Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SWC75, post: 3626986, member: 289"] I will again be doing a report after each game this season and a summary report at the end of each month. (I’ve eliminated some stats from previous years to streamline this post.) Net Points (points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls) (season totals double-checked from Cuse.com stats on 3/1) Quincy Guerrier +35NP in 26 minutes = +53NP in 59 minutes = +35.9NP/40 for season Kadary Richmond +29NP in 35 minutes = +35NP in 44 minutes = +31.8NP/40 for season Marek Dolezaj +16NP in 31 minutes = +43NP in 68 minutes = +25.3NP/40 for season Woody Newton +10NP in 14 minutes = +10NP in 14 minutes = +28.6NP/40 for season Alan Griffin +6NP in 30 minutes = +24NP in 68 minutes = +14.1NP/40 for season Jesse Edwards +1NP in 1 minute = +1NP in 2 minutes = +20.0NP/40 for season Joe Girard +1NP in 35 minutes = +2NP in 69 minutes = +1.2NP/40 for season Frank Anselem 0NP in 4 minutes = -1NP in 8 minutes = -5.0NP/40 for season John Bol Ajak -2NP in 9 minutes = -2NP in 9 minutes = -8.9NP/40 for season Robert Braswell -6NP in 15 minutes = -9NP in 18 minutes = -20.0NP/40 for season DNP coach’s decision Chaz Owens Injured and couldn’t play Bourama Sidibie (+1NP in 4 minutes = +10.0NP/40 for season) Suspended Buddy Boeheim (+17NP in 37 minutes = +18.4NP/40 for season) Redshirting None (that we know of) Out for the year None Left Team None Awards Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog) (Points plus assists) Quincy Guerrier 23 points and 0 assists = 23 Shooting Efficiency (Points minus missed field goal and free throw attempts) Quincy Guerrier 23 points – 1mfg – 1mft = +21 Scoring Efficiency (Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points) Quincy Guerrier 23 points of 26 = 88.5% My Man (Who played the most minutes?) Joe Girard and Kadary Richmond 35 minutes TEAM STATS Possession Rebounding (Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that) We rebounded 13 of our 34 misses = 38.2% They rebounded 11 of their 49 misses = 22.4% Effective Offensive Rebounding (Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds) We got 14 points on 13 O-Rebs = 1.077 points/O-Reb They got 2 points on 11 O-Rebs = 0.182 points/O-Reb Unforced Turnovers (Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers) We had 17 turnovers – 7 steals = 10 unforced They had 17 turnovers – 11 steals = 6 unforced Points per Takeover (Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had) We had 22 points from 17 takeovers = 1.294 points/takeaway They had 8 points from 17 takeovers = 0.471 points/takeaway Unsettled Situations (Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeover: [Second Chance Points+ Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers) We had 36 points in 36 unsettled situations = 1.000 points They had 10 points in 28 unsettled situations = 0.375 points Manufactured Possessions (One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers) We had 51 + 17 = 68 They had 32 + 17 = 49 Hustle Stats One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + steals + blocks. I decided to keep track of that, too: We had 51 + 7 + 11 = 68 They had 32 + 2 + 7= 41 Scoring Shooting (Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws) We were 22 for 37 on twos, (59.5%), 5 for 23 on threes (21.7%) and 16 for 21 on frees (76.2%) They were 12 for 29 on twos, (41.4%), 6 for 36 on threes (16.7%) and 3 for 6 on frees (50.0%) Combined percentages were: 595 + 217+ 762 = 1,574 vs. 414 + 167 + 500 = 1,081 = +493 Points (PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum” POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots) TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, (two point jumpers from outside the paint) FBP = fast break points POTO= points off turnovers We had 40 PIP, 19 POP, 18 OL, 2 TZ, 22 POTO, 24 FBP They had 9 PIP, 20 POP, 15 OL, 4 TZ, 8 POTO, 9 FBP Fast Break Percentage (FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals) We scored 24 FBP in 31 opportunities (77.4%) They scored 9 FBP in 20 opportunities (45.0%) First Chance/Second Chance (FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.) We had 21 FCP and 14 SCP They had 31 FCP and 2 SCP Starters/Bench (Total points – bench points = starters points) Our starters scored 64 points and our bench scored 11 points Their starters scored 24 points and their bench scored 21 points Assists (The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted) We assisted 15 of our 27 field goals = 55.6% They assisted 14 of their 18 field goals = 77.8% Team Offensive Possession Efficiency (Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions) We scored 75 points in 74 possessions = 1.019 points/ possession They scored 45 points in 74 possessions = 0.608 points/possession It was a 148 possession game. If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession: We scored 75 points in 70 possessions = 1.071 points/ possession They scored 45 points in 68 possessions = 0.662 points/possession Team Shooting Efficiency (Points minus missed field goals and free throws) We scored 75 points, missed 33 field goals and missed 5 free throws = net +37 They scored 45 points, missed 37 field goals and missed 3 free throws = net +5 (Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot) We scored 75 on 37 two point attempts, 23 three point attempts and 21 free throw attempts = 85 of a possible 164 points = 45.7% of possible points scored. They scored 45 on 29 two point attempts, 36 three point attempts and 6 free throw attempts = 84 of a possible 172 points = 26.2% of possible points scored. Fouls (Most fouls are called on two point shot attempts.) We attempted 37 two point shots and were fouled 16 times = 2.31 They attempted 29 two point shots and were fouled 10 times = 2.90 Comments - Team stat of the game: SU had a combined 36 second chance points and points off turnovers to 10 for Niagara. We had guys who, due to individual moves, court vison and passing ability could take full advent age of unsettled situations. Niagara had nobody like that. - Niagara actually had more First Chance Points, 21-31, indicating that our ability to take advantage of unsettled situations was really important. - We didn’t win by 30 by shooting the lights out. We had 19 POP to 20. But isn’t shooting supposed to be our strong point? What could we do when we find the range? - We also lost the ‘Bench Points’ stat 11-21. It didn’t matter because we won ‘Starter’s Points’ by 64-24. [/QUOTE]

Verification: What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?