SWC75
Bored Historian
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 33,822
- Like
- 65,188
I will again be doing a report after each game this season and a summary report at the end of each month. (I’ve eliminated some stats from previous years to streamline this post.)
Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)
Joe Girard +13NP in 25 minutes = +138NP in 482 minutes = +11.5NP/40 for season
Marek Dolezaj +12NP in 37 minutes = +226NP in 574 minutes = +15.7NP/40 for season
Kadary Richmond +11NP in 28 minutes = +148NP in 340 minutes = +17.4NP/40 for season
Alan Griffin +3NP in 26 minutes = +246NP in 514 minutes = +19.1NP/40 for season
Quincy Guerrier 0NP in 34 minutes = +288NP in 540 minutes = +21.3NP/40 for season
Buddy Boeheim 0NP in 35 minutes = +108NP in 468 minutes = +9.2NP/40 for season
Bourama Sidibie -1NP in 11 minutes = 0NP in 15 minutes = 0.0NP/40 for season
Woody Newton -3NP in 4 minutes = +33NP in 82 minutes = +16.1NP/40 for season
DNP coach’s decision
Frank Anselem 0NP in 0 minutes = +5NP in 26 minutes = +7.7NP/40 for season
John Bol Ajak 0NP in 0 minutes = -1NP in 29 minutes = -1.4NP/40 for season
Robert Braswell 0NP in 0 minutes = +11NP in 104 minutes = +4.2NP/40 for season
Jesse Edwards 0NP in 0 minutes = +4NP in 47 minutes = +3.4NP/40 for season
Chaz Owens 0NP in 0 minute = 0NP in 1 minute = 0.0NP/40 for season
Injured and couldn’t play
Suspended
Redshirting
None (that we know of)
Out for the year
None
Left Team
None
Awards
Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Joe Girard 19 points and 2 assists = 21
Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goal and free throw attempts)
Joe Girard 19 points – 6mfg – 2mft = +11
Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Marek Dolezaj 10 points of 15 = 66.7%
My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Marek Dolezaj 37 minutes
TEAM STATS
Possession
Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 13 of our 44 misses = 29.5%
They rebounded 11 of their 23 misses = 47.8%
Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 11 points on 13 O-Rebs = 0.846 points/O-Reb
They got 18 points on 11 O-Rebs = 1.646 points/O-Reb
Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 8 turnovers – 4 steals = 4 unforced
They had 20 turnovers – 13 steals = 7 unforced
Points per Takeover
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 12 points from 20 takeovers = 0.600 points/takeaway
They had 8 points from 8 takeovers = 1.000 points/takeaway
Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeover: [Second Chance Points+ Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 24 points in 33 unsettled situations = 0.727 points
They had 26 points in 19 unsettled situations = 1.368 points
Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 25 + 20 = 45
They had 42 + 8 = 50
Hustle Stats
One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + blocks + steals. I decided to keep track of that, too:
We had 25 + 4 + 13 = 42
They had 42 + 5 + 4 = 51
Scoring
Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 13 for 40 on twos, (32.5%), 5 for 20 on threes (25.0%) and 20 for 27 on frees (74.1%)
They were 17 for 28 on twos, (60.7%), 10 for 23 on threes (43.5%) and 14 for 17 on frees (82.4%)
Combined percentages were: 325 + 250 + 741 = 1,316 vs. 607 + 435 + 824 = 1,866 = -550
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, (two point jumpers from outside the paint)
FBP = fast break points
POTO= points off turnovers
We had 24 PIP, 17 POP, 15 OL, 2 TZ, 12 POTO, 3 FBP
They had 26 PIP, 38 POP, 30 OL, 8 TZ, 8 POTO, 3 FBP
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 3 FBP in 36 opportunities (0.83%)
They scored 3 FBP in 44 opportunities (0.68%)
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 27 FCP and 11 SCP
They had 43 FCP and 18 SCP
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 57 points and our bench scored 4 points.
Their starters scored 44 points and their bench scored 34 points.
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 6 of our 18 field goals = 33.3%
They assisted 19 of their 27 field goals = 70.4%
Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 61 points in 68 possessions = 0.897 points/ possession
They scored 78 points in 68 possessions = 1.147 points/possession
It was a 136-possession game.
If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession:
We scored 61 points in 73 possessions = 0.836 points/ possession
They scored 78 points in 59 possessions = 1.322 points/possession
Team Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)
We scored 61 points, missed 42 field goals and missed 7 free throws = net +12
They scored 78 points, missed 24 field goals and missed 3 free throws = net +51
(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)
We scored 61 on 40 two point attempts, 20 three point attempts and 27 free throw attempts = 61 of a possible 167 points = 36.5% of possible points scored.
They scored 78 on 28 two point attempts, 23 three point attempts and 17 free throw attempts = 78 of a possible 142 points = 54.9% of possible points scored.
Fouls
(Most fouls are called on two point shot attempts.)
We attempted 40 two point shots and were fouled 17 times = 2.35
They attempted 28 two point shots and were fouled 14 times = 2.00
At this rate, if they’d taken 40 two point shots, they’d have been fouled 20 times.
Comments
- Joe Girard was 89.4% from the free throw line last year, one of the best marks in the nation. With his 3 for 5 performance today, he’s down to 80.0%, still very good but 4th on the team and not the ‘automatic FT shooter he was last year. Sometimes he seems to hurry them.
- It seems amazing that we had more offensive rebounds than they did, 13-11. It was 6-8 in the first half and 7-3 in the second. But you have to consider that we missed 44 reboundable shots to their 23.
- Our rebounds plus their turnovers gave us 45 manufactured possession to their 50. That can be overcome if we play well other wise.
- More important was the fact that they got 18 second chance points from their 11 offensive rebounds and we got only 11 from our 13. We also got only 12 points from our 20 takeovers while they got 8 for 8. That’s 24 points for us in 33 unsettled situations for us and 26 for them in only 19. If we could have done a decent job of putting the ball into the basket, we might have had a shot to win this game.
- Each team had 3 fast break points. That’s normal for Clemson but a poor job by us, especially since we weren’t doing well against a set defense.
- They got 34 bench points. We got 4.
Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)
Joe Girard +13NP in 25 minutes = +138NP in 482 minutes = +11.5NP/40 for season
Marek Dolezaj +12NP in 37 minutes = +226NP in 574 minutes = +15.7NP/40 for season
Kadary Richmond +11NP in 28 minutes = +148NP in 340 minutes = +17.4NP/40 for season
Alan Griffin +3NP in 26 minutes = +246NP in 514 minutes = +19.1NP/40 for season
Quincy Guerrier 0NP in 34 minutes = +288NP in 540 minutes = +21.3NP/40 for season
Buddy Boeheim 0NP in 35 minutes = +108NP in 468 minutes = +9.2NP/40 for season
Bourama Sidibie -1NP in 11 minutes = 0NP in 15 minutes = 0.0NP/40 for season
Woody Newton -3NP in 4 minutes = +33NP in 82 minutes = +16.1NP/40 for season
DNP coach’s decision
Frank Anselem 0NP in 0 minutes = +5NP in 26 minutes = +7.7NP/40 for season
John Bol Ajak 0NP in 0 minutes = -1NP in 29 minutes = -1.4NP/40 for season
Robert Braswell 0NP in 0 minutes = +11NP in 104 minutes = +4.2NP/40 for season
Jesse Edwards 0NP in 0 minutes = +4NP in 47 minutes = +3.4NP/40 for season
Chaz Owens 0NP in 0 minute = 0NP in 1 minute = 0.0NP/40 for season
Injured and couldn’t play
Suspended
Redshirting
None (that we know of)
Out for the year
None
Left Team
None
Awards
Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Joe Girard 19 points and 2 assists = 21
Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goal and free throw attempts)
Joe Girard 19 points – 6mfg – 2mft = +11
Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Marek Dolezaj 10 points of 15 = 66.7%
My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Marek Dolezaj 37 minutes
TEAM STATS
Possession
Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 13 of our 44 misses = 29.5%
They rebounded 11 of their 23 misses = 47.8%
Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 11 points on 13 O-Rebs = 0.846 points/O-Reb
They got 18 points on 11 O-Rebs = 1.646 points/O-Reb
Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 8 turnovers – 4 steals = 4 unforced
They had 20 turnovers – 13 steals = 7 unforced
Points per Takeover
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 12 points from 20 takeovers = 0.600 points/takeaway
They had 8 points from 8 takeovers = 1.000 points/takeaway
Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeover: [Second Chance Points+ Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 24 points in 33 unsettled situations = 0.727 points
They had 26 points in 19 unsettled situations = 1.368 points
Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 25 + 20 = 45
They had 42 + 8 = 50
Hustle Stats
One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + blocks + steals. I decided to keep track of that, too:
We had 25 + 4 + 13 = 42
They had 42 + 5 + 4 = 51
Scoring
Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 13 for 40 on twos, (32.5%), 5 for 20 on threes (25.0%) and 20 for 27 on frees (74.1%)
They were 17 for 28 on twos, (60.7%), 10 for 23 on threes (43.5%) and 14 for 17 on frees (82.4%)
Combined percentages were: 325 + 250 + 741 = 1,316 vs. 607 + 435 + 824 = 1,866 = -550
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, (two point jumpers from outside the paint)
FBP = fast break points
POTO= points off turnovers
We had 24 PIP, 17 POP, 15 OL, 2 TZ, 12 POTO, 3 FBP
They had 26 PIP, 38 POP, 30 OL, 8 TZ, 8 POTO, 3 FBP
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 3 FBP in 36 opportunities (0.83%)
They scored 3 FBP in 44 opportunities (0.68%)
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 27 FCP and 11 SCP
They had 43 FCP and 18 SCP
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 57 points and our bench scored 4 points.
Their starters scored 44 points and their bench scored 34 points.
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 6 of our 18 field goals = 33.3%
They assisted 19 of their 27 field goals = 70.4%
Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 61 points in 68 possessions = 0.897 points/ possession
They scored 78 points in 68 possessions = 1.147 points/possession
It was a 136-possession game.
If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession:
We scored 61 points in 73 possessions = 0.836 points/ possession
They scored 78 points in 59 possessions = 1.322 points/possession
Team Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)
We scored 61 points, missed 42 field goals and missed 7 free throws = net +12
They scored 78 points, missed 24 field goals and missed 3 free throws = net +51
(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)
We scored 61 on 40 two point attempts, 20 three point attempts and 27 free throw attempts = 61 of a possible 167 points = 36.5% of possible points scored.
They scored 78 on 28 two point attempts, 23 three point attempts and 17 free throw attempts = 78 of a possible 142 points = 54.9% of possible points scored.
Fouls
(Most fouls are called on two point shot attempts.)
We attempted 40 two point shots and were fouled 17 times = 2.35
They attempted 28 two point shots and were fouled 14 times = 2.00
At this rate, if they’d taken 40 two point shots, they’d have been fouled 20 times.
Comments
- Joe Girard was 89.4% from the free throw line last year, one of the best marks in the nation. With his 3 for 5 performance today, he’s down to 80.0%, still very good but 4th on the team and not the ‘automatic FT shooter he was last year. Sometimes he seems to hurry them.
- It seems amazing that we had more offensive rebounds than they did, 13-11. It was 6-8 in the first half and 7-3 in the second. But you have to consider that we missed 44 reboundable shots to their 23.
- Our rebounds plus their turnovers gave us 45 manufactured possession to their 50. That can be overcome if we play well other wise.
- More important was the fact that they got 18 second chance points from their 11 offensive rebounds and we got only 11 from our 13. We also got only 12 points from our 20 takeovers while they got 8 for 8. That’s 24 points for us in 33 unsettled situations for us and 26 for them in only 19. If we could have done a decent job of putting the ball into the basket, we might have had a shot to win this game.
- Each team had 3 fast break points. That’s normal for Clemson but a poor job by us, especially since we weren’t doing well against a set defense.
- They got 34 bench points. We got 4.
Last edited:
