SWC75
Bored Historian
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 33,835
- Like
- 65,215
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP –free throws made, TREY: points from three point shots, TZ= Twilight Zone, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points POTO= points off turnovers)
PIP “The Inner Sanctum”
Bryant 26-32
Niagara 40-9
Rider 20-10
Rutgers 30-32
Boston College 38-24
Northeastern 32-16
Buffalo 58-58
Pittsburgh 12-28
Georgetown 20-20
North Carolina 24-42
Pittsburgh II 38-40
Miami 32-28
Virginia Tech 46-24
Virginia 22-26
NC State 36-40
Clemson 24-26
NC State II 28-20
Bost College II 38-20
Notre Dame 28-26
Duke 36-30
Georgia Tech 24-54
No Carolina II 32-38
Clemson II 20-14
NC State III 32-24
Virginia II 22-18
San Diego State 14-26
West Virginia 20-26
Houston 16-30
TOTALS: 808-781
We were 11-2 when we won this stat, 1-1 when it was even and 6-7 when we lost it. That makes sense. It’s not our strength so when we won it, we have an extra edge. It’s interesting that we lead in points in the paint on the season, even with an abbreviated non-conference schedule and no center.
POP (Points Outside the Paint)
Bryant 44-43
Niagara 19-20
Rider 51-31
Rutgers 25-33
Boston College 52-30
Northeastern 8-29
Buffalo 17-29
Pittsburgh 44-25
Georgetown 43-39
North Carolina 42-21
Pittsburgh II 19-30
Miami 42-20
Virginia Tech 14-24
Virginia 27-46
NC State 30-20
Clemson 17-38
NC State II 37-28
Bost College II 19-35
Notre Dame 36-38
Duke 28-39
Georgia Tech 39-17
No Carolina II 30-18
Clemson II 32-36
NC State III 50-25
Virginia II 34-43
San Diego State 53-26
West Virginia 48-37
Houston 17-23
TOTALS: 917-843
We were 11-2 when we won points in the paint and 11-3 when we won points outside the paint, 7-7 when we didn’t. Just score, baby!
Trey “The Outer Limits”
Bryant 30-39
Niagara 18-15
Rider 45-21
Rutgers 21-27
Boston College 48-24
Northeastern 6-27
Buffalo 9-27
Pittsburgh 36-21
Georgetown 27-33
North Carolina 30-15
Pittsburgh II 9-24
Miami 30-12
Virginia Tech 12-24
Virginia 15-42
NC State 24-18
Clemson 15-30
NC State II 27-24
Bost College II 15-27
Notre Dame 30-36
Duke 24-39
Georgia Tech 21-15
No Carolina II 24-12
Clemson II 30-30
NC State III 42-21
Virginia II 24-33
San Diego State 45-33
West Virginia 42-33
Houston 15-21
TOTALS: 711-726
We were 10-3 when we hit more threes, 1-0 when we were even and 7-7 when we lost it. So being out-shot from three wasn’t a death sentence.
“The Twilight Zone” – between the paint and the three point line
Bryant 14-4
Niagara 2-4
Rider 6-10
Rutgers 4-6
Boston College 4-6
Northeastern 2-2
Buffalo 8-2
Pittsburgh 8-4
Georgetown 16-6
North Carolina 12-6
Pittsburgh II 10-6
Miami 12-8
Virginia Tech 2-0
Virginia 12-4
NC State 6-2
Clemson 2-8
NC State II 10-4
Bost College II 4-8
Notre Dame 6-2
Duke 4-12
Georgia Tech 18-2
No Carolina II 6-6
Clemson II 2-6
NC State III 8-4
Virginia II 10-10
San Diego State 8-0
West Virginia 6-4
Houston 2-2
TOTALS: 206-117
We were 10-5 when we out-scored teams from between the paint and the arc, 1-1 when it was even and 7-4 when we were out-scored from there. That’s not a huge advent age, even if an extra 89 points in a season full of close games seems like a lot.
POTO
Bryant 15-12
Niagara 22-8
Rider 18-5
Rutgers 16-12
Boston College 24-12
Northeastern 19-10
Buffalo 15-11
Pittsburgh 13-10
Georgetown 11-14
North Carolina 12-9
Pittsburgh II 7-9
Miami 27-3
Virginia Tech 11-7
Virginia 10-17
NC State 8-14
Clemson 12-8
NC State II 21-16
Bost College II 14-11
Notre Dame 10-10
Duke 16-30
Georgia Tech 23-28
No Carolina II 28-9
Clemson II 7-6
NC State III 14-8
Virginia II 17-8
San Diego State 4-10
West Virginia 4-21
Houston 6-18
TOTALS: 404-336
We were 13-5 when we won this stat, 1-0 when we tied and 4-5 when we lost it. What is strange is how badly we lost it in the NCAA tournament: 16-49, after dominating it before that: 388-287.
FBP
Bryant 29-22
Niagara 24-9
Rider 22-13
Rutgers 14-21
Boston College 21-11
Northeastern 26-8
Buffalo 25-21
Pittsburgh 9-13
Georgetown 14-11
North Carolina 11-11
Pittsburgh II 6-18
Miami 14-11
Virginia Tech 11-1
Virginia 6-9
NC State 8-14
Clemson 3-3
NC State II 12-9
Bost College II 15-11
Notre Dame 12-16
Duke 13-14
Georgia Tech 17-19
No Carolina II 20-9
Clemson II 19-11
NC State III 8-10
Virginia II 15-2
San Diego State 3-5
West Virginia 14-15
Houston 0-8
TOTALS: 391-325
We were 13-0 when we won this stat. 13-0! We were 0-2 when it was even and 5-8 when we lost it. 10 of the 13 times we won the stat were at home. Do we tend to run more at home than on the road?
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
Bryant 29/45 = 64.4% vs. 22/44 = 50.0%
Niagara 24/31 = 77.4% vs. 9/20 = 45.0%
Rider 22/49 = 44.9% vs. 13/29 = 44.8%
Rutgers 14/30 = 46.7% vs. 21/37 = 56.8%
Boston College 21/41 = 51.2% vs. 11/29 = 37.9%
Northeastern 26/36 = 72.2% vs. 8/39 = 20.5%
Buffalo 25/47 = 53.2% vs. 21/34 = 61.8%
Pittsburgh 9/41 = 22.0% vs. 13/32 = 40.6%
Georgetown 11/35 = 31.4% vs. 14/36 = 38.9%
North Carolina 11/37 = 29.7% vs. 11/37 = 29.7%
Pittsburgh II 6/22 = 27.3% vs. 18/24 = 75.0%
Miami 14/43 = 32.6% vs. 11/34 = 32.4%
Virginia Tech 11/42 = 26.2% vs. 1/22 = 4.5%
Virginia 6/35 = 17.1% vs. 9/46 = 19.6%
NC State 8/38 = 21.1% vs. 14/36 = 19.6%
Clemson 3/36 = 0.83% vs. 3/44 = 0.68%
NC State II 12/33 = 36.4% vs. 9/29 = 31.0%
Bost College II 15/46 = 32.6% vs. 11/35 = 31.4%
Notre Dame 12/38 = 31.6% vs. 16/29 = 55.2%
Duke 13/34 = 38.2% vs. 14/39 = 35.9%
Georgia Tech 17/33 = 51.5% vs. 19/36 = 52.8%)
No Carolina II 20/37 = 54.1% vs. 9/33 = 27.3%
Clemson II 19/34 = 29.4% vs. 11/32 = 34.4%
NC State III 8/34 = 23.5% vs. 10/22 = 45.5%
Virginia II 15/28 = 53.6% vs. 2/35 = 5.7%
San Diego State 3/37 = 8.1% vs. 5/25 = 20.0%
West Virginia 14/37 = 37.8% vs. 15/31 = 48.4%
Houston 0/33 = 0.0% vs. 8/41 = 19.5%
TOTALS: 391/1032 = 37.9% 325/930 = 34.9%
We were 11-0 when we did a better job of taking advantage of fast brake opportunities, lost the one time it was even and were 7-10 when the opposition took better advantage. Conversely we took better advantage just once in our last 10 games but won 6 of those games and played our best ball of the year during that time.
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
FCP
Bryant 30-44
Niagara 21-31
Rider 47-23
Rutgers 31-35
Boston College 60-36
Northeastern 2-32
Buffalo 34-55
Pittsburgh 44-19
Georgetown 38-41
North Carolina 51-28
Pittsburgh II 38-34
Miami 50-31
Virginia Tech 33-34
Virginia 38-56
NC State 50-33
Clemson 27-43
NC State II 38-15
Bost College II 34-32
Notre Dame 24-42
Duke 27-37
Georgia Tech 32-41
No Carolina II 32-22
Clemson II 28-33
NC State III 66-25
Virginia II 24-50
San Diego State 60-44
West Virginia 50-34
Houston 46-62
TOTALS: 1055-1012
We were 10-3 when we outscored the opposition against set defenses, 7-7 when we didn’t. Interesting that scoring off fast breaks was a more important stat.
SCP
Bryant 11-9
Niagara 14-2
Rider 2-5
Rutgers 10-9
Boston College 9-7
Northeastern 12-5
Buffalo 16-11
Pittsburgh 3-21
Georgetown 11-7
North Carolina 4-24
Pittsburgh II 13-18
Miami 10-6
Virginia Tech 16-13
Virginia 5-7
NC State 8-13
Clemson 11-18
NC State II 15-8
Bost College II 8-12
Notre Dame 16-5
Duke 24-16
Georgia Tech 14-11
No Carolina II 10-25
Clemson II 5-6
NC State III 8-14
Virginia II 17-9
San Diego State 4-10
West Virginia 4-14
Houston 5-3
TOTALS 285-308
We were 11-4 when we won this stat, 7-6 when we lost it. But we won it only twice in the last 7 games – and lost the two games in that stretch where we won the stat.
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Starter Scoring
Bryant 66-58
Niagara 64-24
Rider 66-42
Rutgers 61-68
Boston College 80-23
Northeastern 55-33
Buffalo 94-54
Pittsburgh 43-45
Georgetown 71-55
North Carolina 69-52
Pittsburgh II 74-89
Miami 69-42
Virginia Tech 65-41
Virginia 53-72
NC State 62-59
Clemson 57-44
NC State II 64-49
Bost College II 68-50
Notre Dame 66-59
Duke 52-75
Georgia Tech 63-81
No Carolina II 60-47
Clemson II 54-26
NC State III 72-17
Virginia II 57-62
San Diego State 56-50
West Virginia 64-59
Houston 36-50
TOTAL 1761-1426
We were 18-2 when our starters out-scored theirs, 0-8 when we didn’t. obviously the product of a shorter rotation: our starters have to outscore theirs because they are on the court more or we’ve got no chance.
Bench Scoring
Bryant 19-26
Niagara 11-21
Rider 21-10
Rutgers 8-11
Boston College 21-40
Northeastern 7-23
Buffalo 13-42
Pittsburgh 17-18
Georgetown 3-14
North Carolina 6-29
Pittsburgh II 2-7
Miami 14-15
Virginia Tech 13-19
Virginia 5-9
NC State 14-14
Clemson 4-34
NC State II 28-20
Bost College II 7-17
Notre Dame 9-8
Duke 19-10
Georgia Tech 14-3
No Carolina II 12-23
Clemson II 10-28
NC State III 17-15
Virginia II 12-10
San Diego State 22-12
West Virginia 11-13
Houston 10-12
TOTALS: 334-558
We were 5-3 when our bench outscored theirs, won the one even game and were 12-7 when we didn’t. How our starters did had a lot more to do with winning than how our reserves did.
(PIP= points in the paint, POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP –free throws made, TREY: points from three point shots, TZ= Twilight Zone, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points POTO= points off turnovers)
PIP “The Inner Sanctum”
Bryant 26-32
Niagara 40-9
Rider 20-10
Rutgers 30-32
Boston College 38-24
Northeastern 32-16
Buffalo 58-58
Pittsburgh 12-28
Georgetown 20-20
North Carolina 24-42
Pittsburgh II 38-40
Miami 32-28
Virginia Tech 46-24
Virginia 22-26
NC State 36-40
Clemson 24-26
NC State II 28-20
Bost College II 38-20
Notre Dame 28-26
Duke 36-30
Georgia Tech 24-54
No Carolina II 32-38
Clemson II 20-14
NC State III 32-24
Virginia II 22-18
San Diego State 14-26
West Virginia 20-26
Houston 16-30
TOTALS: 808-781
We were 11-2 when we won this stat, 1-1 when it was even and 6-7 when we lost it. That makes sense. It’s not our strength so when we won it, we have an extra edge. It’s interesting that we lead in points in the paint on the season, even with an abbreviated non-conference schedule and no center.
POP (Points Outside the Paint)
Bryant 44-43
Niagara 19-20
Rider 51-31
Rutgers 25-33
Boston College 52-30
Northeastern 8-29
Buffalo 17-29
Pittsburgh 44-25
Georgetown 43-39
North Carolina 42-21
Pittsburgh II 19-30
Miami 42-20
Virginia Tech 14-24
Virginia 27-46
NC State 30-20
Clemson 17-38
NC State II 37-28
Bost College II 19-35
Notre Dame 36-38
Duke 28-39
Georgia Tech 39-17
No Carolina II 30-18
Clemson II 32-36
NC State III 50-25
Virginia II 34-43
San Diego State 53-26
West Virginia 48-37
Houston 17-23
TOTALS: 917-843
We were 11-2 when we won points in the paint and 11-3 when we won points outside the paint, 7-7 when we didn’t. Just score, baby!
Trey “The Outer Limits”
Bryant 30-39
Niagara 18-15
Rider 45-21
Rutgers 21-27
Boston College 48-24
Northeastern 6-27
Buffalo 9-27
Pittsburgh 36-21
Georgetown 27-33
North Carolina 30-15
Pittsburgh II 9-24
Miami 30-12
Virginia Tech 12-24
Virginia 15-42
NC State 24-18
Clemson 15-30
NC State II 27-24
Bost College II 15-27
Notre Dame 30-36
Duke 24-39
Georgia Tech 21-15
No Carolina II 24-12
Clemson II 30-30
NC State III 42-21
Virginia II 24-33
San Diego State 45-33
West Virginia 42-33
Houston 15-21
TOTALS: 711-726
We were 10-3 when we hit more threes, 1-0 when we were even and 7-7 when we lost it. So being out-shot from three wasn’t a death sentence.
“The Twilight Zone” – between the paint and the three point line
Bryant 14-4
Niagara 2-4
Rider 6-10
Rutgers 4-6
Boston College 4-6
Northeastern 2-2
Buffalo 8-2
Pittsburgh 8-4
Georgetown 16-6
North Carolina 12-6
Pittsburgh II 10-6
Miami 12-8
Virginia Tech 2-0
Virginia 12-4
NC State 6-2
Clemson 2-8
NC State II 10-4
Bost College II 4-8
Notre Dame 6-2
Duke 4-12
Georgia Tech 18-2
No Carolina II 6-6
Clemson II 2-6
NC State III 8-4
Virginia II 10-10
San Diego State 8-0
West Virginia 6-4
Houston 2-2
TOTALS: 206-117
We were 10-5 when we out-scored teams from between the paint and the arc, 1-1 when it was even and 7-4 when we were out-scored from there. That’s not a huge advent age, even if an extra 89 points in a season full of close games seems like a lot.
POTO
Bryant 15-12
Niagara 22-8
Rider 18-5
Rutgers 16-12
Boston College 24-12
Northeastern 19-10
Buffalo 15-11
Pittsburgh 13-10
Georgetown 11-14
North Carolina 12-9
Pittsburgh II 7-9
Miami 27-3
Virginia Tech 11-7
Virginia 10-17
NC State 8-14
Clemson 12-8
NC State II 21-16
Bost College II 14-11
Notre Dame 10-10
Duke 16-30
Georgia Tech 23-28
No Carolina II 28-9
Clemson II 7-6
NC State III 14-8
Virginia II 17-8
San Diego State 4-10
West Virginia 4-21
Houston 6-18
TOTALS: 404-336
We were 13-5 when we won this stat, 1-0 when we tied and 4-5 when we lost it. What is strange is how badly we lost it in the NCAA tournament: 16-49, after dominating it before that: 388-287.
FBP
Bryant 29-22
Niagara 24-9
Rider 22-13
Rutgers 14-21
Boston College 21-11
Northeastern 26-8
Buffalo 25-21
Pittsburgh 9-13
Georgetown 14-11
North Carolina 11-11
Pittsburgh II 6-18
Miami 14-11
Virginia Tech 11-1
Virginia 6-9
NC State 8-14
Clemson 3-3
NC State II 12-9
Bost College II 15-11
Notre Dame 12-16
Duke 13-14
Georgia Tech 17-19
No Carolina II 20-9
Clemson II 19-11
NC State III 8-10
Virginia II 15-2
San Diego State 3-5
West Virginia 14-15
Houston 0-8
TOTALS: 391-325
We were 13-0 when we won this stat. 13-0! We were 0-2 when it was even and 5-8 when we lost it. 10 of the 13 times we won the stat were at home. Do we tend to run more at home than on the road?
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
Bryant 29/45 = 64.4% vs. 22/44 = 50.0%
Niagara 24/31 = 77.4% vs. 9/20 = 45.0%
Rider 22/49 = 44.9% vs. 13/29 = 44.8%
Rutgers 14/30 = 46.7% vs. 21/37 = 56.8%
Boston College 21/41 = 51.2% vs. 11/29 = 37.9%
Northeastern 26/36 = 72.2% vs. 8/39 = 20.5%
Buffalo 25/47 = 53.2% vs. 21/34 = 61.8%
Pittsburgh 9/41 = 22.0% vs. 13/32 = 40.6%
Georgetown 11/35 = 31.4% vs. 14/36 = 38.9%
North Carolina 11/37 = 29.7% vs. 11/37 = 29.7%
Pittsburgh II 6/22 = 27.3% vs. 18/24 = 75.0%
Miami 14/43 = 32.6% vs. 11/34 = 32.4%
Virginia Tech 11/42 = 26.2% vs. 1/22 = 4.5%
Virginia 6/35 = 17.1% vs. 9/46 = 19.6%
NC State 8/38 = 21.1% vs. 14/36 = 19.6%
Clemson 3/36 = 0.83% vs. 3/44 = 0.68%
NC State II 12/33 = 36.4% vs. 9/29 = 31.0%
Bost College II 15/46 = 32.6% vs. 11/35 = 31.4%
Notre Dame 12/38 = 31.6% vs. 16/29 = 55.2%
Duke 13/34 = 38.2% vs. 14/39 = 35.9%
Georgia Tech 17/33 = 51.5% vs. 19/36 = 52.8%)
No Carolina II 20/37 = 54.1% vs. 9/33 = 27.3%
Clemson II 19/34 = 29.4% vs. 11/32 = 34.4%
NC State III 8/34 = 23.5% vs. 10/22 = 45.5%
Virginia II 15/28 = 53.6% vs. 2/35 = 5.7%
San Diego State 3/37 = 8.1% vs. 5/25 = 20.0%
West Virginia 14/37 = 37.8% vs. 15/31 = 48.4%
Houston 0/33 = 0.0% vs. 8/41 = 19.5%
TOTALS: 391/1032 = 37.9% 325/930 = 34.9%
We were 11-0 when we did a better job of taking advantage of fast brake opportunities, lost the one time it was even and were 7-10 when the opposition took better advantage. Conversely we took better advantage just once in our last 10 games but won 6 of those games and played our best ball of the year during that time.
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
FCP
Bryant 30-44
Niagara 21-31
Rider 47-23
Rutgers 31-35
Boston College 60-36
Northeastern 2-32
Buffalo 34-55
Pittsburgh 44-19
Georgetown 38-41
North Carolina 51-28
Pittsburgh II 38-34
Miami 50-31
Virginia Tech 33-34
Virginia 38-56
NC State 50-33
Clemson 27-43
NC State II 38-15
Bost College II 34-32
Notre Dame 24-42
Duke 27-37
Georgia Tech 32-41
No Carolina II 32-22
Clemson II 28-33
NC State III 66-25
Virginia II 24-50
San Diego State 60-44
West Virginia 50-34
Houston 46-62
TOTALS: 1055-1012
We were 10-3 when we outscored the opposition against set defenses, 7-7 when we didn’t. Interesting that scoring off fast breaks was a more important stat.
SCP
Bryant 11-9
Niagara 14-2
Rider 2-5
Rutgers 10-9
Boston College 9-7
Northeastern 12-5
Buffalo 16-11
Pittsburgh 3-21
Georgetown 11-7
North Carolina 4-24
Pittsburgh II 13-18
Miami 10-6
Virginia Tech 16-13
Virginia 5-7
NC State 8-13
Clemson 11-18
NC State II 15-8
Bost College II 8-12
Notre Dame 16-5
Duke 24-16
Georgia Tech 14-11
No Carolina II 10-25
Clemson II 5-6
NC State III 8-14
Virginia II 17-9
San Diego State 4-10
West Virginia 4-14
Houston 5-3
TOTALS 285-308
We were 11-4 when we won this stat, 7-6 when we lost it. But we won it only twice in the last 7 games – and lost the two games in that stretch where we won the stat.
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Starter Scoring
Bryant 66-58
Niagara 64-24
Rider 66-42
Rutgers 61-68
Boston College 80-23
Northeastern 55-33
Buffalo 94-54
Pittsburgh 43-45
Georgetown 71-55
North Carolina 69-52
Pittsburgh II 74-89
Miami 69-42
Virginia Tech 65-41
Virginia 53-72
NC State 62-59
Clemson 57-44
NC State II 64-49
Bost College II 68-50
Notre Dame 66-59
Duke 52-75
Georgia Tech 63-81
No Carolina II 60-47
Clemson II 54-26
NC State III 72-17
Virginia II 57-62
San Diego State 56-50
West Virginia 64-59
Houston 36-50
TOTAL 1761-1426
We were 18-2 when our starters out-scored theirs, 0-8 when we didn’t. obviously the product of a shorter rotation: our starters have to outscore theirs because they are on the court more or we’ve got no chance.
Bench Scoring
Bryant 19-26
Niagara 11-21
Rider 21-10
Rutgers 8-11
Boston College 21-40
Northeastern 7-23
Buffalo 13-42
Pittsburgh 17-18
Georgetown 3-14
North Carolina 6-29
Pittsburgh II 2-7
Miami 14-15
Virginia Tech 13-19
Virginia 5-9
NC State 14-14
Clemson 4-34
NC State II 28-20
Bost College II 7-17
Notre Dame 9-8
Duke 19-10
Georgia Tech 14-3
No Carolina II 12-23
Clemson II 10-28
NC State III 17-15
Virginia II 12-10
San Diego State 22-12
West Virginia 11-13
Houston 10-12
TOTALS: 334-558
We were 5-3 when our bench outscored theirs, won the one even game and were 12-7 when we didn’t. How our starters did had a lot more to do with winning than how our reserves did.
