SWC75
Bored Historian
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 33,699
- Like
- 64,898
I’ll continue doing a statistical analysis of games this year with some of the off-beat numbers I like to look at. I’ll post them after each game, probably the next day.
The first thing I’ll look at is “NET POINTS”. The idea is that each statistic in the box score is arguably worth a point, (that is, somewhere between 0.5 and 1.5 points). A point is a point. Teams score an average of a point per possession so anything that gets you possession is a point. A missed shot will more often than not wind up in the possession of the other team. Most baskets are for two points so if the passer who set up the shot is given half credit, that’s worth a point. One half of the blocked shots will likely have gone in and they are almost always two pointers, so that’s a point. If you add up the “positives”, (points, + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks) and subtract the “negatives”, (missed field goals, missed free throws, turnovers and fouls), you have a number that summarizes a player’s statistical contributions to a game. Then, by averaging the net points per 40 minutes of play, you factor out differences in playing time and have a look at the player’s rate of production. Both are important. The game is won based on what you actually did, not the rate at which you did it. But the rate is a better measure of the skills you can bring to the game.
Of course, there are things player do both on and off the court that contribute to victory. Leadership, hard work, keeping the team loose, scrambling for loose balls, (that could be a statistic: when neither team is in control of the ball, who winds up with it?), sneaker-sneaker defense, keeping the ball moving on offense, etc. etc. My experience is that with rare exceptions, the players who are the most statistically productive are the ones who grade highest in the things not measured by statistics, as well.
Here are the NET POINTS of our scholarship player in the most recent game and their averages per 40 minutes of play for the season, (exhibitions games not included):
C. J. Fair………………. 17NP in 39 minutes season: 286NP in 857 minutes per 40: 13.3
Jerami Grant……….. 14NP in 37 minutes season: 285NP in 696 minutes per 40: 16.4
Trevor Cooney…… 13NP in 33 minutes season: 281NP in 728 minutes per 40: 15.4
Rakeem Christmas 7NP in 26 minutes season: 174NP in 503 minutes per 40: 13.8
Michael Gbinije …. 4NP in 16 minutes season: 84NP in 288 minutes per 40: 11.7
Baye Moussa Keita 3NP in 5 minutes season: 80NP in 363 minutes per 40: 8.8
Tyler Ennis………….. 3NP in 35 minutes season: 312NP in 792 minutes per 40: 15.8
Ron Patterson…….. 0NP in 1 minutes season: 12NP in 50 minutes per 40: 9.6
B. J. Johnson……….. 0NP in 1 minutes season: 1NP in 51 minutes per 40: 0.8
Tyler Roberson……. -2NP in 7 minutes season: 19NP in 120 minutes per 40: 6.3
DaJuan Coleman…. 0NP in 0 minutes season: 61NP in 169 minutes per 40: 14.4
Comment: Ennis’s numbers are starting to sag slightly. It happened in the Wake Forest game. Tyler had 19 net points in the Duke game but it was a great offensive game for both teams. We had four players with more NP in that game. He had 11 in the Notre Dame game but 8 came on assists, mostly to Trevor Cooney. He has 3 in this game. He’s shot 5 for 16 from the field in these last two games.
Tyler Ennis has led in net points 9 times. Trevor Cooney has led 5 times, CJ Fair 4 Jerami Grant 3 times, Rakeem Christmas twice and DaJuan Coleman and now Baye Keita once each.
Possession:
Before you can score you’ve got to get the rock. Syracuse had 13 offensive and 16 defensive rebounds. They had 13 offensive and 18 defensive rebounds. When we missed we got the ball 13 of 31 times, (41.9%). When they missed, they got the ball 13 of 29 times (44.8%). We’ve averaged getting 40.5% of our misses and our opposition has gotten 31.7% of theirs. We have won the rebounding battle by this measure 16 times in 23 games
Of our 5 turnovers, 1 was their steals and 4 were our own miscues. Of their 13 turnovers, 6 were Syracuse steals and 7 were their fault. Syracuse has had fewer turnovers in 19 of 23 games, with two even. Overall we are ahead by 114 turnovers on the season, (212-326) and are also ahead in unforced errors, (113-125). We have had single digit turnovers in 8 of 10 ACC games and had only 10 in the other two. That’s very impressive for a team with a young backcourt.
If you add our 29 rebounds to their 13 turnovers, we had 42 “manufactured possessions”. They had 31 + 5 = 36, so we were +6. We’ve won that battle 20 times this season in 23 games, with an average margin of +10.0. We’ve won by double figures 13 times. It’s the main reason we are 23-0.
Shooting:
It’s still what the game is all about. And it won this game for us- but not on outside jump shots. We were 20 for 41, (.488) inside the arc, 4 for 13, (.308) outside it and 5 for 7 (.714) from the line. They were 9 for 26 (.346), 5/15 (.333) and 11/15 (.733). On the season, Syracuse is shooting .497/.361/.699, the opposition .455/.335/.661. We complain about our free throw shooting but we are now out-shooting the opposition on the year by 38 points. Here are our two point percentages for every year of this decade: 2009-10: .571-.462 (+109), 2010-11: .562-.444 (+118), 2011-12: .519-.425 (+94), 2012-13: .485-.425 (+60). So far this year: .497-.455 = +42.
We had 57 points, 32 in the paint, 12 from the arc and 5 from the line so we scored 8 points from what I’ll call the “Twilight Zone”: that area between the paint and the arc that is the land of the pull-up jump shot, a lost art but a great weapon. They had 44-14-15-11= 4 points in the Twilight Zone. Overall, we had 20 POP: Points Outside the Paint to 19 for them. So far this year Syracuse is averaging 24 POP, 8 from the TZ, the opposition 26/5.
10 of our 24 baskets were assisted (.417) and 7 of their 14 (.500). For the year we are assisting on 51.5% of our baskets to 63.8% for the opposition, who have had more assists or a higher percentage in 19 of 23 games, all of which we’ve won. Assists tend to come more often from jump shots than lay-ups or dunks so the more assists you get, the more you are settling for jumps shots to try to win the game which is often a bad strategy.
You compute “Offensive Efficiency” by taking field goal attempts – offensive rebounds + turnovers plus 47.5% of free throws attempted and dividing that into the number of points. We were 54 FGA - 13 OREBs + 5 TOs + (.475 x 7) = 49.325 possessions. They were 41 -13 + 13 + (.475 x 15) = 48.125 possessions. Since possessions shouldn’t be more than one off, I’ll count that as 49 possessions in which we scored 57 points, (1.163) and 48 possessions in which they scored 44 points, (0.917). For the year we are 1.165 vs. 0.959. We’ve been more efficient than our opposition in every game so far, which is also why we are 23-0. We’ve averaged 120 combined possessions per game this year. In this game, there were 97 possessions, the lowest combined total of the year. Clemson came in with a reputation as a great defensive team. Our offensive efficiency was right on our average for the year. We got plenty of good shots. Clemson doesn’t give up a lot of points simply because they play so slowly and hold the score down. They aren’t a great defensive team.
Every other level of basketball plays quarters. To check the consistency of our performance, I look at what the score was at the 10 minute mark of each half to see what the quarterly scores would be. At a minimum, I think we want to score at least 15 points in each quarter and try to hold the opposition to less than that. The quarterly breakdown for this game: 14-11, 17-11, 13-15, 13-7. The average for the season is: 16-13, 19-15, 17-15, 19-15. We’ve won 60 quarters, (and one overtime), lost 25 and tied 7. We’ve scored at least 15 in 67 of 92 quarters and held the opposition under that 49 times.
Hubert Davis once told us to “Get an offensive dude”. I decided to name an “Offensive Dude Of the Game, or an O-Dog, and use the hockey concept of points + assists. In this game CJ Fair had 19 points and 0 assists for 19 “hockey points”. So far Tyler Ennis has led 10 times and CJ Fair has done it 9 times, Trevor Cooney 5 times and Jerami Grant has done it twice, including ties.
I also like to keep track who sits us down in each half. Besides being fun it gives an indication of who Coach B likes to design plays for since opening possessions are more likely to be scripted than those later in the game, (although sometimes we don’t score until later in the gameCJ Fairsat us down in the first half with a jump shot at 1:16. Jerami Grant did in the second half with a lay-up 57 seconds in. CJ Fair has now sat us down 13 times, Tyler Ennis 9 times, Rakeem Christmas and Trevor Cooney 6 times, DaJuan Coleman 5 times and Jerami Grant 4 times, (remember he didn’t start until Coleman got hurt).
Longest: 8:50, second half vs. Miami. We were 4:51 vs. St. Francis, (second half), 3:12 vs. Villanova (first half) 2:37 vs. Notre Dame (first half), 2:29 vs. Eastern Michigan (second half), 2:13 vs. Pittsburgh (first half), 2:05 vs. North Carolina (second half), 1:45 vs. Boston College (first half), 1:38 vs. Pittsburgh (second half), 1:26 vs. Duke (first half), 1:25 vs. Wake Forest, (1st half), 1:21 vs. Duke (second half) 1:18 vs. North Carolina (first half) and 1:16 vs. Clemson (first half)
The first thing I’ll look at is “NET POINTS”. The idea is that each statistic in the box score is arguably worth a point, (that is, somewhere between 0.5 and 1.5 points). A point is a point. Teams score an average of a point per possession so anything that gets you possession is a point. A missed shot will more often than not wind up in the possession of the other team. Most baskets are for two points so if the passer who set up the shot is given half credit, that’s worth a point. One half of the blocked shots will likely have gone in and they are almost always two pointers, so that’s a point. If you add up the “positives”, (points, + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks) and subtract the “negatives”, (missed field goals, missed free throws, turnovers and fouls), you have a number that summarizes a player’s statistical contributions to a game. Then, by averaging the net points per 40 minutes of play, you factor out differences in playing time and have a look at the player’s rate of production. Both are important. The game is won based on what you actually did, not the rate at which you did it. But the rate is a better measure of the skills you can bring to the game.
Of course, there are things player do both on and off the court that contribute to victory. Leadership, hard work, keeping the team loose, scrambling for loose balls, (that could be a statistic: when neither team is in control of the ball, who winds up with it?), sneaker-sneaker defense, keeping the ball moving on offense, etc. etc. My experience is that with rare exceptions, the players who are the most statistically productive are the ones who grade highest in the things not measured by statistics, as well.
Here are the NET POINTS of our scholarship player in the most recent game and their averages per 40 minutes of play for the season, (exhibitions games not included):
C. J. Fair………………. 17NP in 39 minutes season: 286NP in 857 minutes per 40: 13.3
Jerami Grant……….. 14NP in 37 minutes season: 285NP in 696 minutes per 40: 16.4
Trevor Cooney…… 13NP in 33 minutes season: 281NP in 728 minutes per 40: 15.4
Rakeem Christmas 7NP in 26 minutes season: 174NP in 503 minutes per 40: 13.8
Michael Gbinije …. 4NP in 16 minutes season: 84NP in 288 minutes per 40: 11.7
Baye Moussa Keita 3NP in 5 minutes season: 80NP in 363 minutes per 40: 8.8
Tyler Ennis………….. 3NP in 35 minutes season: 312NP in 792 minutes per 40: 15.8
Ron Patterson…….. 0NP in 1 minutes season: 12NP in 50 minutes per 40: 9.6
B. J. Johnson……….. 0NP in 1 minutes season: 1NP in 51 minutes per 40: 0.8
Tyler Roberson……. -2NP in 7 minutes season: 19NP in 120 minutes per 40: 6.3
DaJuan Coleman…. 0NP in 0 minutes season: 61NP in 169 minutes per 40: 14.4
Comment: Ennis’s numbers are starting to sag slightly. It happened in the Wake Forest game. Tyler had 19 net points in the Duke game but it was a great offensive game for both teams. We had four players with more NP in that game. He had 11 in the Notre Dame game but 8 came on assists, mostly to Trevor Cooney. He has 3 in this game. He’s shot 5 for 16 from the field in these last two games.
Tyler Ennis has led in net points 9 times. Trevor Cooney has led 5 times, CJ Fair 4 Jerami Grant 3 times, Rakeem Christmas twice and DaJuan Coleman and now Baye Keita once each.
Possession:
Before you can score you’ve got to get the rock. Syracuse had 13 offensive and 16 defensive rebounds. They had 13 offensive and 18 defensive rebounds. When we missed we got the ball 13 of 31 times, (41.9%). When they missed, they got the ball 13 of 29 times (44.8%). We’ve averaged getting 40.5% of our misses and our opposition has gotten 31.7% of theirs. We have won the rebounding battle by this measure 16 times in 23 games
Of our 5 turnovers, 1 was their steals and 4 were our own miscues. Of their 13 turnovers, 6 were Syracuse steals and 7 were their fault. Syracuse has had fewer turnovers in 19 of 23 games, with two even. Overall we are ahead by 114 turnovers on the season, (212-326) and are also ahead in unforced errors, (113-125). We have had single digit turnovers in 8 of 10 ACC games and had only 10 in the other two. That’s very impressive for a team with a young backcourt.
If you add our 29 rebounds to their 13 turnovers, we had 42 “manufactured possessions”. They had 31 + 5 = 36, so we were +6. We’ve won that battle 20 times this season in 23 games, with an average margin of +10.0. We’ve won by double figures 13 times. It’s the main reason we are 23-0.
Shooting:
It’s still what the game is all about. And it won this game for us- but not on outside jump shots. We were 20 for 41, (.488) inside the arc, 4 for 13, (.308) outside it and 5 for 7 (.714) from the line. They were 9 for 26 (.346), 5/15 (.333) and 11/15 (.733). On the season, Syracuse is shooting .497/.361/.699, the opposition .455/.335/.661. We complain about our free throw shooting but we are now out-shooting the opposition on the year by 38 points. Here are our two point percentages for every year of this decade: 2009-10: .571-.462 (+109), 2010-11: .562-.444 (+118), 2011-12: .519-.425 (+94), 2012-13: .485-.425 (+60). So far this year: .497-.455 = +42.
We had 57 points, 32 in the paint, 12 from the arc and 5 from the line so we scored 8 points from what I’ll call the “Twilight Zone”: that area between the paint and the arc that is the land of the pull-up jump shot, a lost art but a great weapon. They had 44-14-15-11= 4 points in the Twilight Zone. Overall, we had 20 POP: Points Outside the Paint to 19 for them. So far this year Syracuse is averaging 24 POP, 8 from the TZ, the opposition 26/5.
10 of our 24 baskets were assisted (.417) and 7 of their 14 (.500). For the year we are assisting on 51.5% of our baskets to 63.8% for the opposition, who have had more assists or a higher percentage in 19 of 23 games, all of which we’ve won. Assists tend to come more often from jump shots than lay-ups or dunks so the more assists you get, the more you are settling for jumps shots to try to win the game which is often a bad strategy.
You compute “Offensive Efficiency” by taking field goal attempts – offensive rebounds + turnovers plus 47.5% of free throws attempted and dividing that into the number of points. We were 54 FGA - 13 OREBs + 5 TOs + (.475 x 7) = 49.325 possessions. They were 41 -13 + 13 + (.475 x 15) = 48.125 possessions. Since possessions shouldn’t be more than one off, I’ll count that as 49 possessions in which we scored 57 points, (1.163) and 48 possessions in which they scored 44 points, (0.917). For the year we are 1.165 vs. 0.959. We’ve been more efficient than our opposition in every game so far, which is also why we are 23-0. We’ve averaged 120 combined possessions per game this year. In this game, there were 97 possessions, the lowest combined total of the year. Clemson came in with a reputation as a great defensive team. Our offensive efficiency was right on our average for the year. We got plenty of good shots. Clemson doesn’t give up a lot of points simply because they play so slowly and hold the score down. They aren’t a great defensive team.
Every other level of basketball plays quarters. To check the consistency of our performance, I look at what the score was at the 10 minute mark of each half to see what the quarterly scores would be. At a minimum, I think we want to score at least 15 points in each quarter and try to hold the opposition to less than that. The quarterly breakdown for this game: 14-11, 17-11, 13-15, 13-7. The average for the season is: 16-13, 19-15, 17-15, 19-15. We’ve won 60 quarters, (and one overtime), lost 25 and tied 7. We’ve scored at least 15 in 67 of 92 quarters and held the opposition under that 49 times.
Hubert Davis once told us to “Get an offensive dude”. I decided to name an “Offensive Dude Of the Game, or an O-Dog, and use the hockey concept of points + assists. In this game CJ Fair had 19 points and 0 assists for 19 “hockey points”. So far Tyler Ennis has led 10 times and CJ Fair has done it 9 times, Trevor Cooney 5 times and Jerami Grant has done it twice, including ties.
I also like to keep track who sits us down in each half. Besides being fun it gives an indication of who Coach B likes to design plays for since opening possessions are more likely to be scripted than those later in the game, (although sometimes we don’t score until later in the gameCJ Fairsat us down in the first half with a jump shot at 1:16. Jerami Grant did in the second half with a lay-up 57 seconds in. CJ Fair has now sat us down 13 times, Tyler Ennis 9 times, Rakeem Christmas and Trevor Cooney 6 times, DaJuan Coleman 5 times and Jerami Grant 4 times, (remember he didn’t start until Coleman got hurt).
Longest: 8:50, second half vs. Miami. We were 4:51 vs. St. Francis, (second half), 3:12 vs. Villanova (first half) 2:37 vs. Notre Dame (first half), 2:29 vs. Eastern Michigan (second half), 2:13 vs. Pittsburgh (first half), 2:05 vs. North Carolina (second half), 1:45 vs. Boston College (first half), 1:38 vs. Pittsburgh (second half), 1:26 vs. Duke (first half), 1:25 vs. Wake Forest, (1st half), 1:21 vs. Duke (second half) 1:18 vs. North Carolina (first half) and 1:16 vs. Clemson (first half)
Last edited:
