SWC75
Bored Historian
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 33,715
- Like
- 64,917
I will again be doing a report after each game this season and a summary report at the end of the non-conference season, the ACC season and the post season.
Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)
Oshae Brissett 19NP in 40 minutes
Buddy Boeheim 6NP in 25 minutes
Paschal Chukwu 5NP in 16 minutes
Bourama Sidibe 5NP in 22 minutes
Marek Dolezaj 2NP in 26 minutes
Tyus Battle 1NP in 35 minutes
Frank Howard -4NP in 25 minutes
Elijah Hughes -4NP in 11 minutes
DNP coach’s decision
Robert Braswell and Jalen Carey
Injured
None
Out for the year
Howard Washington
Awards
Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Oshae Brissett 15 points + 3 assists = 18
Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus field goal and free throw attempts)
Oshae Brissett 15 points – 3 mfg – 0 mft = +12
Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Oshae Brissett 15 of 21 possible points = 71.4%
Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half?)
1st Half- Oshae Brissett lay-up 2:09 in
2nd Half- Frank Howard trey 1:03 in
TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub)
No tacos for us!
My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Oshae Brissett 40 minutes
TEAM STATS
Possession
Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 6 of our 33 misses = 18.2%
They rebounded 18 of their 42 misses = 42.9%
Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 8 points on 6 O-Rebs = 1.333 points/O-reb
They got 11 points on 18 O-Rebs = 0.611 points/O-reb
Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 18 turnovers – 11 steals = 7 unforced
They had 15 turnovers – 8 steals = 7 unforced
Points per Takeaway
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 11 points from 15 takeaways = 0.733 points/takeaway
They had 16 points from 18 takeaways = 0.889 points/takeaway
Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeaway: [Second Chance Point + Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 19 points in 21 unsettled situations = 0.905 points
They had 27 points in 36 unsettled situations = 0.750 points
Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 30 + 15 = 45
They had 45 + 18 = 636
Hustle Stats
One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + steals + blocks. I decided to keep track of that, too:
We had 30 + 8 + 4 = 42
They had 45 + 11 + 5 = 60
Scoring
Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 12 for 29 on twos, (41.4%), 6 for 19 on threes (31.6%) and 13 for 17 on frees (76.5%)
They were 14 for 32 on twos, (33.9%), 5 for 24 on threes (20.8%) and 24 for 30 on frees (80.0%)
Combined percentages were: 1495 (414 + 316 + 765) vs. 1347 (339 + 208 + 800) = +148
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points
POTO= points off turnovers
We had 18 PIP, 24 POP, 18 OL, 6 TZ, 11 POTO, 0 FBP
They had 20 PIP, 23 POP, 15 OL, 2 TZ, 16 POTO, 0 FBP
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 0 FBP in 36 opportunities (00.0%)
They scored 0 FBP in 43 opportunities (00.0%)
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 34 FCP and 8 SCP
They had 32 FCP and 11 SCP
Last Possessions
(Points scored on the last full possession of a half, a game or an overtime period.)
We scored 2 points
They scored 0 points
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 30 points and our bench scored 25 points
Their starters scored 60 points and their bench scored 7 points
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 8 of our 18 field goals = 44.4%
They assisted 13 of their 19 field goals = 68.4%
Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 55 points in 68 possessions = 0.808 points/ possession
They scored 67 points in 67 possessions = 1.000 points/possession
It was a 115 possession game.
If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession:
We scored 55 points in 56 possessions = 0.982 points/ possession
They scored 67 points in 70 possessions = 0.957 points/possession
Team Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)
We scored 55 points, missed 30 field goals and 4 missed free throws = net 21
They scored 67 points, missed 37 field goals and 6 missed free throws = net 24
(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)
We scored 55 on 29 two point attempts, 19 three point attempts and 17 free throw attempts = 55 of a possible 132 points = 41.7% of possible points scored.
They scored 67 on 32 two point attempts, 24 three point attempts and 30 free throw attempts = 67 of a possible 166 points = 40.4% of possible points scored.
Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)
13-10, 18-14, 10-23, 14-20
Fouls
(Two point shots and free throws attempted per times fouled.)
We attempted 29 two point shots, attempted 17 free throws and were fouled 14 times = 2.07; 1.21
They attempted 32 two point shots, attempted 30 free throws and were fouled 21 times = 1.52; 1.43
They were equally likely to get calls when attempting two point shots and they got more free throws per foul.
Comments
- Our rebounding deficit (18.2%-42.9%) was second only to that at North Carolina (22.2%-51.4%). The next closest was Georgetown (18.4%-34.1%). We won that one and that may be the limit of how badly we can be out-rebounded and still win.
- We actually played good defense in unsettled situations, (turnovers and offensive rebounds), giving up only 0.750 points per situation vs. 0.905, which is a good average in itself. But due to the number of such situations (21 vs. 36), we were down in those situation by 8 points, (19-27).
- We out-shot Clemson from inside (41.4%-33.9%) and outside (31.6%-20.8%) the arc and nearly matched them from the line (76.5%-80.0%) but didn’t come close to winning.
- Did you think the game looked a bit ugly? Fast break Points: 0. For both teams.
- The good news: Our bench out-scored theirs 25-7. Who says JB doesn’t develop his bench? The bad news: Our starters were out-scored 30-60. THIRTY TO SIXTY!
- We were slightly more efficient in scoring if you use adjusted possessions, (deleting offensive rebounds and turnovers from the comp: 0.982-0.957. But by that formula, we had 56 possessions to their 70.
Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)
Oshae Brissett 19NP in 40 minutes
Buddy Boeheim 6NP in 25 minutes
Paschal Chukwu 5NP in 16 minutes
Bourama Sidibe 5NP in 22 minutes
Marek Dolezaj 2NP in 26 minutes
Tyus Battle 1NP in 35 minutes
Frank Howard -4NP in 25 minutes
Elijah Hughes -4NP in 11 minutes
DNP coach’s decision
Robert Braswell and Jalen Carey
Injured
None
Out for the year
Howard Washington
Awards
Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Oshae Brissett 15 points + 3 assists = 18
Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus field goal and free throw attempts)
Oshae Brissett 15 points – 3 mfg – 0 mft = +12
Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Oshae Brissett 15 of 21 possible points = 71.4%
Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half?)
1st Half- Oshae Brissett lay-up 2:09 in
2nd Half- Frank Howard trey 1:03 in
TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub)
No tacos for us!
My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Oshae Brissett 40 minutes
TEAM STATS
Possession
Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 6 of our 33 misses = 18.2%
They rebounded 18 of their 42 misses = 42.9%
Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 8 points on 6 O-Rebs = 1.333 points/O-reb
They got 11 points on 18 O-Rebs = 0.611 points/O-reb
Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 18 turnovers – 11 steals = 7 unforced
They had 15 turnovers – 8 steals = 7 unforced
Points per Takeaway
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 11 points from 15 takeaways = 0.733 points/takeaway
They had 16 points from 18 takeaways = 0.889 points/takeaway
Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeaway: [Second Chance Point + Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 19 points in 21 unsettled situations = 0.905 points
They had 27 points in 36 unsettled situations = 0.750 points
Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 30 + 15 = 45
They had 45 + 18 = 636
Hustle Stats
One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + steals + blocks. I decided to keep track of that, too:
We had 30 + 8 + 4 = 42
They had 45 + 11 + 5 = 60
Scoring
Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 12 for 29 on twos, (41.4%), 6 for 19 on threes (31.6%) and 13 for 17 on frees (76.5%)
They were 14 for 32 on twos, (33.9%), 5 for 24 on threes (20.8%) and 24 for 30 on frees (80.0%)
Combined percentages were: 1495 (414 + 316 + 765) vs. 1347 (339 + 208 + 800) = +148
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points
POTO= points off turnovers
We had 18 PIP, 24 POP, 18 OL, 6 TZ, 11 POTO, 0 FBP
They had 20 PIP, 23 POP, 15 OL, 2 TZ, 16 POTO, 0 FBP
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 0 FBP in 36 opportunities (00.0%)
They scored 0 FBP in 43 opportunities (00.0%)
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 34 FCP and 8 SCP
They had 32 FCP and 11 SCP
Last Possessions
(Points scored on the last full possession of a half, a game or an overtime period.)
We scored 2 points
They scored 0 points
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 30 points and our bench scored 25 points
Their starters scored 60 points and their bench scored 7 points
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 8 of our 18 field goals = 44.4%
They assisted 13 of their 19 field goals = 68.4%
Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 55 points in 68 possessions = 0.808 points/ possession
They scored 67 points in 67 possessions = 1.000 points/possession
It was a 115 possession game.
If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession:
We scored 55 points in 56 possessions = 0.982 points/ possession
They scored 67 points in 70 possessions = 0.957 points/possession
Team Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)
We scored 55 points, missed 30 field goals and 4 missed free throws = net 21
They scored 67 points, missed 37 field goals and 6 missed free throws = net 24
(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)
We scored 55 on 29 two point attempts, 19 three point attempts and 17 free throw attempts = 55 of a possible 132 points = 41.7% of possible points scored.
They scored 67 on 32 two point attempts, 24 three point attempts and 30 free throw attempts = 67 of a possible 166 points = 40.4% of possible points scored.
Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)
13-10, 18-14, 10-23, 14-20
Fouls
(Two point shots and free throws attempted per times fouled.)
We attempted 29 two point shots, attempted 17 free throws and were fouled 14 times = 2.07; 1.21
They attempted 32 two point shots, attempted 30 free throws and were fouled 21 times = 1.52; 1.43
They were equally likely to get calls when attempting two point shots and they got more free throws per foul.
Comments
- Our rebounding deficit (18.2%-42.9%) was second only to that at North Carolina (22.2%-51.4%). The next closest was Georgetown (18.4%-34.1%). We won that one and that may be the limit of how badly we can be out-rebounded and still win.
- We actually played good defense in unsettled situations, (turnovers and offensive rebounds), giving up only 0.750 points per situation vs. 0.905, which is a good average in itself. But due to the number of such situations (21 vs. 36), we were down in those situation by 8 points, (19-27).
- We out-shot Clemson from inside (41.4%-33.9%) and outside (31.6%-20.8%) the arc and nearly matched them from the line (76.5%-80.0%) but didn’t come close to winning.
- Did you think the game looked a bit ugly? Fast break Points: 0. For both teams.
- The good news: Our bench out-scored theirs 25-7. Who says JB doesn’t develop his bench? The bad news: Our starters were out-scored 30-60. THIRTY TO SIXTY!
- We were slightly more efficient in scoring if you use adjusted possessions, (deleting offensive rebounds and turnovers from the comp: 0.982-0.957. But by that formula, we had 56 possessions to their 70.