SWC75
Bored Historian
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 33,617
- Like
- 64,702
Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)
Paschal Chukwu 25NP in 37 minutes
Tyus Battle 21NP in 40 minutes
Oshae Brissett 14NP in 40 minutes
Frank Howard 12NP in 39 minutes
Marek Dolezaj 4NP in 17 minutes
Matthew Moyer 1NP in 17 minutes
Howard Washington 1NP in 10minutes
DNP coach’s decision
None
Injured or suspended
Bourama Sidibe
Left team
Geno Thorpe
Awards
Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Tyus Battle 22p + 4a = 26
Scoring Efficiency
(Points minus field goal and free throw attempts)
Tyus Battle 22p – 8mfg – 1mft = 13
Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half)
1st Half- Tyus Battle jumper 2:00 in
2nd Half- Frank Howard lay-up 2:17 in
TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub)
No tacos for us.
My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Tyus Battle and Oshae Brissett 40 minutes
(Oshae got 40- meaning he was out for less than a minute but he played IN 40 minutes so I’ll count it. Frank Howard was out for a full minute and is stuck at 39.)
Team Stats:
(I’ve decided to put the team that won the stat in bold and ties in italics.)
POSSESSION
Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 11 of our 32 misses = 34.4%
They rebounded 9 of their 36 misses = 25.0%
Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 10 points on 11 O-Rebs = 0.909 points/O-reb
They got 12 points on 9 O-Rebs = 1.333 points/ O-reb
Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 11 turnovers – 7 steals = 4 unforced
They had 14 turnovers – 9 steals = 5 unforced
Points per Takeaway
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 16 points from 14 takeaways = 1.143 points/takeaway
They had 13 points from 11 takeaways = 1.182 points/takeaway
Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeaway: [Second Chance Point + Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 26 points in 25 unsettled situations = 1.040 points
They had 25 points in 20 unsettled situations = 1.250 points
Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 38 + 14 = 52
They had 30 + 11= 41
Scoring
Shooting
(shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 12 for 26 on twos, (46.2%), 6 for 20 on threes (30.0%) and 20 for 26 on frees (76.9%)
They were 17 for 39 on twos, (43.6%), 3 for 15 on threes (20.0%) and 4 for 6 on frees (66.7%)
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP –free throws made, TREY: points from three point shots, TZ= Twilight Zone, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points POTO= points off turnovers)
We had 20 PIP, 22 POP, 18 TREY, 4 TZ, 13 POTO, 8 FBP
They had 28 PIP, 15 POP, 9 TREY, 6 TZ, 16 POTO, 8 FBP
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 8 FBP in 44 opportunities (18.2%)
They scored 8 FBP in 31 opportunities (25.8%)
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 24 FCP and 10 SCP
They had 23 FCP and 12 SCP
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 59 points and our bench scored 3 points
Their starters scored 42 points and their bench scored 5 points
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 11 of our 20 field goals = 55.0%
They assisted 13 of their 18 field goals = 72.2%
Team Offensive Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 62 points in 60 possessions = 1.033 points/ possession
They scored 47 points in 61 possessions = 0.770 points/possession
It was a 121 possession game
Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)
8-11, 16-13, 19-17, 19-6
Fouls
(Two point shots, points in paint and free throws attempted per times fouled.)
We attempted 26 two point shots, scored 20 points in the paint, attempted 26 free throws and were fouled 19 times = 1.37; 1.05; 1.37
They attempted 39 two point shots, scored 28 points in the paint, attempted 6 free throws and were fouled 7 times = 5.57; 4.00; 0.86
Our numbers were in the normal range but Eastern Michigan’s were way out of whack: they couldn’t get a call and when they did they didn’t go to the line as much.
Comments:
- Tyus Battle came back from a -6NP game with a 21NP’er.
- We out-rebounded 12 of our 13 pre-conference opponents. It will be interesting to see how well that holds up in the ACC.
- In the first half we were 3 for 9 on two point shots, (and 2 for 12 on threes). They were 9 for 18 and 2 for 9. The taller team was shooting more form outside and scoring less inside. In the second half we turned it around: 9 for 17 and 4 for 8 while EMU was 8 for 21 and 1 for 6.
- We finally got a fast break going late in the game and wound up with 8FBP, the most since the Maryland game. But EMU had as many in fewer opportunities. On the season we have bene out-scored on the break, 72-88, despite having more opportunities, 554-422. And this is the weaker part of the schedule, the teams that we should be able to run on the most.
- We never fell significantly behind so we never used the press, which has been an effective weapon for us.
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)
Paschal Chukwu 25NP in 37 minutes
Tyus Battle 21NP in 40 minutes
Oshae Brissett 14NP in 40 minutes
Frank Howard 12NP in 39 minutes
Marek Dolezaj 4NP in 17 minutes
Matthew Moyer 1NP in 17 minutes
Howard Washington 1NP in 10minutes
DNP coach’s decision
None
Injured or suspended
Bourama Sidibe
Left team
Geno Thorpe
Awards
Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Tyus Battle 22p + 4a = 26
Scoring Efficiency
(Points minus field goal and free throw attempts)
Tyus Battle 22p – 8mfg – 1mft = 13
Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half)
1st Half- Tyus Battle jumper 2:00 in
2nd Half- Frank Howard lay-up 2:17 in
TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub)
No tacos for us.
My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Tyus Battle and Oshae Brissett 40 minutes
(Oshae got 40- meaning he was out for less than a minute but he played IN 40 minutes so I’ll count it. Frank Howard was out for a full minute and is stuck at 39.)
Team Stats:
(I’ve decided to put the team that won the stat in bold and ties in italics.)
POSSESSION
Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 11 of our 32 misses = 34.4%
They rebounded 9 of their 36 misses = 25.0%
Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 10 points on 11 O-Rebs = 0.909 points/O-reb
They got 12 points on 9 O-Rebs = 1.333 points/ O-reb
Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 11 turnovers – 7 steals = 4 unforced
They had 14 turnovers – 9 steals = 5 unforced
Points per Takeaway
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 16 points from 14 takeaways = 1.143 points/takeaway
They had 13 points from 11 takeaways = 1.182 points/takeaway
Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeaway: [Second Chance Point + Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 26 points in 25 unsettled situations = 1.040 points
They had 25 points in 20 unsettled situations = 1.250 points
Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 38 + 14 = 52
They had 30 + 11= 41
Scoring
Shooting
(shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 12 for 26 on twos, (46.2%), 6 for 20 on threes (30.0%) and 20 for 26 on frees (76.9%)
They were 17 for 39 on twos, (43.6%), 3 for 15 on threes (20.0%) and 4 for 6 on frees (66.7%)
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP –free throws made, TREY: points from three point shots, TZ= Twilight Zone, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points POTO= points off turnovers)
We had 20 PIP, 22 POP, 18 TREY, 4 TZ, 13 POTO, 8 FBP
They had 28 PIP, 15 POP, 9 TREY, 6 TZ, 16 POTO, 8 FBP
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 8 FBP in 44 opportunities (18.2%)
They scored 8 FBP in 31 opportunities (25.8%)
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 24 FCP and 10 SCP
They had 23 FCP and 12 SCP
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 59 points and our bench scored 3 points
Their starters scored 42 points and their bench scored 5 points
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 11 of our 20 field goals = 55.0%
They assisted 13 of their 18 field goals = 72.2%
Team Offensive Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 62 points in 60 possessions = 1.033 points/ possession
They scored 47 points in 61 possessions = 0.770 points/possession
It was a 121 possession game
Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)
8-11, 16-13, 19-17, 19-6
Fouls
(Two point shots, points in paint and free throws attempted per times fouled.)
We attempted 26 two point shots, scored 20 points in the paint, attempted 26 free throws and were fouled 19 times = 1.37; 1.05; 1.37
They attempted 39 two point shots, scored 28 points in the paint, attempted 6 free throws and were fouled 7 times = 5.57; 4.00; 0.86
Our numbers were in the normal range but Eastern Michigan’s were way out of whack: they couldn’t get a call and when they did they didn’t go to the line as much.
Comments:
- Tyus Battle came back from a -6NP game with a 21NP’er.
- We out-rebounded 12 of our 13 pre-conference opponents. It will be interesting to see how well that holds up in the ACC.
- In the first half we were 3 for 9 on two point shots, (and 2 for 12 on threes). They were 9 for 18 and 2 for 9. The taller team was shooting more form outside and scoring less inside. In the second half we turned it around: 9 for 17 and 4 for 8 while EMU was 8 for 21 and 1 for 6.
- We finally got a fast break going late in the game and wound up with 8FBP, the most since the Maryland game. But EMU had as many in fewer opportunities. On the season we have bene out-scored on the break, 72-88, despite having more opportunities, 554-422. And this is the weaker part of the schedule, the teams that we should be able to run on the most.
- We never fell significantly behind so we never used the press, which has been an effective weapon for us.
Last edited: