Net Points, etc. for Wake Forest | Syracusefan.com

Net Points, etc. for Wake Forest

SWC75

Bored Historian
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,595
Like
64,676
Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)

Andrew White 20 in 40 minutes
Tyler Lydon 19 in 40 minutes
Taurean Thompson 17 in 21 minutes
John Gillon 10 in 29 minutes
Tyus Battle 8 in 40 minutes
Franklin Howard 3 in 11 minute
Tyler Roberson 2 in 7 minutes
DaJuan Coleman -4 in 12 minutes

Paschal Chukwu injured

Awards

Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Andrew White 28

Scoring Efficiency
(Points minus field goal and free throw attempts)
Andrew White 18

Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half)
1st Half- Tyus Battle with a lay-up 19:21
2nd Half- Taurean Thompson with a lay-up 18:56

TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub)
Andrew White with a they, (yes, THAT one) with 1:23 left

My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Tyus Battle, Tyler Lydon and Andrew White 40 minutes


Team Stats:

POSSESSION

Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 10 of our 33 misses = 30.3%
They rebounded 14 of their 36 misses = 38.9%

Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 17 points on 10 O-Rebs =1.70 points
They got 21 points on 14 O-Rebs = 1.50 points

Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 10 turnovers – 4 steals = 6 unforced
They had 12 turnovers – 8 steals = 4 unforced

Points per Takeaway
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 14 points from 10 takeaways = 1.40 points
They had 10 points from 12 takeaways =0.83 points

Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeaway: [Second Chance Point + Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 31 points in 20 unsettled situations = 1.55
They had 31 points in 26 unsettled situations = 1.19

Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 32 + 12= 44
They had 37 + 10 = 47


Scoring

Shooting
(shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 16 for 30 on twos, (.533), 9 for 24 on threes (.375) and 22 for 30 on frees (.733)
They were 19 for 35 on twos, (.543), 7 for 24 on threes (.292) and 17 for 23 on frees (.739)

Points
(PIP= points in the paint, POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP –free throws made, TREY: points from three point shots, TZ= Twilight Zone, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points POTO= points off turnovers)
We had 26 PIP, 33 POP, 27 TREY, 6 TZ, 14 FBP, 14 POTO
They had 26 PIP, 33 POP, 21 TREY, 12 TZ, 4 FBP, 10 POTO

First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made, courtesy of Pat. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 28 FCP and 17 SCP
They had 34 FCP and 21 SCP

Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 57 points and our bench scored 9 points
Their starters scored 77 points and their bench scored 7 points

Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 18 of our 25 field goals, 72.0%
They assisted 16 of their 26 field goals 61.5%

Team Offensive Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 81 points in 68 possessions = 1.191 points/possession
They scored 76 points in 68 possessions = 1.118 points/ possession
It was a 136 possession game

Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)
16-20, 13-12, 20-23, 32-21


Fouls
(Two point shots, points in paint and free throws attempted per times fouled.)
We attempted 30 two point shots, scored 26 points in the paint, attempted 30 free throws and were fouled 25 times = 1.20, 1.04, 1.20
They attempted 35 two point shots, scored 26 points in the paint, attempted 23 free throws and were fouled 19 times = 1.84, 1.37, 1.21


Comments:

- This was the first time since the Virginia Tech game that someone other than Tyler Lydon led in net points.

- We’ve been out-rebounded four games in a row and not necessarily against teams noted for rebounding.

- The teams had 38 second chance points from 24 offensive rebounds, a combined rate of 1.58 points per O-reb, easily the highest of the season.

- A big key to winning was that while Notre Dame made 42% of their threes, Wake made only 29%. And they were well-defended. When we get out on the shooters our chances of victory improve dramatically.

- The two teams have the same number of points in (26) and out (33) of the paint.

- We complained about the officiating but we were much more likely to draw a foul on two point shots and points in the paint than Wake, (who got whistled 25 times), was.

- We got out-scored 45-56 in First and Second Chance Points. We won because we were +10 on fast breaks and +5 on free throws. (Yeah, I know that doesn’t add up but looking at the box score and Pat’s formula for FCP, that’s what I come up with. Anyway we won. )
 

Forum statistics

Threads
169,566
Messages
4,839,953
Members
5,981
Latest member
SYRtoBOS

Online statistics

Members online
37
Guests online
969
Total visitors
1,006


...
Top Bottom