SWC75
Bored Historian
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 32,462
- Like
- 62,627
I will again be doing a report after each game this season and a summary report at the end of each month. (I’ve eliminated some stats from previous years to streamline this post.)
Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)
Buddy Boeheim +24NP in 40 minutes = +229NP in 603 minutes = +15.2NP/40 for season
Jimmy Boeheim +21NP in 35 minutes = +210NP in 553 minutes = +15.2NP/40 for season
Jesse Edwards +11NP in 32 minutes = +225NP in 448 minutes = +20.1NP/40 for season
Cole Swider +7NP in 38 minutes = +197NP in 546 minutes = +14.4NP/40 for season
Joe Girard +2NP in 28 minutes = +196NP in 537 minutes = +14.6NP/40 for season
Frank Anselem +2NP in 7 minutes = +40NP in 157 minutes = +10.2NP/40 for season
Symir Torrence +2NP in 12 minutes = +43NP in 183 minutes = +9.4NP/40 for season
John Bol Ajak 0NP in 4 minutes = +5NP in 17 minutes = +11.8NP/40 for season
Benny Williams 0NP in 4 minutes = +14NP in 211 minutes = +2.7NP/40 for season
DNP coach’s decision
Chaz Owens 0NP in 0 minutes = +4NP in 4 minutes = +40.0NP/40 for season
Bourama Sidibie 0NP in 0 minutes = 0NP in 5 minutes = 0.0NP/40 for season
Injured or ill and couldn’t play
None
Suspended
None
Redshirting
None (that we know of)
Out for the year
None
Left Team
None
Awards
Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Buddy Boeheim 24 points and 3 assists = 27
Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goal and free throw attempts)
Buddy Boeheim 24 points – 6mfg – 1mft = +17
Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Jimmy Boeheim 18 points of 26 = 69.2%
My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Buddy Boeheim 40 minutes
TEAM STATS
Possession
Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 12 of our 29 misses = 41.4%
They rebounded 12 of their 30 misses = 40.0%
Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 14 points on 12 O-Rebs = 1.167 points/O-Reb
They got 12 points on 12 O-Rebs = 1.000 points/O-Reb
Points per Takeover
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 13 points from 9 takeovers = 1.444 points/takeaway
They had 13 points from 13 takeovers = 1.000 points/takeaway
Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeover: [Second Chance Points+ Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 25 points in 21 unsettled situations = 1.190 points/situation
They had 27 points in 25 unsettled situations = 1.080 points/situation
Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 30 + 13 = 43
They had 29 + 9 = 38
Scoring
Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 19 for 32 on twos, (59.4%), 6 for 17 on threes (35.3%) and 21 for 31 on frees (67.7%)
They were 11 for 25 on twos, (44.0%), 7 for 22 on threes (31.8%) and 18 for 26 on frees (69.2%)
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, (two point jumpers from outside the paint)
FT = Free Throws
We had 32 PIP, 27 POP, 18 OL, 6 TZ, 21 FT
They had 16 PIP, 24 POP, 21 OL, 6 TZ, 18 FT
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 7 FBP in 34 opportunities (20.6%)
They scored 9 FBP in 22 opportunities (40.9%)
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 35 FCP and 14 SCP
They had 22 FCP and 12 SCP
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 72 points and our bench scored 5 points.
Their starters scored 53 points and their bench scored 8 points.
Efficiency
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 10 of our 18 field goals = 53.6%
They assisted 13 of their 25 field goals = 52.0%
Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 77 points in 61 possessions = 1.262 points/ possession
They scored 61 points in 60 possessions = 1.017 points/possession
It was a 121-possession game.
If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession:
We scored 77 points in 64 possessions = 1.203 points/ possession
They scored 61 points in 59 possessions = 1.034 points/possession
Team Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)
We scored 77 points, missed 24 field goals and missed 10 free throws = net +43
They scored 61 points, missed 29 field goals and missed 8 free throws = net +24
(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)
We scored 77 on 32 two-point attempts, 17 three-point attempts and 31 free throw attempts = 77 of a possible 146 points = 52.7% of possible points scored.
They scored 61 on 25 two-point attempts, 22 three-point attempts and 26 free throw attempts = 61 of a possible 142 points = 43.0% of possible points scored.
Fouls
(Most fouls are called on two point shot attempts.)
We attempted 32 two-point shots and were fouled 19 times = 1.684
They attempted 25 two-point shots and were fouled 20 times = 1.125
If they’d attempted 32 two-point field goals at that rate, they’d have been fouled 26 times.
Comments:
- Buddy Boeheim was 5 for 8 from three but his teammates were only 1 for 9. As a team we were 1 for 7 in the second half – and yet we won that half 42-27.
- We shot 59.4% on two pointers and out-scored Pitt in the Paint 32-16. In the three straight losses we were 40.0%, 44.4% and 41.3% from two and were out-scored in the paint 70-93.
- In this game, we were fouled 19 times on 32 two point shots. Against Wake Forest we were fouled 11 times on 46 two point shots.
Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)
Buddy Boeheim +24NP in 40 minutes = +229NP in 603 minutes = +15.2NP/40 for season
Jimmy Boeheim +21NP in 35 minutes = +210NP in 553 minutes = +15.2NP/40 for season
Jesse Edwards +11NP in 32 minutes = +225NP in 448 minutes = +20.1NP/40 for season
Cole Swider +7NP in 38 minutes = +197NP in 546 minutes = +14.4NP/40 for season
Joe Girard +2NP in 28 minutes = +196NP in 537 minutes = +14.6NP/40 for season
Frank Anselem +2NP in 7 minutes = +40NP in 157 minutes = +10.2NP/40 for season
Symir Torrence +2NP in 12 minutes = +43NP in 183 minutes = +9.4NP/40 for season
John Bol Ajak 0NP in 4 minutes = +5NP in 17 minutes = +11.8NP/40 for season
Benny Williams 0NP in 4 minutes = +14NP in 211 minutes = +2.7NP/40 for season
DNP coach’s decision
Chaz Owens 0NP in 0 minutes = +4NP in 4 minutes = +40.0NP/40 for season
Bourama Sidibie 0NP in 0 minutes = 0NP in 5 minutes = 0.0NP/40 for season
Injured or ill and couldn’t play
None
Suspended
None
Redshirting
None (that we know of)
Out for the year
None
Left Team
None
Awards
Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Buddy Boeheim 24 points and 3 assists = 27
Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goal and free throw attempts)
Buddy Boeheim 24 points – 6mfg – 1mft = +17
Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Jimmy Boeheim 18 points of 26 = 69.2%
My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Buddy Boeheim 40 minutes
TEAM STATS
Possession
Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 12 of our 29 misses = 41.4%
They rebounded 12 of their 30 misses = 40.0%
Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 14 points on 12 O-Rebs = 1.167 points/O-Reb
They got 12 points on 12 O-Rebs = 1.000 points/O-Reb
Points per Takeover
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 13 points from 9 takeovers = 1.444 points/takeaway
They had 13 points from 13 takeovers = 1.000 points/takeaway
Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeover: [Second Chance Points+ Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 25 points in 21 unsettled situations = 1.190 points/situation
They had 27 points in 25 unsettled situations = 1.080 points/situation
Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 30 + 13 = 43
They had 29 + 9 = 38
Scoring
Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 19 for 32 on twos, (59.4%), 6 for 17 on threes (35.3%) and 21 for 31 on frees (67.7%)
They were 11 for 25 on twos, (44.0%), 7 for 22 on threes (31.8%) and 18 for 26 on frees (69.2%)
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, (two point jumpers from outside the paint)
FT = Free Throws
We had 32 PIP, 27 POP, 18 OL, 6 TZ, 21 FT
They had 16 PIP, 24 POP, 21 OL, 6 TZ, 18 FT
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 7 FBP in 34 opportunities (20.6%)
They scored 9 FBP in 22 opportunities (40.9%)
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 35 FCP and 14 SCP
They had 22 FCP and 12 SCP
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 72 points and our bench scored 5 points.
Their starters scored 53 points and their bench scored 8 points.
Efficiency
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 10 of our 18 field goals = 53.6%
They assisted 13 of their 25 field goals = 52.0%
Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 77 points in 61 possessions = 1.262 points/ possession
They scored 61 points in 60 possessions = 1.017 points/possession
It was a 121-possession game.
If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession:
We scored 77 points in 64 possessions = 1.203 points/ possession
They scored 61 points in 59 possessions = 1.034 points/possession
Team Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)
We scored 77 points, missed 24 field goals and missed 10 free throws = net +43
They scored 61 points, missed 29 field goals and missed 8 free throws = net +24
(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)
We scored 77 on 32 two-point attempts, 17 three-point attempts and 31 free throw attempts = 77 of a possible 146 points = 52.7% of possible points scored.
They scored 61 on 25 two-point attempts, 22 three-point attempts and 26 free throw attempts = 61 of a possible 142 points = 43.0% of possible points scored.
Fouls
(Most fouls are called on two point shot attempts.)
We attempted 32 two-point shots and were fouled 19 times = 1.684
They attempted 25 two-point shots and were fouled 20 times = 1.125
If they’d attempted 32 two-point field goals at that rate, they’d have been fouled 26 times.
Comments:
- Buddy Boeheim was 5 for 8 from three but his teammates were only 1 for 9. As a team we were 1 for 7 in the second half – and yet we won that half 42-27.
- We shot 59.4% on two pointers and out-scored Pitt in the Paint 32-16. In the three straight losses we were 40.0%, 44.4% and 41.3% from two and were out-scored in the paint 70-93.
- In this game, we were fouled 19 times on 32 two point shots. Against Wake Forest we were fouled 11 times on 46 two point shots.
