop a three point shot. That would make him quite a player as he is an excellent passer and a good rebounder and shot blocker. [B]Matthew Moyer[/B] Non-conference: 72NP 20.2m 8.4p 9.3r 0.9a 0.9s 0.6b = 20.1+ 3.4mfg 1.4mft 1.5to 2.9pf = 9.2- = 10.9NP 3.6OE 7.3FG Conference: 64NP 17.9m 7.5p 7.5r 1.3a 0.7s 0.7b = 17.7+ 2.1mfg 1.0mft 1.7to 4.0pf = 8.8- = 8.9NP 4.4OE 4.5FG Post-Season: 0NP 6.3m 3.2p 5.3r 1.1a 2.1s 2.1b = 13.8+ 3.2mfg 3.2mft 3.2to 4.2pf = 13.8- = 0.0NP -3.2OE +3.2FG Total: 136NP 16.8m 7.7p 8.2r 1.1a 0.9s 0.7b = 18.6+ 2.7mfg 1.3mft 1.7to 3.5pf = 9.2- = 9.4NP 3.7OE 5.7FG Comments: Moyer was ranked the #44 recruit in the country coming out of high school. I remember looking at his film and I really didn’t see why. We sure didn’t see why this year. Matt turned out to be just a banger with minimal ability to shoot, handle or pass the ball. He hustled. He had some good games when he could get the ball off the boards. But that was about it and he lost time to the obviously more talented Dolezaj. His per 40 minute averages benefited somewhat from what I call the “reserve’s advantage”. If he played well, he played longer. If he played poorly he got yanked. That means his numbers are skewed toward his better performances whereas a guy playing 30-40 minutes a game will be out there whether he’s playing well or not. If Matt actually played at an 8 point 8 rebound per 40m level every time out he would have played a lot more. GUARDS [B]Tyus Battle[/B] Non-conference: 164NP 37.2m 21.6p 3.1r 1.7a 1.8s 0.4b = 28.6+ 9.9mfg 0.8mft 2.1to 2.2pf = 15.0 = 13.6NP 10.9OE 2.7FG Conference: 204NP 40.1m 19.9p 3.0r 2.1a 1.5s 0.1b = 26.6+ 9.7mfg 1.0mft 2.8to 1.9pf = 15.4 = 11.2NP 9.2OE 2.0FG Post-Season: 46NP 39.7m 15.6p 2.7r 3.0a 0.8s 0.0b = 22.1+ 9.6mfg 0.7mft 2.0to 2.2pf = 14.5- = 7.6NP 5.3OE 2.3FG Total: 414NP 39.0m 19.7p 3.0r 2.1a 1.5s 0.2b = 26.5+ 9.8mfg 0.9mft 2.4to 2.1pf = 15.2- = 11.3NP 9.0OE 2.3FG Comments: Tyus had the highest per game scoring average, (19.2), for an SU player since Hakim Warrick averaged 21.4 in 2005. And scoring should not be under-estimated: it decides who wins games. His shooting percentages were not good from the field for such a high scorer: 32.2% from three point range, 45.2% inside the arc and 39.9% overall. But he was also facing the brunt of the defense on every possession. Every opposing coach would have stopping Tyus his #1 priority. He always had someone on him and two guys if he tried to move toward the basket. My problem with his game was that he’s a 6-6 guard who averaged 3 rebounds and 2 assists per game and often had less than that. Of course JB may have wanted Howard and Battle to get back to stop the fast break and it’s not like we weren’t a good rebounding team. Tyus started using that defensive attention to set up passes to his teammates in the late going and hopefully we’ll see more of that next year. His low post-season production was due to a shooting slump that finally ended against Duke. [B]Frank Howard [/B] Non-conference: 153NP 36.8m 16.5p 3.9r 6.7a 2.5s 0.3b = 29.9+ 8.6mfg 1.3mft 4.4to 2.7pf = 17.0- = 12.9NP 6.6OE 6.3FG Conference: 161NP 39.5m 15.5p 3.2r 4.2a 1.5s 0.3b = 24.7+ 9.1mfg 1.0mft 3.0to 2.5pf = 15.6- = 9.1NP 5.4OE 4.7FG Post-Season: 34NP 39.2m 10.4p 4.3r 3.4a 2.0s 0.3b = 20.4+ 7.7mfg 0.3mft 3.4to 3.2pf = 14.6- = 5.8NP 2.4OE 3.4FG Total: 348NP 38.4m 15.0p 3.6r 4.9a 1.9s 0.3b = 25.7+ 8.7mfg 1.0mft 3.5to 2.7pf = 15.9- = 9.8NP 5.3OE 4.5FG Comments: Frank was a ‘scoring’ point guard, which is not a bad thing. Going into the season I saw him as more of a passer than a shooter. His assists declined as the season progressed and we went more and more to the dribble drive to score. But his turnovers went down and his scoring remained high until the post season when, he like battle, had a shooting slump. Maybe all those 40 mintue games caught up with our backcourt. [B]Howard Washington[/B] Non-conference: 6NP 4.6m 4.0p 5.3r 4.0a 0.7s 0.7b = 14.7+ 6.7mfg 0.7mft 2.0to 2.0pf = 11.4- = 3.3NP -3.4OE 6.7FG conference: 18NP 6.3m 10.4p 5.6r 3.2a 4.0s 0.0b = 23.2+ 1.6mfg 1.6mft 3.2to 2.4pf = 8.8- = 14.4NP 7.2OE 7.2FG Post-Season: 0NP (injured) Total: 24NP 6.1m 6.9p 5.5r 3.6a 2.2s 0.4b = 18.6+ 4.4mfg 1.1mft 2.5to 1.8pf = 9.8- = 8.8NP 1.4OE 7.4FG Comments: Howard we hardly knew ye. But I think he has potential to play a solid role in the future, although the competition for playing time in the backcourt will continue to be fierce. He was starting to make significant contributions. It’s interesting that he was a strong rebounder even though he’s three inches shorter than Battle. [B]Geno Thorpe[/B] Non-conference:19NP 14.3m 16.7p 2.3r 2.8a 2.8s 0.0b = 24.6+ 11.2mfg 0.5mft 3.3to 3.3pf = 18.3- = 6.3NP 5.0OE 1.3FG Conference: (left team) Post-Season: (left team) Total: 19NP 14.3m 16.7p 2.3r 2.8a 2.8s 0.0b = 24.6+ 11.2mfg 0.5mft 3.3to 3.3pf = 18.3- = 6.3NP 5.0OE 1.3FG Comments: Geno could have bee n a significant contributor to the team but walked his own plank. BLASTS FROM THE PAST Statistically and physically comparable players from past seasons using the numbers in the SU media Guide, which now goes back to the 1980-81 season. To [B]Paschal Chukwu [/B]as a junior 27.2m 7.8p 10.0r 0.6a 1.0s 3.6b = 23.0+ 1.5mfg 1.3mft 1.6to 4.6pf = 9.0- = 14.0NP 5.0OE 9.0FG Conrad McRae as a junior 29.4m 11.8p 8.4r 1.2a 2.0s 3.3b +26.7 3.6mfg 2.5mft 1.3to 5.3pf -12.7 = 14.0NP 5.7OE 8.3FG Jeremy McNeil as a sophomore 14.7m 9.2p 10.2r 0.3a 1.3s 4.1b +25.1 1.9mfg 1.5mft 2.1to 7.6pf -13.1 = 12.0NP 5.8OE 6.2FG Darryl Watkins as a junior 29.8m 9.6p 9.7r 0.9a 1.7s 3.8b 25.7+ 3.5mfg 1.6mft 2.5to 4.2pf 11.8- = 13.9NP 4.5OE 9.4FG Baye Moussa Keita as a freshman 14.6m 6.0p 10.3r 0.5a 1.6s 3.4b 21.8+ 1.9mfg 1.3mft 1.6to 5.9pf 10.7- = 11.1NP 2.8OE 8.3FG Rakeem Christmas as a junior 23.6m 9.8p 8.6r 1.1a 0.8s 3.3b +23.6 2.4mfg 0.8mft 1.3to 5.3pf -9.8 = 13.8NP 6.6OE 7.2FG Watkins is probably the best fit. He scored a bit more and missed more shots but everything else falls into place. To [B]Bourama Sidibie[/B] as a freshman 12.4m 8.7p 10.3r 0.4a 1.1s 2.1b = 22.6+ 2.3mfg 2.3mft 2.9to 7.6pf = 15.1- = 7.5NP 3.7OE 3.8FG Rodney Walker as a freshman 12.6m 10.5p 9.9r 0.6a 0.9s 0.4b 22.3+ 4.9mfg 1.5mft 1.7to 7.1pf 15.2- = 7.1NP 4.1OE 3.0FG Herman Harried as a sophomore 7.8m 10.7p 9.9r 2.6a 1.2s 2.8b 27.2+ 4.3mfg 3.1mft 3.9to 8.2pf 19.5- = 7.7NP 3.3OE 4.4FG Jeremy McNeil as a sophomore 15.9m 6.3p 7.9r 0.3a 0.8s 4.7b +20.0 1.3mfg 1.2mft 1.9to 7.6pf -12.0 = 8.0NP 3.8OE 4.2FG DaShonte Riley as a freshman 4.5m 5.9p 6.6r 2.8a 0.5s 4.1b 19.9+ 1.5mfg 1.5mft 3.1to 7.1pf 13.2- = 6.7NP 2.9OE 3.8FG Baye Moussa Keita as a senior 15.5m 4.7p 9.9r 0.8a 1.0s 2.4b = 18.8+ 1.9mfg 0.6mft 1.9to 6.3pf = 10.7- = 8.1NP 2.2OE 5.9FG The best statistical comparison might be Herman Harried but Herman was a long-armed, (and fingered) 6-7 forward and I think Bourama’s potential greatly exceeds that of the “Helicopter”. Actually I think that’s true of all five guys. Keita’s probably the best comparison except he was a senior and had good knees. To [B]Oshae Brissett[/B] as a freshman 38.1m 15.7p 9.3r 1.0a 1.2s 0.8b = 28.0+ 8.4mfg 1.3mft 2.4to 2.0pf = 14.1- = 13.9NP 6.0OE 7.9FG Sean Kerins as a senior 28.3m 15.7p 7.9r 1.4a 1.0s 0.5b 26.5+ 6.4mfg 0.4mft 1.7to 3.0pf 11.5- = 15.0np 8.9oe 6.1fg Todd Burgan as a junior 33.8m 17.9p 9.0r 3.1a 1.9s 0.3b +32.2 9.1mfg 1.8mft 4.0to 3.4pf -18.3 = 13.9NP 7.0OE 6.9FG Damone Brown as a sophomore 24.7m 15.4p 8.8r 1.3a 1.4s 1.1b +28.0 6.3mfg 0.7mft 2.1to 4.8pf -13.9 = 14.1NP 8.4OE 5.7FG Terrence Roberts as a sophomore 18.5m 15.6p 8.5r 1.3a 2.4s 1.8b 29.6+ 4.7mfg 2.4mft 3.0to 6.5pf 16.6- = 13.0NP 8.5OE 4.5FG Jerami Grant as a sophomore 31.4m 15.4p 8.6r 1.8a 1.0s 0.7b = 27.5+ 5.4mfg 2.3mft 1.5to 3.0pf = 12.2- = 15.3NP 7.7OE 7.6FG Brown is probably the closest statistical fit but I like the Grant comparison because, like Oshae, he’s all about potential. To [B]Marek Dolezaj[/B] as a freshman 27.9m 8.3p 6.9r 2.2a 1.2s 1.1b = 19.7+ 2.6mfg 0.9mft 2.0to 3.9pf = 9.4- = 10.3 NP 4.8OE 5.5FG Sean Kerins as a freshman 12.1m 11.9p 7.7r 1.5a 1.1s 0.7b 22.9+ 4.4mfg 0.7mft 2.2to 4.5pf 11.8- = NP: 11.1 OE: 6.8 FG: 4.3 Herman Harried as a junior 8.0m 13.4p 9.1r 1.5a 1.0s 1.7b 26.7+ 2.6mfg 3.9mft 3.9to 5.6pf 16.0- = 10.7NP 6.9OE 3.8FG Bobby Lazor as a freshman 7.8m 12.1p 9.1r 1.4a 1.4s 1.2b +25.2 4.7mfg 3.0mft 1.9to 5.3pf -14.9 = 10.3NP 4.4OE 5.9FG Kristoff Ongenaet as a junior 19.2m 9.3p 9.3r 2.1a 1.4s 1.2b 23.3+ 3.0mfg 1.3mft 2.6to 4.9pf 11.8- = 11.5NP 5.0OE 6.5FG Baye Moussa Keita as a sophomore 11.6m 7.4p 8.1r 0.2a 0.6s 3.2b = 19.5+ 1.2mfg 0.7mft 1.0to 6.1pf = 9.0- = 10.5NP 5.5OE 5.0FG Ongenaet is the most obvious comparison but the issue of potential comes up again. Marek has much more offensive potential than Kristoff had. Lazor is kind of interesting, especially since he went on to star for our old friends at Arizona State: [URL="http://thesundevils.com/news/2013/4/17/208247348.aspx"]Player Bio: Bobby Lazor - Arizona State University Official Athletic Site - Arizona State University[/URL] Could Marek develop into a player like that? To [B]Matthew Moyer[/B] as a redshirt freshman 16.8m 7.7p 8.2r 1.1a 0.9s 0.7b = 18.6+ 2.7mfg 1.3mft 1.7to 3.5pf = 9.2- = 9.4NP 3.7OE 5.7FG Herman Harried as a sophomore 7.8m 10.7p 9.9r 2.6a 1.2s 2.8b 27.2+ 4.3mfg 3.1mft 3.9to 8.2pf 19.5- = 7.7NP 3.3OE 4.4FG Jeremy McNeil as a freshman 15.9m 6.3p 7.9r 0.3a 0.8s 4.7b +20.0 1.3mfg 1.2mft 1.9to 7.6pf -12.0 = 8.0NP 3.8OE 4.2FG Kristoff Ongenaet as a junior 19.2m 9.3p 9.3r 2.1a 1.4s 1.2b 23.3+ 3.0mfg 1.3mft 2.6to 4.9pf 11.8- = 11.5NP 5.0OE 6.5FG Baye Moussa Keita as a sophomore 11.6m 7.4p 8.1r 0.2a 0.6s 3.2b = 19.5+ 1.2mfg 0.7mft 1.0to 6.1pf = 9.0- = 10.5NP 5.5OE 5.0FG Tyler Roberson as a freshman 8.1m 10.6p 9.4r 1.2a 1.0s 1.0b = 23.2+ 8.1mfg 1.7mft 1.7to 4.2pf = 15.7- = 7.5NP 0.8OE 6.7FG People think of Roberson when they think of Moyer: if he rebounds, he scores. But Tyler was clearly better over the last three years of his career. Keita is a good statistic match but Moyer isn’t a center. Same thing with McNeil. Ongenaet was similar in some ways but better and Harried would have been better but he committed too many fouls. So maybe Roberson as a freshman is the best comparison. To [B]Tyus Battle[/B] as a sophomore 39.0m 19.7p 3.0r 2.1a 1.5s 0.2b = 26.5+ 9.8mfg 0.9mft 2.4to 2.1pf = 15.2- = 11.3NP 9.0OE 2.3FG Tony Bruin as a sophomore 23.4m 20.2p 5.8r 1.8a 1.0s 0.8b 29.6+ 6.3mfg 2.1mft 4.0to 4.8pf 17.2- = NP: 12.4 OE: 11.8 FG: 0.6 DeShaun Williams as a junior 35.0m 18.2p 4.0r 4.7a 2.4s 0.3b +29.6 10.4mfg 1.2mft 4.5to 2.8pf -18.9 = 10.7NP 6.6OE 4.1FG Eric Devendorf as a freshman 27.1m 18.1p 3.6r 3.5a 1.5s 0.6b 27.3+ 8.3mfg 0.6mft 3.4to 3.9pf 16.2- = 11.1NP 9.2OE 1.9FG Brandon Triche as a sophomore 28.8m 15.5p 3.7r 4.0a 1.1s 0.1b 24.4+ 7.1mfg 0.6mft 2.9to 2.7pf 13.3- = 11.1NP 7.8OE 3.3FG Dion Waiters as a freshman 16.3m 16.1p 3.8r 3.6a 2.7s 0.3b 26.5+ 8.1mfg 0.6mft 2.2to 3.3pf 14.2- = 12.3NP 7.4OE 4.9FG Devo might actually be the best comparison here because of his combination of being able to hit the outside shot or drive to the basket. Waiters had that, too but wasn’t quite as good from outside. To [B]Frank Howard[/B] as a junior 38.4m 15.0p 3.6r 4.9a 1.9s 0.3b = 25.7+ 8.7mfg 1.0mft 3.5to 2.7pf = 15.9- = 9.8NP 5.3OE 4.5FG Gene Waldron as a senior 26.8m 13.7p 3.3r 5.8a 1.6s 0.0b 24.4+ 6.1mfg 1.4mft 3.6to 3.8pf 14.9- = 9.5np 6.2oe 3.3fg Adrian Autry as a sophomore 32.7m 13.5p 5.0r 4.9a 1.9s 0.2b +25.5 7.5mfg 1.5mft 4.0to 3.8pf -16.8 = 8.7NP 4.5OE 4.2FG Josh Wright as a sophomore 12.5m 13.4p 4.2r 5.1a 2.8s 0.0b 25.5+ 5.5mfg 2.6mft 4.4to 2.6pf 15.1- = 10.4NP 5.3OE 5.1FG Scoop Jardine as a freshman 19.6m 11.2p 3.1r 5.1a 2.4s 0.2b 22.0+ 5.0mfg 0.4mft 3.7to 3.9pf 13.0- = 9.0NP 5.8OE 3.2FG Trevor Cooney as a senior 36.4M 14.2P 2.8R 2.6A 1.8S 0.2B = 21.6+ 8.3MFG 0.6MFT 1.7TO 1.5PF = 12.1- = 9.5NP 5.3OE 4.2FG Adrian Autry is probably the best comparison here. Gene Waldron had his famous 40 points game as a senior. To [B]Howard Washington[/B] as a freshman 6.1m 6.9p 5.5r 3.6a 2.2s 0.4b = 18.6+ 4.4mfg 1.1mft 2.5to 1.8pf = 9.8- = 8.8NP 1.4OE 7.4FG Eddie Moss a senior 32.8m 7.7p 2.8a 6.6a 3.0s 0.3b 20.4+ 2.2mfg 0.8mft 3.9to 3.9pf 10.8- = NP: 9.6 OE: 4.7 FG: 4.9 Greg Monroe as a freshman 15.3m 7.7p 3.1r 5.8a 0.8s 0.1b 17.5+ 4.3mfg 0.5mft 1.8to 2.3pf 8.9- = 8.6np 2.9oe 5.7fg Lazarus Sims as a freshman 9.7m 5.4p 4.6r 8.0a 0.2s 2.2b +20.4 5.6mfg 0.5mft 4.1to 2.5pf -12.7= 7.7NP -0.7OE 8.4FG Billy Edelin as a junior 15.7m 10.2p 3.2r 4.5a 2.0s 0.1b 20.0+ 4.2mfg 0.9mft 3.5to 2.0pf 10.6- = 9.4NP 5.1OE 4.3FG Scoop Jardine as a freshman 19.6m 11.2p 3.1r 5.1a 2.4s 0.2b 22.0+ 5.0mfg 0.4mft 3.7to 3.9pf 13.0- = 9.0NP 5.8OE 3.2FG No clear match here. Washington hasn’t really emerged as a ‘type’ yet. I think he has solid all-around skills so maybe Jardine might be the best match. To [B]Geno Thorpe[/B] as a 5th year senior 14.3m 16.7p 2.3r 2.8a 2.8s 0.0b = 24.6+ 11.2mfg 0.5mft 3.3to 3.3pf = 18.3- = 6.3NP 5.0OE 1.3FG Gene Waldron as a freshman 12.9m 13.1p 2.6r 3.9a 2.7s 0.7b 23.0+ 6.2mfg 1.0mft 5.7to 5.9pf 18.8- = NP: 4.2 OE: 5.9 FG: 0.7 Michael Edwards as a sophomore 26.2m 12.0p 2.3r 4.0a 1.1s 0.1b +19.5 7.0mfg 0.6mft 3.3to 2.1pf -13.0 = 6.5NP 4.4OE 2.1FG Anthony Harris as a freshman 12.2m 11.5p 2.9r 3.5a 0.7s 0.7b +19.3 7.3mfg 0.2mft 3.8to 4.4pf -15.7 = 3.6NP 4.0OE -0.4FG Rock Lloyd as a freshman 11.8m 15.4p 6.6r 2.0a 2.2s 0.1b +26.3 8.4mfg 3.0mft 4.1to 3.9pf -19.4 = 6.9NP 4.0OE 2.9FG Trevor Cooney as a freshman 11.2m 12.2p 2.9r 2.1a 2.6s 0.3b 20.1+ 9.1mfg 0.4mft 1.7to 3.0pf = 14.2- = 5.9NP 2.7OE Again, Geno wasn’t here very long so it’s hard to see what he might have become if he had stuck with it. Cooney looks like the best statistical match but missed even more shots than he did. Lloyd was more of a rebounder. Waldron, Edwards and even Harris had more assists. I guess it doesn’t matter now. I will put the “etcetera” part of it in another post, probably over the weekend. [/QUOTE]

Verification: What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?