Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
Net Points, etc.- Oakland
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="SWC75, post: 2389178, member: 289"] I’ve added so many things to my post-game “Net Points” posts over the years that it’s become a very long post to read and a longer one to do. I’ve decided to have separate posts for the numbers for a particular game and for the cumulative season totals. It’s the later that takes most of the time and lengthens the post so much. There was too much verbiage and too many numbers. I’m still going to figure the season totals but I’ll post them at three different stages of the season: after the pre-conference schedule, after the conference schedule and after the post season. In the meantime, I’ll go with this stream-lined version of “Net Points, etc.” after each game, with numbers and commentary only for that game. That should make it both quicker to do and more digestible. [B]Net Points[/B] (points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls) Paschal Chukwu 26NP in 31 minutes Frank Howard 14NP in 30 minutes Tyus Battle 14NP in 38 minutes Oshae Brissett 11NP in 36 minutes Marek Dolezaj 7NP in 25 minutes Howard Washington 4NP in 4 minutes Bourama Sidibe 4NP in 7 minutes Geno Thorpe 3NP in 13 minutes Matthew Moyer 1NP in 12 minutes DNP coach’s decision None Injured or suspended None [B]Awards[/B] [I]Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)[/I] (Points plus assists) Tyus Battle 25 + 0 = 25 [I]Scoring Efficiency[/I] (Points minus field goal and free throw attempts) Tyus Battle 25 points – 8 mfg – 1 mft = 16 [I]Sat Us Down[/I] (Who scored the first SU basket of each half) 1st Half- Tyus Battle jumper 31 seconds in 2nd Half- Paschal Chukwu dunk 3:55 seconds in [I]TACO Bell MVP[/I] (Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub) Frank Howard with a lay-up at 4:58 left My Man (Who played the most minutes?) Tyus Battle 38 minutes [B]Team Stats:[/B] [I](I’ve decide to put the team that won the stat in bold and ties in italics.)[/I] POSSESSION [I]Rebounding[/I] (Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that) [B]We rebounded 14 of our 38 misses = 36.8%[/B] They rebounded 9 of their 43 misses = 20.9% [I]Effective Offensive Rebounding[/I] (Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds) [B]We got 16 points on 14 O-Rebs = 1.143 points/O-reb[/B] They got 8 points on 9 O-Rebs = 0.889 points/ O-reb [I]Unforced Turnovers[/I] (Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers) We had 15 turnovers – 5 steals = 10 unforced [B]They had 19 turnovers – 12 steals = 7 unforced[/B] [I]Points per Takeaway[/I] (Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had) [B]We had 23 points from 19 takeaways =1.211 points/takeaway[/B] They had 13 points from 15 takeaways = 0.867 points/takeaway [I]Unsettled Situations[/I] (Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeaway: [Second Chance Point + Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers) [B]We had 39 points in 33 unsettled situations = 1.182 points[/B] They had 21 points in 24 unsettled situations = 0.875 points [I]Manufactured Possessions[/I] (One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers) [B]We had 48 + 19 = 67 [/B] They had 33 + 15 = 48 [B]Scoring[/B] [I]Shooting[/I] (shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws) We were [B]28 for 56 on twos, (50.0%),[/B] [B]3 for 8 on threes (37.5%)[/B] and 9 for 18 on frees (50.0%) They were 12 for 37 on twos, (32.4%), 6 for 22 on threes (27.3[B]%)[/B] and [B]8 for 11 on frees (72.7%)[/B] [I]Points[/I] (PIP= points in the paint, POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP –free throws made, TREY: points from three point shots, TZ= Twilight Zone, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points POTO= points off turnovers) We had [B]40 PIP[/B], [B]25 POP[/B], 9 TREY, [B]16 TZ[/B], [B]8 FBP[/B], [B]23 POTO[/B] They had 20 PIP, 22 POP, [B]18 TREY[/B], 4 TZ, 4 FBP, 13 POTO [I]First Chance/Second Chance[/I] (FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.) We had [B]41 FCP[/B] and [B]16 SCP[/B] They had 30 FCP and 8 SCP [I]Starters/Bench[/I] (Total points – bench points = starters points) Our [B]starters scored 68 points[/B] and our bench scored 6 points Their starters scored 38 points and their [B]bench scored 12 points[/B] [I]Assists[/I] (The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted) We assisted 13 of our 31 field goals = 41.9% [B]They assisted 12 of their 18 field goals = 66.7%[/B] [I]Team Offensive Efficiency[/I] (Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions) [B]We scored 74 points in 74 possessions = 1.000 points/possession[/B] They scored 50 points in 74 possessions = 0.676 points/ possession It was a 148 possession game. [I]Breakdown by Quarters[/I] (Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one) 20-14. 19-11, 12-13, 23-12 [B]Fouls[/B] (Two point shots, points in paint and free throws attempted per times fouled.) We attempted 56 two point shots, scored 40 points in the paint, attempted 18 free throws and were fouled 18 times = 3.11; 2.22; 1.00 They attempted 37 two point shots, scored 20 points in the paint, attempted 11 free throws and were fouled 17 times = 2.18; 1.18; 0.65 Oakland was more likely to draw a foul and to get to the line but Syracuse got more free throws per foul. [B]Comments: [/B] - Who would ever have expected Paschal Chukwu to lead this team in net points 26, 12 more than anyone else? It was also important that he had the stamina to play 31 minutes and that he committed only two fouls. The latter is an indication that he understands his role and how to do things out there. Knowledge is power. - We are now 38-6 in Twilight Zone points this year. We are 72-39 in points off turnovers and 140-88 in points in the paint. Those are tremendous differences. - We also had 39 points in unsettled situations to 21, another big difference. I think Dolezaj is a big part of that. - A 67 to 48 edge in manufactured possessions is huge. - JB really wants this team to go inside. 56 of our 64 field goal attempts were two pointers (87.5%). - We won big but only scored a point per possession. We won this game on defense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
Net Points, etc.- Oakland
Top
Bottom