Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
Net Points, etc. - Georgia Tech II
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="SWC75, post: 4587060, member: 289"] I will again be doing a report after each game this season and a summary report at the end of each month. (I’ve eliminated some stats from previous years to streamline this post.) This is limited to recruited scholarship players only. Net Points (points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls) Average net points/40 by position, (based on averaging 20+ minutes per game), since the 1980-81 season: Centers 18.6; Power Forwards: 18.4; Small Forwards: 16.1, Shooting Guards: 13.3; Point Guards: 13.5 Jesse Edwards +26NP in 34 minutes = +593NP in 966 minutes = +24.6NP/40 for season Judah Mintz +20NP in 38 minutes = +369NP in 996 minutes = +14.8NP/40 for season Benny Williams +19NP in 30 minutes = +190NP in 624 minutes = +12.0NP/40 for season Maliq Brown +3NP in 19 minutes = +245NP in 548 minutes = +17.9NP/40 for season Joe Girard +2NP in 33 minutes = +340NP in 1,029 minutes = +13.2NP/40 for season Justin Taylor +1NP in 18 minutes = +113NP in 485 minutes = +9.3NP/40 for season Symir Torrence 0NP in 18 minutes = +103NP in 322 minutes = +12.8NP/40 for season Quadir Copeland -3NP in 6 minutes = +19NP in 158 minutes = +4.8NP/40 for season DNP coach’s decision John Bol Ajak 0NP in 0 minutes = +34NP in 122 minutes = +11.1NP/40 for season Mounir Hima 0NP in 0 minutes = +51NP in 195 minutes = +10.5NP/40 for season Coach’s Dog House Chris Bell 0NP in 0 minutes = +95NP in 548 minutes = +6.9NP/40 for season Injured or ill and couldn’t play None Suspended None Redshirting Peter Carey 0NP in 0 minutes = -2NP in 20 minutes = -4.0NP/40 for season Out for the year None Left Team Awards Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog) (Points plus assists) Judah Mintz 23 points and 7 assists = 30 Shooting Efficiency (Points minus missed field goal and free throw attempts) Jesse Edwards 18 points – 4mfg – 0mft = +14 Scoring Efficiency (Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points) Benny Williams 11 points of 15 = 73.3% My Man (Who played the most minutes?) Judah Mintz 38 minutes TEAM STATS Possession Rebounding (Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that) We rebounded 5 of our 29 misses = 17.2% They rebounded 10 of their 33 misses = 30.3% Unsettled Situations [Second Chance Points+ Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers) We had 19 points in 14 unsettled situations = 1.357 points/situation They had 27 points in 20 unsettled situations = 1.350 points/situation Manufactured Possessions (One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers) We had 28 + 9 = 37 They had 34 + 10 = 44 Scoring Shooting (Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws) We were 23 for 39 on twos, (59.0%), 4 for 17 on threes (23.5%) and 18 for 20 on frees (90.0%) They were 17 for 27 on twos, (63.0%), 18 for 40 on threes (45.0%) and 8 for 10 on frees (80.0%) Points (PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum” POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots) TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, (two point jumpers from outside the paint) FT = Free Throws We had 42 PIP, 16 POP, 12 OL, 4 TZ, 18 FT They had 28 PIP, 60 POP, 54 OL, 6 TZ, 8 FT Fast Break Percentage (FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals) We scored 17 FBP in 31 opportunities (54.8%) They scored 17 FBP in 33 opportunities (57.5%) First Chance/Second Chance (FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.) We had 37 FCP and 4 SCP They had 56 FCP and 15 SCP Starters/Bench (Total points – bench points = starters points) Our starters scored 65 points and our bench scored 11 points. Their starters scored 96 points and their bench scored 0 points. Efficiency Assists (The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted) We assisted 17 of our 27 field goals = 63.0% They assisted 27 of their 35 field goals = 77.1% Team Offensive Possession Efficiency (Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions) We scored 76 points in 71 possessions = 1.070 points/ possession They scored 96 points in 71 possessions = 1.352 points/possession It was a 142-possession game. If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession: We scored 76 points in 66 possessions = 1.152 points/ possession They scored 96 points in 72 possessions = 1.333 points/possession Team Shooting Efficiency (Points minus missed field goals and free throws) We scored 76 points, missed 29 field goals and missed 2 free throws = net +45 They scored 96 points, missed 22 field goals and missed 2 free throws = net +62 (Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot) We scored 76 on 39 two-point attempts, 40 three-point attempts and 10 free throw attempts = 76 of a possible 149 points = 51.1% of possible points scored. They scored 96 on 27 two-point attempts, 17 three-point attempts and 20 free throw attempts = 96 of a possible 184 points = 52.2% of possible points scored. Fouls (Most fouls are called on two point shot attempts.) We attempted 39 two-point shots and were fouled 14 times = 2.79 They attempted 27 two-point shots and were fouled 11 times = 2.45 Comments: - Every point for Tech was scored by their starters, who played 37-39 minutes each. JB must have envied Josh Pastner to have five guys he trusts to win the game for him. - Benny Williams has had consecutive 20 and 19NP games. Will he be the star of next eyar’s team? - Quadir Copeland is very athletic and has some skills but statistically he’s having a terrible, mostly because he can’t shoot. - Judah Mintz had a great game with 30NP, (most since Joe Girard had 35 in the first Georgia Tech game). Imagine how well he would have done if his jump shot (1 for 6 from three) hadn’t turned into a pumpkin. - Basically, they couldn’t stop our top 3 guys but we couldn’t stop their top 4 guys. - We out-shot Duke, Clemson and Pittsburgh from three 44%-43% but they got off 143 attempts to our 67. Tech, which came in shooting 33%, shot 45% while we shot 23.5%. If we’d shot 44%, we would have had 7-8 three instead of 4.That would at least have made the final margin a little easier to swallow, even if the result wasn’t. - The volume of three pointers we have to defend pulls apart our defense inside the arc. Duke shot 59% on two pointers, 69%, 59% and 62%. Bill Russell couldn’t cover both posts and both corners unless there was two of him. - JB pointed out that a lot of those threes produce rebounds that go to the high post. Our failure to keep them out of the high post thus produces a lot of offensive rebounds for the other teams. The four teams we’ve lost to in this streak. That’s why the offensive rebounds have been 33-50. - Tech had 60 ‘POP’, (points outside the paint), the second most of the season: #1 was Colgate 61. - Both teams had 17 fast break points, a high total these days. The fact that we pressed for much of the game was factor in this. It speeds up the game, for better or worse. - At least we were more competitive in the assists battle: Duke 7/19 = 36.8% vs. 22/30 = 73.3% Clemson 9/27 = 33.3% vs. 28/34 = 82.4% Pittsburgh 13/28 = 46.4% vs. 27/32 = 84.4% Georgia Tech 17/27 = 63.0% vs. 27/35 = 77.1% The season averages have been 52.6 – 72.6% [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
Net Points, etc. - Georgia Tech II
Top
Bottom