Net Points, etc. - Georgia Tech | Syracusefan.com

Net Points, etc. - Georgia Tech

SWC75

Bored Historian
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,729
Like
64,936
I will again be doing a report after each game this season and a summary report at the end of the non-conference season, the ACC season and the post season.

Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)

Elijah Hughes +35NP in 34 minutes = +165/327 = +20.2NP/40 for season
Marek Dolezaj +21NP in 30 minutes = +98/314 = +12.5NP/40 for season
Buddy Boeheim +18NP in 33 minutes = +77/290 = +10.6NP/40 for season
Bourama Sidibie +11NP in 28 minutes = +70/211 = +13.3NP/40 for season
Joe Girard +10NP in 22 minutes = +90/247 = +14.6NP/40 for season
Jesse Edwards +9NP in 7 minutes = +33/55 = +24.0NP/40 for season
Howard Washington +9NP in 17 minutes = +22/46 = +19.1NP/40 for season
Brycen Goodine +3NP in 4 minutes = 0/66 = 0.0NP/40 for season
Robert Braswell +1NP in 8 minutes = +2/33 = +2.4NP/40 for season
Quincy Guerrier -8NP in 12 minutes = +40/167 = +9.6NP/40 for season

DNP coach’s decision

Injured
Jalen Carey 0NP in 0 minutes = -3/23 = -5.2NP/40 for season

Suspended
None

Redshirting
John Bol Ajak

Out for the year
None

Left Team
None


Awards

Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Elijah Hughes 33 points + 4 assist = 37

Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goal and free throw attempts)
Elijah Hughes 33 points – 5 mfg – 0 mft = +28

Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Elijah Hughes 33 points of 48 = 68.8%

Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half?)
1st Half- Elijah Hughes trey at 18:35 2nd Half- Buddy Boeheim trey at 18.22

TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub)
Joe Girard trey at 11:06

My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Elijah Hughes 34 minutes


TEAM STATS

Possession

Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 10 of our 27 misses = 37.0%
They rebounded 13 of their 43 misses = 30.2%

Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 13 points on 10 O-Rebs = 1.300 points/O-reb
They got 12 points on 13 O-Rebs = 0.923 points/O-reb

Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 17 turnovers – 8 steals = 9 unforced
They had 19 turnovers – 14 steals = 5 unforced

Points per Takeover
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 20 points from 19 takeovers = 1.053 points/takeaway
They had 21 points from 17 takeovers = 1.235 points/takeaway

Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeover: [Second Chance Point s+ Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 33 points in 29 unsettled situations = 1.138 points
They had 33 points in 30 unsettled situations = 1.100 points

Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 40 + 19 = 59
They had 30 + 17 = 47

Hustle Stats
One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + steals + blocks. I decided to keep track of that, too:
We had 40 + 14 + 6 = 60
They had 30 + 8 + 2 = 40

Scoring

Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 15 for 24 on twos, (62.5%), 14 for 33 on threes (42.4%) and 25 for 30 on frees (83.3%)
They were 16 for 40 on twos, (40.0%), 8 for 23 on threes (34.8%) and 7 for 18 on frees (38.9%)
Combined percentages were: 1882 (625 + 424 + 833) vs. 1137 (400 + 348 + 389) = +745

Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, (two point jumpers from outside the paint)
FBP = fast break points
POTO= points off turnovers

We had 24 PIP, 48 POP, 42 OL, 6 TZ, 20 POTO, 21 FBP
They had 26 PIP, 30 POP, 24 OL, 6 TZ, 21 POTO, 10 FBP

Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 21 FBP in 50 opportunities (42.0%)
They scored 10 FBP in 27 opportunities (37.0%)

First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 38 FCP and 13 SCP
They had 34 FCP and 12 SCP

Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 85 points and our bench scored 12 points
Their starters scored 51 points and their bench scored 12 points

Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 23 of our 29 field goals = 79.3%
They assisted 19 of their 24 field goals = 79.1%

Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 97 points in 78 possessions = 1.244 points/ possession
They scored 63 points in 78 possessions = 0.808 points/possession
It was a 156 possession game.

If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession:
We scored 97 points in 71 possessions = 1.366 points/ possession
They scored 63 points in 72 possessions = 0.875 points/possession

Team Shooting Efficiency

(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)

We scored 97 points, missed 28 field goals and missed 5 free throws = net +64
They scored 63 points, missed 39 field goals and missed 11 free throws = net +13

(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)

We scored 97 on 24 two point attempts, 33 three point attempts and 30 free throw attempts = 97 of a possible 177 points = 54.8% of possible points scored.
They scored 63 on 40 two point attempts, 23 three point attempts and 18 free throw attempts = 63 of possible 167 points = 37.7% of possible points scored.

Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)

29-12, 19-16, 25-17, 24-18

Fouls

(Two point shots and free throws attempted per times fouled.)
We attempted 24 two point shots, attempted 30 free throws and were fouled 20 times = 1.20; 1.50
They attempted 40 two point shots, attempted 18 free throws and were fouled 19 times = 2.11; 0.95
We were more likely to get calls when attempting two point shots and got more shots per foul.

Comments

- It wasn’t complicated: We had 59 manufactured possessions (rebounds + takeovers) to Tech’s 47 and out-shot them in combined percentages (FG% + 3PT% + FT%) by +745 points.

- We had 18 POP, (total points – points in the paint – free throws) vs. Iowa and 48 in this game.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
169,814
Messages
4,854,641
Members
5,981
Latest member
SyraFreed

Online statistics

Members online
245
Guests online
1,438
Total visitors
1,683


...
Top Bottom