Net Points, Etc- GT | Syracusefan.com

Net Points, Etc- GT

SWC75

Bored Historian
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,621
Like
64,712
Net Points

(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls) Season net points and average per 40 minutes is in parenthesis.

Tyus Battle 15NP in 39 minutes (252/11.9)
Marek Dolezaj 13NP in 38 minutes (150/11.7)
Oshae Brissett 10NP in 40 minutes (288/13.7)
Bourama Sidibe 2NP in 19 minutes (64/10.7)
Matthew Moyer 1NP in 2 minutes (119/11.1)
Paschal Chukwu 1NP in 22 minutes (225/14.9)
Frank Howard -4NP in 40 minutes (228/11.0)

DNP coach’s decision
None

Injured or suspended
Howard Washington (24/8.6)

Left team
Geno Thorpe (14/6.5)


Awards


Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)

Tyus Battle 19p + 4a = 23

Scoring Efficiency
(Points minus field goal and free throw attempts)

Tyus Battle 19p – 13mfg – 0mft = 6

Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half)

1st Half- Oshae Brissett trey 16:29 in
2nd Half- Tyus Battle Jumper 19:00 in

TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub)

No tacos for us!

My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)

Oshae Brissett and frank Howard 40 minutes


Team Stats:
(I’ve decided to put the team that won the stat in bold and ties in italics.)

POSSESSION

Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)

We rebounded 10 of our 35 misses = 28.6%
They rebounded 13 of their 43 misses = 30.2%

Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)

We got 8 points on 10 O-Rebs = 0.800 points/O-reb
They got 11 points on 13 O-Rebs = 0.846 points/ O-reb

Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)

We had 15 turnovers – 9 steals = 6 unforced
They had 9 turnovers – 3 steals = 6 unforced


Points per Takeaway
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)

We had 4 points from 9 takeaways = 0.444 points/takeaway
They had 14 points from 15 takeaways = 0.933 points/takeaway

Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeaway: [Second Chance Point + Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)

We had 12 points in 19 unsettled situations = 0.632 points
They had 25 points in 28 unsettled situations = 0.893 points

Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)

We had 40 + 9 = 49
They had 38 + 15= 53


Scoring

Shooting
(shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)

We were 10 for 32 on twos, (31.25%), 5 for 18 on threes (27.8%) and 16 for 20 on frees (80.0%)
They were 16 for 45 on twos, (35.6%), 5 for 18 on threes (27.8%) and 8 for 12 on frees (66.7%)

Points
(PIP= points in the paint, POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP –free throws made, TREY: points from three point shots, TZ= Twilight Zone, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points POTO= points off turnovers)

We had 10 PIP, 25 POP, 15 TREY, 10 TZ, 4 POTO, 6 FBP
They had 30 PIP, 17 POP, 15 TREY, 2 TZ, 14 POTO, 16 FBP

Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)

We scored 6 FBP in 38 opportunities (15.8%)
They scored 16 FBP in 41 opportunities (39.0%)

First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)

We had 21 FCP and 8 SCP
They had 20 FCP and 11 SCP

Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)

Our starters scored 48 points and our bench scored 3 points
Their starters scored 40 points and their bench scored 15 points

Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)

We assisted 9 of our 15 field goals = 60.0%
They assisted 17 of their 21 field goals = 80.9%

Team Offensive Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)

We scored 51 points in 65 possessions = 0.785 points/ possession
They scored 55 points in 65 possessions = 0.846 points/possession
It was a 130 possession game. (We are averaging 133 a game in regulation.)

Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)

5-14, 16-10, 8-12, 22-19

Fouls
(Two point shots, points in paint and free throws attempted per times fouled.)

We attempted 32 two point shots, scored 10 points in the paint, attempted 20 free throws and were fouled 15 times = 2.13; 0.67; 1.33
They attempted 45 two point shots, scored 30 points in the paint, attempted 12 free throws and were fouled 15 times = 3.00; 2.00; 0.80

We were more likely to get calls when attempting two point shots or scoring in the paint and we got more free throws out of it when fouled.


Comments:

- We made 69% of our two point shots vs. Boston College Tonight it was 31.25%. That defines both ‘pretty’ and ‘ugly’ in the sport of basketball.

- We had 10 fewer points off turnovers, 3 fewer second chance points, 12 fewer bench points, 20 fewer points in the paint and 10 fewer fast break points. How was this game even close?

- It was my impression, (fed to me by the announcers) that we were the victim of many no-calls on shot attempts or turnovers. But we were more likely to draw foul calls than Tech and got to the line more. Just not enough to make up for our other deficits.

We actually had more first chance points: 21-20. It doesn’t mean we played well. It means both teams stunk.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
169,650
Messages
4,843,322
Members
5,981
Latest member
SYRtoBOS

Online statistics

Members online
141
Guests online
1,184
Total visitors
1,325


...
Top Bottom