Net Points, Etc. - Cornell | Syracusefan.com

Net Points, Etc. - Cornell

SWC75

Bored Historian
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,614
Like
64,699
I’ve added so many things to my post-game “Net Points” posts over the years that it’s become a very long post to read and a longer one to do. I’ve decided to have separate posts for the numbers for a particular game and for the cumulative season totals. It’s the later that takes most of the time and lengthens the post so much. There was too much verbiage and too many numbers.

I’m still going to figure the season totals but I’ll post them at three different stages of the season: after the pre-conference schedule, after the conference schedule and after the post season. In the meantime, I’ll go with this stream-lined version of “Net Points, etc.” after each game, with numbers and commentary only for that game. That should make it both quicker to do and more digestible.

Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)

Bourama Sidibe 11NP in 19 minutes
Matthew Moyer 11NP in 28 minutes
Tyus Battle 10NP in 28 minutes
Frank Howard 9NP in 24 minutes
Paschal Chukwu 8NP in 20 minutes
Marek Dolezaj 8NP in 23 minutes
Geno Thorpe 7NP in 19 minutes
Oshae Brissett 5NP in 24 minutes
Howard Washington 1NP in 10 minutes

Awards

Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)

Tyus Battle 18+1 = 19

Scoring Efficiency
(Points minus field goal and free throw attempts)

Tyus Battle 18 – 6mfg – 2mft = 8

Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half)

1st Half- Tyus Battle jumper 1:00 in
2nd Half- Paschal Chukwu lay-up 28 seconds in.

TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub)

Geno Thorpe with a fast-break lay-up with 1:48 left

My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)

Matthew Moyer played 28 minutes


Team Stats:

POSSESSION

Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)

We rebounded 21 of our 43 misses = 48.8%
They rebounded 14 of their 47 misses = 29.8%

Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)

We got 21 points on 21 O-Rebs = 1.000 points/O-reb
They got 13 points on 14 O-Rebs = 0.929 points/ O-reb

Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)

We had 8 turnovers – 1 steals = 7 unforced
They had 15 turnovers – 12 steals = 3 unforced

Points per Takeaway
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)

We had 16 points from 15 takeaways =1.067 points/takeaway
They had 2 points from 8 takeaways = 0.250 points/takeaway

Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeaway: [Second Chance Point + Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)

We had 37 points in 36 unsettled situations = 1.027 points/US
They had 15 points in 22 unsettled situations = 0.681 points.US

Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)

We had 54 + 15 = 69
They had 36 + 8 = 44


Scoring

Shooting
(shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)

We were 23 for 53 on twos, (43.4%), 6 for 17 on threes (35.3%) and 13 for 18 on frees (72.2%)
They were 9 for 25 on twos, (36.0%), 4 for 27 on threes (14.8%) and 15 for 26 on frees (57.7%)

Points
(PIP= points in the paint, POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP –free throws made, TREY: points from three point shots, TZ= Twilight Zone, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points POTO= points off turnovers)

We had 36 PIP, 28 POP, 18 TREY, 10 TZ, 10 FBP, 16 POTO
They had 16 PIP, 14 POP, 12 TREY, 2 TZ, 0 FBP, 2 POTO

First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made, courtesy of Pat. SCP is second chance points.)

We had 33 FCP and 21 SCP
They had 17 FCP and 13 SCP

Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)

Our starters scored 44 points and our bench scored 33 points
Their starters scored 32 points and their bench scored 12 points

Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)

We assisted 14 of our 29 field goals = 48.3%
They assisted 10 of their 13 field goals = 76.9%

Team Offensive Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)

We scored 77 points in 66 possessions = 1.167 points/possession
They scored 45 points in 65 possessions = 0.692 points/ possession

It was a 131 possession game.


Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)

16-6; 17-16; 21-10; 23-13


Fouls
(Two point shots, points in paint and free throws attempted per times fouled.)

We attempted 53 two point shots, scored 36 points in the paint, attempted 18 free throws and were fouled 15 times = 3.53; 2.40; 1.20
They attempted 25 two point shots, scored 16 points in the paint, attempted 26 free throws and were fouled 22 times = 1.14; 0.73; 1.18

Cornell was much more likely to draw a foul when shooting two point shots or in the paint. Both teams shot about the same number of free throws per foul.


Comments:

- It’s interesting that Matthew Moyer got the most minutes. If that becomes a trend, it would be an indication that JB values his hustle and rebounding over scoring, (MM scored 4 points in this game).

- Tyus Battle is clearly our #1 scoring option.

- We dominated virtually every statistic but the point sin “unsettle situations” (37-15) were big.

- +25 in “manufactured possessions” is also very big.

- We shot considerably better than Cornell from 2 point range, three point range and from the line. But making 43.4% of your two point shots is not an impressive number, especially against Cornell.

- Other positive numbers: +10 in fast break points and +8 from the Twilight Zone.

- Any time our bench out-scores the other team’s starter, we will be in pretty good shape.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
169,630
Messages
4,842,468
Members
5,981
Latest member
SYRtoBOS

Online statistics

Members online
30
Guests online
1,007
Total visitors
1,037


...
Top Bottom