SWC75
Bored Historian
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 33,812
- Like
- 65,183
I will again be doing a report after each game this season and a summary report at the end of each month. (I’ve eliminated some stats from previous years to streamline this post.)
Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)
(season totals double-checked from Cuse.com stats on 3/1)
Quincy Guerrier +16NP in 36 minutes = +85NP in 125 minutes = +27.2NP/40 for season
Kadary Richmond +11NP in 37 minutes = +60NP in 112 minutes = +21.4NP/40 for season
Marek Dolezaj +10NP in 37minutes = +61NP in 129 minutes = +18.9NP/40 for season
Alan Griffin +9NP in 37 minutes = +60NP in 135 minutes = +17.8NP/40 for season
Woody Newton +3NP in 9 minutes = +26NP in 45 minutes = +23.1NP/40 for season
Robert Braswell +2NP in 3 minutes = -6NP in 30 minutes = -8.0NP/40 for season
John Bol Ajak +1NP in 7 minutes = +1NP in 23 minutes = +1.7NP/40 for season
Joe Girard +1NP in 34 minutes = +19NP in 138 minutes = +5.5NP/40 for season
DNP coach’s decision
Frank Anselem (+5NP in 17minutes = +11.8NP/40 for season)
Jesse Edwards (+1NP in 8 minutes = +5.0NP/40 for season)
Chaz Owens
Injured and couldn’t play
Bourama Sidibie (+1NP in 4 minutes = +10.0NP/40 for season)
Suspended
Buddy Boeheim (+17NP in 37 minutes = +18.4NP/40 for season)
Redshirting
None (that we know of)
Out for the year
None
Left Team
None
Awards
Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Alan Griffin 20 points and 1 assists = 21
Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goal and free throw attempts)
Quincy Guerrier 18 points – 3mfg – 2mft = +13
Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Quincy Guerrier 18 points of 28 = 64.3%
My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Marek Dolezaj, Alan Griffin and Kadary Richmond 37 minutes
TEAM STATS
Possession
Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 7 of our 36 misses = 19.4%
They rebounded 13 of their 32 misses = 40.6%
Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 10 points on 7 O-Rebs = 1.429 points/O-Reb
They got 9 points on 13 O-Rebs = 0.692 points/O-Reb
Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 12 turnovers – 6 steals = 6 unforced
They had 17 turnovers – 10 steals = 7 unforced
Points per Takeover
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 16 points from 17 takeovers = 0.941 points/takeaway
They had 12 points from 12 takeovers = 1.000 points/takeaway
Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeover: [Second Chance Points+ Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 26 points in 24 unsettled situations = 1.083 points
They had 21 points in 25 unsettled situations = 0.840 points
Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 26 + 17 = 43
They had 42 + 12 = 54
Hustle Stats
One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + steals + blocks. I decided to keep track of that, too:
We had 26 + 1 + 10 = 37
They had 42 + 2 + 6 = 50
Scoring
Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 17 for 32 on twos, (53.1%), 7 for 26 on threes (26.9%) and 14 for 20 on frees (70.0%)
They were 19 for 34 on twos, (55.9%), 9 for 24 on threes (37.5%) and 14 for 18 on frees (77.8%)
Combined percentages were: 531 + 269 + 700 = 1,500 vs. 559 + 375 + 778 = 1,712 = -212
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, (two point jumpers from outside the paint)
FBP = fast break points
POTO= points off turnovers
We had 30 PIP, 25 POP, 21 OL, 4 TZ, 16 POTO, 14 FBP
They had 32 PIP, 33 POP, 27 OL, 6 TZ, 12 POTO, 21 FBP
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 14 FBP in 30 opportunities (46.7%)
They scored 21 FBP in 37 opportunities (56.8%)
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 31 FCP and 10 SCP
They had 35 FCP and 9 SCP
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 61 points and our bench scored 8 points
Their starters scored 68 points and their bench scored 11 points
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 16 of our 24 field goals = 66.7%
They assisted 19 of their 28 field goals = 67.9%
Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 69 points in 72 possessions = 0.958 points/ possession
They scored 79 points in 71 possessions = 1.113 points/possession
It was a 143 possession game.
If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession:
We scored 69 points in 68 possessions = 1.015 points/ possession
They scored 79 points in 67 possessions = 1.179 points/possession
Team Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)
We scored 69 points, missed 34 field goals and missed 6 free throws = net +29
They scored 79 points, missed 30 field goals and missed 4 free throws = net +45
(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)
We scored 69 on 32 two point attempts, 26 three point attempts and 20 free throw attempts = 69 of a possible 162 points = 42.6% of possible points scored.
They scored 79 on 34 two point attempts, 24 three point attempts and 18 free throw attempts = 79 of a possible 158 points = 50.0% of possible points scored.
Fouls
(Most fouls are called on two point shot attempts.)
We attempted 32 two point shots and were fouled 17 times = 1.88
They attempted 34 two point shots and were fouled 16 times = 2.125
Comments
- It’s early but if you look at the NP per 40 it’s hard not to include that the top 5 guys are our best line-up right now. Of course, Buddy’s about to be back and that will change things. But it might still be our best line-up.
- I may be a small difference but our turnovers this season have been 14, 17, 16 and 12 – and the 12 came against the best of those teams.
- In the Niagara and Rider games second chance points were a total of 37-4 and we won those games by a combined 65 points. In the Bryant and Rutgers games, it was 21-18 and we were outscored in those game by 9 points.
- It was a rare game in which our starters got out-scored, 61-68.
Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)
(season totals double-checked from Cuse.com stats on 3/1)
Quincy Guerrier +16NP in 36 minutes = +85NP in 125 minutes = +27.2NP/40 for season
Kadary Richmond +11NP in 37 minutes = +60NP in 112 minutes = +21.4NP/40 for season
Marek Dolezaj +10NP in 37minutes = +61NP in 129 minutes = +18.9NP/40 for season
Alan Griffin +9NP in 37 minutes = +60NP in 135 minutes = +17.8NP/40 for season
Woody Newton +3NP in 9 minutes = +26NP in 45 minutes = +23.1NP/40 for season
Robert Braswell +2NP in 3 minutes = -6NP in 30 minutes = -8.0NP/40 for season
John Bol Ajak +1NP in 7 minutes = +1NP in 23 minutes = +1.7NP/40 for season
Joe Girard +1NP in 34 minutes = +19NP in 138 minutes = +5.5NP/40 for season
DNP coach’s decision
Frank Anselem (+5NP in 17minutes = +11.8NP/40 for season)
Jesse Edwards (+1NP in 8 minutes = +5.0NP/40 for season)
Chaz Owens
Injured and couldn’t play
Bourama Sidibie (+1NP in 4 minutes = +10.0NP/40 for season)
Suspended
Buddy Boeheim (+17NP in 37 minutes = +18.4NP/40 for season)
Redshirting
None (that we know of)
Out for the year
None
Left Team
None
Awards
Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Alan Griffin 20 points and 1 assists = 21
Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goal and free throw attempts)
Quincy Guerrier 18 points – 3mfg – 2mft = +13
Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Quincy Guerrier 18 points of 28 = 64.3%
My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Marek Dolezaj, Alan Griffin and Kadary Richmond 37 minutes
TEAM STATS
Possession
Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 7 of our 36 misses = 19.4%
They rebounded 13 of their 32 misses = 40.6%
Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 10 points on 7 O-Rebs = 1.429 points/O-Reb
They got 9 points on 13 O-Rebs = 0.692 points/O-Reb
Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 12 turnovers – 6 steals = 6 unforced
They had 17 turnovers – 10 steals = 7 unforced
Points per Takeover
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 16 points from 17 takeovers = 0.941 points/takeaway
They had 12 points from 12 takeovers = 1.000 points/takeaway
Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeover: [Second Chance Points+ Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 26 points in 24 unsettled situations = 1.083 points
They had 21 points in 25 unsettled situations = 0.840 points
Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 26 + 17 = 43
They had 42 + 12 = 54
Hustle Stats
One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + steals + blocks. I decided to keep track of that, too:
We had 26 + 1 + 10 = 37
They had 42 + 2 + 6 = 50
Scoring
Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 17 for 32 on twos, (53.1%), 7 for 26 on threes (26.9%) and 14 for 20 on frees (70.0%)
They were 19 for 34 on twos, (55.9%), 9 for 24 on threes (37.5%) and 14 for 18 on frees (77.8%)
Combined percentages were: 531 + 269 + 700 = 1,500 vs. 559 + 375 + 778 = 1,712 = -212
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, (two point jumpers from outside the paint)
FBP = fast break points
POTO= points off turnovers
We had 30 PIP, 25 POP, 21 OL, 4 TZ, 16 POTO, 14 FBP
They had 32 PIP, 33 POP, 27 OL, 6 TZ, 12 POTO, 21 FBP
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 14 FBP in 30 opportunities (46.7%)
They scored 21 FBP in 37 opportunities (56.8%)
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 31 FCP and 10 SCP
They had 35 FCP and 9 SCP
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 61 points and our bench scored 8 points
Their starters scored 68 points and their bench scored 11 points
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 16 of our 24 field goals = 66.7%
They assisted 19 of their 28 field goals = 67.9%
Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 69 points in 72 possessions = 0.958 points/ possession
They scored 79 points in 71 possessions = 1.113 points/possession
It was a 143 possession game.
If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession:
We scored 69 points in 68 possessions = 1.015 points/ possession
They scored 79 points in 67 possessions = 1.179 points/possession
Team Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)
We scored 69 points, missed 34 field goals and missed 6 free throws = net +29
They scored 79 points, missed 30 field goals and missed 4 free throws = net +45
(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)
We scored 69 on 32 two point attempts, 26 three point attempts and 20 free throw attempts = 69 of a possible 162 points = 42.6% of possible points scored.
They scored 79 on 34 two point attempts, 24 three point attempts and 18 free throw attempts = 79 of a possible 158 points = 50.0% of possible points scored.
Fouls
(Most fouls are called on two point shot attempts.)
We attempted 32 two point shots and were fouled 17 times = 1.88
They attempted 34 two point shots and were fouled 16 times = 2.125
Comments
- It’s early but if you look at the NP per 40 it’s hard not to include that the top 5 guys are our best line-up right now. Of course, Buddy’s about to be back and that will change things. But it might still be our best line-up.
- I may be a small difference but our turnovers this season have been 14, 17, 16 and 12 – and the 12 came against the best of those teams.
- In the Niagara and Rider games second chance points were a total of 37-4 and we won those games by a combined 65 points. In the Bryant and Rutgers games, it was 21-18 and we were outscored in those game by 9 points.
- It was a rare game in which our starters got out-scored, 61-68.