Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SWC75, post: 3202287, member: 289"] I will again be doing a report after each game this season and a summary report at the end of the non-conference season, the ACC season and the post season. Net Points (points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls) Elijah Hughes +17NP in 40 minutes = +123/253 = +19.4NP/40 for season Quincy Guerrier +12NP in 31 minutes = +44/133 = +13.2NP/40 for season Marek Dolezaj +7NP in 31 minutes = +67/224 = +12.0NP/40 for season Joe Girard +5NP in 32 minutes = +72/196 = +14.7NP/40 for season Robert Braswell -1NP in 1 minutes = +1/25 = +1.6NP/40 for season Buddy Boeheim -1NP in 39 minutes = +60/227 = +10.6NP/40 for season Bourama Sidibie -3NP in 17 minutes = +54/156 = +13.8NP/40 for season Brycen Goodine -5NP in 9 minutes = +1/58 = +0.7NP/40 for season DNP coach’s decision Jesse Edwards 0NP in 0 minutes = +22/45 = +19.6NP/40 for season Howard Washington 0NP in 0 minutes = +8/23 = +13.9NP/40 for season Injured Jalen Carey 0NP in 0 minutes = -3/23 = -5.2NP/40 for season Suspended None Redshirting John Bol Ajak Out for the year None Left Team None Awards Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog) (Points plus assists) Elijah Hughes 19 points + 4 assist = 23 Shooting Efficiency (Points minus missed field goal and free throw attempts) Elijah Hughes 19 points – 8 mfg – 2 mft = +9 Scoring Efficiency (Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points) Marek Dolezaj 10 points of 16 = 62.5% Sat Us Down (Who scored the first SU basket of each half?) 1st Half- Buddy Boeheim jumper at 15:53 2nd Half- Quincy Guerrier lay-up at 18.53 TACO Bell MVP (Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub) No Tacos for us! My Man (Who played the most minutes?) Elijah Hughes 40 minutes TEAM STATS Possession Rebounding (Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that) We rebounded 7 of our 41 misses = 17.1% They rebounded 23 of their 44 misses = 52.3% Effective Offensive Rebounding (Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds) We got 7 points on 7 O-Rebs = 1.000 points/O-reb They got 17 points on 23 O-Rebs = 0.739 points/O-reb Unforced Turnovers (Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers) We had 12 turnovers – 6 steals = 6 unforced They had 14 turnovers – 8 steals = 6 unforced Points per Takeover (Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had) We had 16 points from 14 takeovers = 1.143 points/takeaway They had 11 points from 12 takeovers = 0.917 points/takeaway Unsettled Situations (Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeover: [Second Chance Point s+ Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers) We had 23 points in 21 unsettled situations = 1.095 points They had 28 points in 35 unsettled situations = 0.800 points Manufactured Possessions (One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers) We had 28 + 14 = 42 They had 57 + 12 = 69 Hustle Stats One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + steals + blocks. I decided to keep track of that, too: We had 28 + 2 + 8 = 38 They had 57 + 4 + 6 = 67 Scoring Shooting (Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws) We were 12 for 32 on twos, (37.5%), 6 for 22 on threes (27.3%) and 22 for 33 on frees (66.7%) They were 17 for 37 on twos, (45.9%), 10 for 30 on threes (33.3%) and 21 for 31 on frees (67.7%) Combined percentages were: 1315 (375 + 273 + 667) vs. 1469 (459 + 333 + 677) = -154 Points (PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum” POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots) TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, (two point jumpers from outside the paint) FBP = fast break points POTO= points off turnovers We had 20 PIP, 22 POP, 18 OL, 4 TZ, 16 POTO, 12 FBP They had 28 PIP, 34 POP, 30 OL, 4 TZ, 11 POTO, 19 FBP Fast Break Percentage (FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals) We scored 12 FBP in 31 opportunities (38.7%) They scored 19 FBP in 44 opportunities (43.2%) First Chance/Second Chance (FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.) We had 23 FCP and 7 SCP They had 26 FCP and 17 SCP Starters/Bench (Total points – bench points = starters points) Our starters scored 51 points and our bench scored 13 points Their starters scored 61 points and their bench scored 24 points Assists (The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted) We assisted 14 of our 18 field goals = 77.8% They assisted 18 of their 27 field goals = 66.7% Team Offensive Possession Efficiency (Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions) We scored 64 points in 75 possessions = 0.853 points/ possession They scored 85 points in 73 possessions = 1.164 points/possession It was a 148 possession game. If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession: We scored 64 points in 70 possessions = 0.914 points/ possession They scored 85 points in 82 possessions = 1.181points/possession Team Shooting Efficiency (Points minus missed field goals and free throws) We scored 64 points, missed 36 field goals and missed 11 free throws = net +17 They scored 85 points, missed 40 field goals and missed 11 free throws = net +34 (Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot) We scored 64 on 32 two point attempts, 22 three point attempts and 33 free throw attempts = 64 of a possible 163 points = 39.3% of possible points scored. They scored 85 on 37 two point attempts, 30 three point attempts and 31 free throw attempts = 85 of possible 195 points = 43.6% of possible points scored. Breakdown by Quarters (Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one) 7-17, 15-17, 26-20, 16-31 Fouls (Two point shots and free throws attempted per times fouled.) We attempted 32 two point shots, attempted 33 free throws and were fouled 21 times = 1.52; 1.57 They attempted 37 two point shots, attempted 34 free throws and were fouled 21 times = 1.76; 1.62 We were more likely to get calls when attempting two point shots but they got more shots per foul. The differences were minimal. Comments - There’s always some interesting stats. But this game was all about rebounding. We rebounded 17% of our misses and they actually were more likely to wind up with the ball when they missed?: 52%. Ball game. - We actually converted more times in unsettled situations, (offensive rebounds and ‘takeovers’), scoring 23 points in 21 such situations vs. 28 and 35 for State. The trouble is, they had 14 more unsettled situations than we did. - They also ran more, or at least better than we did, scoring 19 points in 44 opportunities to 12 in 31 for us. - By the way, I am now using the term “takeovers” rather than “takeaways” after hearing Andre Cisco use that phrase to describe yesterday’s football game in a post-game interview. ‘Turnovers’ vs. ‘Takeovers’. I like it. [/QUOTE]

Verification: What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?