Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SWC75, post: 3306532, member: 289"] I will again be doing a report after each game this season and a summary report at the end of the non-conference season, the ACC season and the post season. Net Points (points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls) Elijah Hughes +28NP in 39 minutes = +463/1039 = +17.8NP/40 for season Bourama Sidibie +24NP in 27 minutes = +223/622 = +14.3NP/40 for season Joe Girard +11NP in 37 minutes = +290/919 = +12.6NP/40 for season Brycen Goodine +7NP in 18 minutes = +21/179 = +4.7NP/40 for season Quincy Guerrier +3NP in 25 minutes = +179/554 = +12.9NP/40 for season Marek Dolezaj +3NP in 33 minutes = +327/909 = +14.4NP/40 for season Howard Washington +1NP in 2 minutes = +34/128 = +10.6NP/40 for season Jesse Edwards 0NP in 1 minutes = +50/131 = +15.3NP/40 for season Buddy Boeheim -4NP in 14 minutes = +241/990 = +9.7NP/40 for season DNP coach’s decision none Injured Robert Braswell 0NP in 0 minutes = +13/48 = +10.8NP/40 for season Jalen Carey 0NP in 0 minutes = -3/23 = -5.2NP/40 for season Suspended None Redshirting John Bol Ajak Out for the year None Left Team None Awards Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog) (Points plus assists) Elijah Hughes 25 points and 3 assists = 28 Shooting Efficiency (Points minus missed field goal and free throw attempts) Elijah Hughes 25 points – 7 mfg – 1 mft = +17 Scoring Efficiency (Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points) Bourama Sidibie 13 points of 18 = 72.2% Sat Us Down (Who scored the first SU basket of each half?) 1st Half- Bourama Sidibie lay-up at 19:31 2nd Half- Elijah Hughes trey at 18:26 TACO Bell MVP (Who scored the point that got us to 70 points) Brendan Paul with a trey at 0:02 My Man (Who played the most minutes?) Elijah Hughes 39 minutes TEAM STATS Possession Rebounding (Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that) We rebounded 10 of our 34 misses = 29.4% They rebounded 8 of their 39 misses = 20.5% Effective Offensive Rebounding (Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds) We got 12 points on 10 O-Rebs = 1.200 points/O-Reb They got 10 points on 8 O-Rebs = 1.250 points/O-Reb Unforced Turnovers (Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers) We had 15 turnovers – 8 steals = 7 unforced They had 16 turnovers – 9 steals = 7 unforced Points per Takeover (Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had) We had 16 points from 16 takeovers = 1.000 points/takeaway They had 13 points from 15 takeovers = 0.867 points/takeaway Unsettled Situations (Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeover: [Second Chance Point s+ Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers) We had 28 points in 26 unsettled situations = 1.077 points They had 23 points in 23 unsettled situations = 1.000 points Manufactured Possessions (One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers) We had 41 + 16 = 57 They had 32 + 15 = 47 Hustle Stats One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + steals + blocks. I decided to keep track of that, too: We had 41 + 5 + 9 = 55 They had 32 + 2 + 8= 42 Scoring Shooting (Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws) We were 18 for 34 on twos, (52.9%), 8 for 22 on threes (36.4%) and 12 for 19 on frees (63.2%) They were 10 for 29 on twos, (34.5%), 6 for 26 on threes (23.1%) and 11 for 14 on frees (78.6%) Combined percentages were: 1525 (529 + 364 + 632) vs. 1362 (345 + 231 + 786) = +163 Points (PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum” POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots) TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, (two point jumpers from outside the paint) FBP = fast break points POTO= points off turnovers We had 32 PIP, 28 POP, 24 OL, 4 TZ, 16 POTO, 16 FBP They had 18 PIP, 20 POP, 18 OL, 2 TZ, 13 POTO, 9 FBP Fast Break Percentage (FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals) We scored 16 FBP in 45 opportunities (38.6%) They scored 9 FBP in 34 opportunities (26.5%) First Chance/Second Chance (FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.) We had 32 FCP and 12 SCP They had 19 FCP and 10 SCP Starters/Bench (Total points – bench points = starters points) Our starters scored 60 points and our bench scored 12 points Their starters scored 23 points and their bench scored 26 points Assists (The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted) We assisted 16 of our 26 field goals = 61.5% They assisted 10 of their 16 field goals = 62.5% Team Offensive Possession Efficiency (Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions) We scored 72 points in 70 possessions = 1.029 points/ possession They scored 49 points in 70 possessions = 0.700 points/possession It was a 146 possession game. If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession: We scored 72 points in 65 possessions = 1.108 points/ possession They scored 49 points in 62 possessions = 0.790 points/possession Team Shooting Efficiency (Points minus missed field goals and free throws) We scored 72 points, missed 30 field goals and missed 7 free throws = net +35 They scored 49 points, missed 39 field goals and missed 3 free throws = net +7 (Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot) We scored 72 on 34 two point attempts, 22 three point attempts and 19 free throw attempts = 72 of a possible 153 points = 47.1% of possible points scored. They scored 49 on 29 two point attempts, 26 three point attempts and 14 free throw attempts = 49 of a possible 150 points = 32.7% of possible points scored. Breakdown by Quarters (Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one) 15-11, 22-10, 25-16, 10-12 Fouls (Two point shots and free throws attempted per times fouled.) We attempted 34 two point shots, attempted 19 free throws and were fouled 17 times = 2.00; 1.12 They attempted 29 two point shots, attempted 14 free throws and were fouled 13 times = 2.23; 1.08 We were more likely to get calls when attempting two point shots and got more shots per foul. Comments - Pitt’s bench out-scored ours 12-26 but our starters out-scored theirs 60-23. 60-23!!! - Pitt scored 49 points in 70 possessions, an average of 0.700 points per possession. The only worse scoring effort by an SU opponent this year was Bucknell, 0.616. But that’s still better than SU did in the opener in the Dome against Virginia, 0.576. - Pitt’s +7 shooting efficiency, (points minus missed FG and FT), has been topped, (bottomed?) by Virginia II, (+4) and Boston College I (+5) but also by SU in Virginia I (-12, the only minus figure of the season.) [/QUOTE]

Verification: What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?