SWC75
Bored Historian
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 33,723
- Like
- 64,923
I will again be doing a report after each game this season and a summary report at the end of the non-conference season, the ACC season and the post season.
Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)
Elijah Hughes +21NP in 38 minutes = +60/154 = +15.6NP/40 for season
Joe Girard +10NP in 36 minutes = +45/108 = +16.7NP/40 for season
Buddy Boeheim +9NP in 37 minutes = +39/135 = +11.6NP/40 for season
Quincy Guerrier +7NP in 16 minutes = +19/59 = +12.9NP/40 for season
Bourama Sidibie +7NP in 30 minutes = +35/99 = +9.3NP/40 for season
Marek Dolezaj +7NP in 34 minutes = +45/135 = +13.3NP/40 for season
Brycen Goodine +2NP in 7 minutes = +7/44 = +6.4NP/40 for season
Jesse Edwards 0NP in 2 minutes = +7/25 = +11.2NP/40 for season
DNP coach’s decision
Robert Braswell 0NP in 0 minutes = -2/8 = -10NP/40 for season
Howard Washington 0NP in 0 minutes = +5/7 = +28.6NP/40 for season
Injured
Jalen Carey 0NP in 0 minutes = -3/23 = -5.2NP/40 for season
Suspended
None
Redshirting
John Bol Ajak
Out for the year
None
Left Team
None
Awards
Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Elijah Hughes 22 points + 7 assists = 29
Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goal and free throw attempts)
Elijah Hughes 22 points – 7 mfg – 2 mft = +13
Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Quincy Guerrier 10 points of 15 = 66.7%
Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half?)
1st Half- Buddy Boeheim trey at 17.54 2nd Half- Marek Dolezaj lay-up at 19.27
TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub)
Elijah Hughes free throw at 1:10
My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Elijah Hughes 38 minutes
TEAM STATS
Possession
Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 12 of our 30 misses = 40.0%
They rebounded 6 of their 29 misses = 20.7%
Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 9 points on 12 O-Rebs = 0.750 points/O-reb
They got 4 points on 6 O-Rebs = 0.667 points/O-reb
Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 7 turnovers – 4 steals = 3 unforced
They had 9 turnovers – 2 steals = 7 unforced
Points per Takeaway
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 13 points from 9 takeaways = 1.444 points/takeaway
They had 7 points from 7 takeaways = 1.000 points/takeaway
Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeaway: [Second Chance Point + Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 21 points in 21 unsettled situations = 1.000 points
They had 11 points in 13 unsettled situations = 0.846 points
Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 35 + 9 = 44
They had 24 + 7 = 31
Hustle Stats
One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + steals + blocks. I decided to keep track of that, too:
We had 35 + 2 + 0 = 37
They had 24 + 4 + 1 = 29
Scoring
Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 15 for 26 on twos, (57.7%), 10 for 27 on threes (37.0%) and 12 for 18 on frees (66.7%)
They were 8 for 13 on twos, (61.5%), 6 for 27 on threes (22.2%) and 19 for 25 on frees (76.0%)
Combined percentages were: 1614 (577 + 370 + 667) vs. 1597 (615 + 222 + 760) = +17
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, (two point jumpers from outside the paint)
FBP = fast break points
POTO= points off turnovers
We had 24 PIP, 36 POP, 30 OL, 6 TZ, 13 POTO, 12 FBP
They had 14 PIP, 20 POP, 18 OL, 2 TZ, 7 POTO, 6 FBP
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 12 FBP in 25 opportunities (48.0%)
They scored 6 FBP in 23 opportunities (26.1%)
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 39 FCP and 9 SCP
They had 24 FCP and 4 SCP
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 48 points and our bench scored 24 points
Their starters scored 39 points and their bench scored 14 points
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 18 of our 25 field goals = 72.0%
They assisted 11 of their 14 field goals = 78.6%
Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 72 points in 56 possessions = 1.286 points/ possession
They scored 53 points in 55 possessions = 0.964 points/possession
It was a 111 possession game.
If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession:
We scored 72 points in 62 possessions = 1.161 points/ possession
They scored 53 points in 52 possessions = 1.019 points/possession
Team Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)
We scored 72 points, missed 28 field goals and 6 missed free throws = net +38
They scored 53 points, missed 26 field goals and 6 missed free throws = net +21
(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)
We scored 72 on 26 two point attempts, 27 three point attempts and 18 free throw attempts = 72 of a possible 151 points = 47.7% of possible points scored.
They scored 53 on 13 two point attempts, 27 three point attempts and 25 free throw attempts = 53 of a possible 132 points = 40.2% of possible points scored.
Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)
20-16, 6-9, 18-14, 28-14
Fouls
(Two point shots and free throws attempted per times fouled.)
We attempted 26 two point shots, attempted 18 free throws and were fouled 13 times = 2.00; 1.44
They attempted 18 two point shots, attempted 16 free throws and were fouled 16 times = 1.125; 1.00
They were more likely to get calls when attempting two point shots but we got more shots per foul.
Comments
- The Jalen Carey “keys to the car” experiment didn’t last very long. From the rumors, his career here may already be over.
- Two very unusual and concerning stats vs. a team like Cornell: They out-shot us on two point shows 61.5% to 57.&% and they got to the foul line 25 times to our 18, out-scoring us 19-12 from there. That means that our inside game is wanting at both ends of the court. It also means that our defense in the front of the zone is allowing too much penetration. If that’s a problem vs. Cornell, we’ll never make it through the ACC without getting burned inside on a regular basis.
- On the other hand our perimeter defense has been very good (31/168 on treys: 26.3%).
- We are also running, out-scoring the opposition 46-14 on fast breaks. We have ‘fast broke’ (?) on 37% of our opportunities, (d-rebs + blocks + steals) compared to 14% of the opposition.
- Despite the dismal stretch at the end of the first half and the slow pace, our offense was actually very efficient in this game, averaging 1.286 per possession. It was 1.219 vs. Seattle and 1.111 vs. Colgate. If do good while looking bad, what will you do when you look good?
Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)
Elijah Hughes +21NP in 38 minutes = +60/154 = +15.6NP/40 for season
Joe Girard +10NP in 36 minutes = +45/108 = +16.7NP/40 for season
Buddy Boeheim +9NP in 37 minutes = +39/135 = +11.6NP/40 for season
Quincy Guerrier +7NP in 16 minutes = +19/59 = +12.9NP/40 for season
Bourama Sidibie +7NP in 30 minutes = +35/99 = +9.3NP/40 for season
Marek Dolezaj +7NP in 34 minutes = +45/135 = +13.3NP/40 for season
Brycen Goodine +2NP in 7 minutes = +7/44 = +6.4NP/40 for season
Jesse Edwards 0NP in 2 minutes = +7/25 = +11.2NP/40 for season
DNP coach’s decision
Robert Braswell 0NP in 0 minutes = -2/8 = -10NP/40 for season
Howard Washington 0NP in 0 minutes = +5/7 = +28.6NP/40 for season
Injured
Jalen Carey 0NP in 0 minutes = -3/23 = -5.2NP/40 for season
Suspended
None
Redshirting
John Bol Ajak
Out for the year
None
Left Team
None
Awards
Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Elijah Hughes 22 points + 7 assists = 29
Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goal and free throw attempts)
Elijah Hughes 22 points – 7 mfg – 2 mft = +13
Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Quincy Guerrier 10 points of 15 = 66.7%
Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half?)
1st Half- Buddy Boeheim trey at 17.54 2nd Half- Marek Dolezaj lay-up at 19.27
TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub)
Elijah Hughes free throw at 1:10
My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Elijah Hughes 38 minutes
TEAM STATS
Possession
Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 12 of our 30 misses = 40.0%
They rebounded 6 of their 29 misses = 20.7%
Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 9 points on 12 O-Rebs = 0.750 points/O-reb
They got 4 points on 6 O-Rebs = 0.667 points/O-reb
Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 7 turnovers – 4 steals = 3 unforced
They had 9 turnovers – 2 steals = 7 unforced
Points per Takeaway
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 13 points from 9 takeaways = 1.444 points/takeaway
They had 7 points from 7 takeaways = 1.000 points/takeaway
Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeaway: [Second Chance Point + Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 21 points in 21 unsettled situations = 1.000 points
They had 11 points in 13 unsettled situations = 0.846 points
Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 35 + 9 = 44
They had 24 + 7 = 31
Hustle Stats
One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + steals + blocks. I decided to keep track of that, too:
We had 35 + 2 + 0 = 37
They had 24 + 4 + 1 = 29
Scoring
Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 15 for 26 on twos, (57.7%), 10 for 27 on threes (37.0%) and 12 for 18 on frees (66.7%)
They were 8 for 13 on twos, (61.5%), 6 for 27 on threes (22.2%) and 19 for 25 on frees (76.0%)
Combined percentages were: 1614 (577 + 370 + 667) vs. 1597 (615 + 222 + 760) = +17
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, (two point jumpers from outside the paint)
FBP = fast break points
POTO= points off turnovers
We had 24 PIP, 36 POP, 30 OL, 6 TZ, 13 POTO, 12 FBP
They had 14 PIP, 20 POP, 18 OL, 2 TZ, 7 POTO, 6 FBP
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 12 FBP in 25 opportunities (48.0%)
They scored 6 FBP in 23 opportunities (26.1%)
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 39 FCP and 9 SCP
They had 24 FCP and 4 SCP
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 48 points and our bench scored 24 points
Their starters scored 39 points and their bench scored 14 points
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 18 of our 25 field goals = 72.0%
They assisted 11 of their 14 field goals = 78.6%
Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 72 points in 56 possessions = 1.286 points/ possession
They scored 53 points in 55 possessions = 0.964 points/possession
It was a 111 possession game.
If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession:
We scored 72 points in 62 possessions = 1.161 points/ possession
They scored 53 points in 52 possessions = 1.019 points/possession
Team Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)
We scored 72 points, missed 28 field goals and 6 missed free throws = net +38
They scored 53 points, missed 26 field goals and 6 missed free throws = net +21
(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)
We scored 72 on 26 two point attempts, 27 three point attempts and 18 free throw attempts = 72 of a possible 151 points = 47.7% of possible points scored.
They scored 53 on 13 two point attempts, 27 three point attempts and 25 free throw attempts = 53 of a possible 132 points = 40.2% of possible points scored.
Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)
20-16, 6-9, 18-14, 28-14
Fouls
(Two point shots and free throws attempted per times fouled.)
We attempted 26 two point shots, attempted 18 free throws and were fouled 13 times = 2.00; 1.44
They attempted 18 two point shots, attempted 16 free throws and were fouled 16 times = 1.125; 1.00
They were more likely to get calls when attempting two point shots but we got more shots per foul.
Comments
- The Jalen Carey “keys to the car” experiment didn’t last very long. From the rumors, his career here may already be over.
- Two very unusual and concerning stats vs. a team like Cornell: They out-shot us on two point shows 61.5% to 57.&% and they got to the foul line 25 times to our 18, out-scoring us 19-12 from there. That means that our inside game is wanting at both ends of the court. It also means that our defense in the front of the zone is allowing too much penetration. If that’s a problem vs. Cornell, we’ll never make it through the ACC without getting burned inside on a regular basis.
- On the other hand our perimeter defense has been very good (31/168 on treys: 26.3%).
- We are also running, out-scoring the opposition 46-14 on fast breaks. We have ‘fast broke’ (?) on 37% of our opportunities, (d-rebs + blocks + steals) compared to 14% of the opposition.
- Despite the dismal stretch at the end of the first half and the slow pace, our offense was actually very efficient in this game, averaging 1.286 per possession. It was 1.219 vs. Seattle and 1.111 vs. Colgate. If do good while looking bad, what will you do when you look good?