Net Points, etc. - Pitt III | Syracusefan.com

Net Points, etc. - Pitt III

SWC75

Bored Historian
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
32,622
Like
62,900
I will again be doing a report after each game this season and a summary report at the end of the non-conference season, the ACC season and the post season.

Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)

Elijah Hughes 19NP in 40 minutes
Buddy Boeheim 17NP in 36 minutes
Paschal Chukwu 15NP in 30 minutes
Frank Howard 11NP in 37 minutes
Oshae Brissett 6NP in 24 minutes
Marek Dolezaj 3NP in 23 minutes
Jalen Carey 1NP in 7 minutes
Bourama Sidibe -2NP in 3 minutes

DNP coach’s decision
Robert Braswell

Injured
Tyus Battle

Out for the year
Howard Washington


Awards

Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Buddy Boeheim 20 points + 4 assists = 24

Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus field goal and free throw attempts)
Elijah Hughes 18 points – 6 mfg – 0 mft = +12

Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Elijah Hughes 18 of 34 possible points = 52.9%

Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half?)

1st Half- Frank Howard trey 1:38 in
2nd Half- Elijah Hughes trey 19 second in

TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub)
Buddy Boeheim with a free throw with 46 seconds left

My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Elijah Hughes 40 minutes


TEAM STATS

Possession

Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 13 of our 32 misses = 40.6%
They rebounded 15 of their 38 misses = 39.5%

Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 18 points on 13 O-Rebs = 1.385 points/O-reb
They got 11 points on 15 O-Rebs = 0.733 points/O-reb

Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 13 turnovers – 9 steals = 4 unforced
They had 14 turnovers – 11 steals = 3 unforced

Points per Takeaway
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 13 points from 14 takeaways = 0.929 points/takeaway
They had 13 points from 13 takeaways = 1.000 points/takeaway

Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeaway: [Second Chance Point + Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 31 points in 27 unsettled situations = 1.148 points
They had 24 points in 28 unsettled situations = 0.857 points

Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 36 + 14 = 50
They had 34 + 13 = 47

Hustle Stats
One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + steals + blocks. I decided to keep track of that, too:
We had 36 + 6 + 11 = 53
They had 34 + 2 + 9 = 45

Scoring

Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 11 for 26 on twos, (42.3%), 12 for 27 on threes (44.4%) and 15 for 21 on frees (71.4%)
They were 8 for 32 on twos, (25.0%), 10 for 23 on threes (43.5%) and 13 for 16 on frees (81.3%)
Combined percentages were: 1581 (423 + 444 + 714) vs. 1498 (250 + 435 + 813) = +83

Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points
POTO= points off turnovers

We had 18 PIP, 40 POP, 36 OL, 4 TZ, 13 POTO, 12 FBP
They had 14 PIP, 32 POP, 30 OL, 2 TZ, 13 POTO, 14 FBP

Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 12 FBP in 40 opportunities (30.0%)
They scored 14 FBP in 30 opportunities (46.7%)

First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 28 FCP and 18 SCP
They had 21 FCP and 11 SCP

Last Possessions
(Points scored on the last full possession of a half, a game or an overtime period.)
We scored 2 points
They scored 0 points

Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 67 points and our bench scored 6 points
Their starters scored 41 points and their bench scored 18 points

Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 16 of our 23 field goals = 69.6%
They assisted 9 of their 18 field goals = 50.0%

Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 73 points in 63 possessions = 1.159 points/ possession
They scored 59 points in 62 possessions = 0.952 points/possession
It was a 125 possession game.

If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession:
We scored 73 points in 63 possessions = 1.159 points/ possession
They scored 59 points in 63 possessions = 0.937 points/possession

Team Shooting Efficiency

(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)

We scored 73 points, missed 30 field goals and 6 missed free throws = net 37
They scored 59 points, missed 37 field goals and 3 missed free throws = net 19

(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)

We scored 73 on 26 two point attempts, 27 three point attempts and 21 free throw attempts = 73 of a possible 154 points = 47.4% of possible points scored.
They scored 59 on 32 two point attempts, 23 three point attempts and 16 free throw attempts = 59 of a possible 149 points = 39.6% of possible points scored.

Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)

13-19, 17-17, 24-10, 19-13

Fouls

(Two point shots and free throws attempted per times fouled.)
We attempted 29 two point shots, attempted 21 free throws and were fouled 24 times = 1.21; 0.875
They attempted 32 two point shots, attempted 16 free throws and were fouled 16 times = 2.00; 1.00
We were equally likely to get calls when attempting two point shots but they got more free throws per foul.

Comments

- Neither Virginia or Clemson had any fast break points but beat us anyway. We also had none vs. the Tigers. It was refreshing to see a game with 26 fast break points in it. Basketball like it oughta be.

- With Buddy Boeheim starting, we lost the battle of the bench points 6-18 and all was right with the world again.

- We won the assists battle for the first time in 13 games (Miami). With Tyus out we started looking for the open man rather than setting up isolation plays.

- Funny how the fouls turned around when we played Pittsburgh instead of an original ACC team.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
167,779
Messages
4,726,613
Members
5,920
Latest member
CoachDiddi

Online statistics

Members online
291
Guests online
2,433
Total visitors
2,724


Top Bottom