Net Points, etc, - UNC II | Syracusefan.com

Net Points, etc, - UNC II

SWC75

Bored Historian
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
32,278
Like
62,396
I will again be doing a report after each game this season and a summary report at the end of each month. (I’ve eliminated some stats from previous years to streamline this post.)

Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)

Quincy Guerrier +19NP in 32 minutes = +363NP in 733 minutes = +19.8NP/40 for season
Buddy Boeheim +17NP in 39 minutes = +195NP in 681 minutes = +11.5NP/40 for season
Marek Dolezaj +13NP in 36 minutes = +284NP in 767 minutes = +14.8NP/40 for season
Jesse Edwards +11NP in 24 minutes = +26NP in 95 minutes = +10.9NP/40 for season
Kadary Richmond +9NP in 31 minutes = +196NP in 491 minutes = +16.0NP/40 for season
Alan Griffin +2NP in 23 minutes = +321NP in 697 minutes = +18.4NP/40 for season
Robert Braswell 0NP in 5 minutes = +30NP in 147 minutes = +8.2NP/40 for season
Joe Girard -1NP in 10 minutes = +168NP in 614 minutes = +10.9NP/40 for season

DNP coach’s decision
John Bol Ajak 0NP in 0 minutes = -1NP in 50 minutes = -0.8NP/40 for season
Frank Anselem 0NP in 0 minutes = +5NP in 26 minutes = +7.7NP/40 for season
Woody Newton 0NP in 0 minutes = +31NP in 86 minutes = +14.4NP/40 for season
Chaz Owens 0NP in 0 minute = 0NP in 1 minute = 0.0NP/40 for season

Injured and couldn’t play
Bourama Sidibie 0NP in 0 minutes = 0NP in 15 minutes = 0.0NP/40 for season

Suspended

Redshirting
None (that we know of)

Out for the year
None

Left Team
None


Awards

Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Buddy Boeheim 26 points and 2 assists = 28

Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goal and free throw attempts)
Buddy Boeheim 26 points – 11 mfg – 1 mft = +14

Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Quincy Guerrier 18 points of 31 = 58.1%

My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Buddy Boeheim 39 minutes

TEAM STATS

Possession

Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 13 of our 40 misses = 32.5%
They rebounded 26 of their 46 misses = 56.5%

Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 10 points on 13 O-Rebs = 0.769 points/O-Reb
They got 25 points on 26 O-Rebs = 0.962 points/O-Reb

Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 12 turnovers – 6 steals = 6 unforced
They had 20 turnovers – 15 steals = 5 unforced

Points per Takeover
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 28 points from 20 takeovers = 1.400 points/takeaway
They had 9 points from 12 takeovers = 0.750 points/takeaway

Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeover: [Second Chance Points+ Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 38 points in 33 unsettled situations = 1.152 points
They had 34 points in 38 unsettled situations = 0.894 points

Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 33 + 20 = 53
They had 53 + 9 = 62

Hustle Stats
One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + blocks + steals. I decided to keep track of that, too:
We had 33 + 9 + 15 = 57
They had 53 + 1 + 6 = 60

Scoring

Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 19 for 39 on twos, (48.7%), 8 for 27 on threes (29.6%) and 10 for 14 on frees (71.4%)
They were 22 for 48 on twos, (45.8%), 4 for 20 on threes (25.0%) and 14 for 22 on frees (63.6%)
Combined percentages were: 487 + 296 + 714 = 1,497 vs. 458 + 250 + 636 = 1,344 = +153

Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, (two point jumpers from outside the paint)
FBP = fast break points
POTO= points off turnovers

We had 32 PIP, 30 POP, 24 OL, 6 TZ, 28 POTO, 20 FBP
They had 38 PIP, 18 POP, 12 OL, 6 TZ, 9 POTO, 9 FBP

Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 20 FBP in 37 opportunities (54.1%)
They scored 9 FBP in 33 opportunities (27.3%)

First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 32 FCP and 10 SCP
They had 22 FCP and 25 SCP

Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 60 points and our bench scored 12 points.
Their starters scored 47 points and their bench scored 23 points.

Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 18 of our 27 field goals = 66.7%
They assisted 16 of their 26 field goals = 61.5%

Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 72 points in 72 possessions = 1.000 points/ possession
They scored 70 points in 72 possessions = 0.972 points/possession
It was a 144-possession game.

If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession:
We scored 72 points in 73 possessions = 0.986 points/ possession
They scored 70 points in 78 possessions = 1.029 points/possession

Team Shooting Efficiency

(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)

We scored 72 points, missed 39 field goals and missed 4 free throws = net +29
They scored 70 points, missed 42 field goals and missed 8 free throws = net +20

(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)

We scored 72 on 39 two point attempts, 27 three point attempts and 14 free throw attempts = 72 of a possible 173 points = 41.6% of possible points scored.
They scored 70 on 48 two point attempts, 20 three point attempts and 22 free throw attempts = 70 of a possible 178 points = 39.3% of possible points scored.


Fouls

(Most fouls are called on two point shot attempts.)
We attempted 39 two point shots and were fouled 16 times = 2.44
They attempted 48 two point shots and were fouled 18 times = 2.67
At this rate, if we’d taken 48 two point shots, we’d have been fouled 20 times.


Comments

- Normally the defensive team will get 2/3 of the rebounds. Basically, if you don’t get the rebound, you haven’t played defense at all. Two team’s in SU’s games this year have gotten rebounds on more than 50% of their misses and both were North Carolina: 24/45 = 53.3% in the first game and 26/46 = 56.5% in this one.

- The Tar Heels got 101 of the 165 rebounds in the two games – yet we can close to sweeping them. We must be really good at other stuff.

- Here’s one: 15 steals. 15!

- We had 9 blocked shots to 1 against a bigger team.

- Any time you have 20 fast break points to 9 for North Carolina, you’ve got a shot to win.

- Or 28 points off turnovers negated their 25 second chance points.

- Jim Boeheim has always argued against trying to wear down a team with waves of players. He figures his starters will prove better than your second wave. Ray Williams replaced starting line-ups like hockey teams replace attack lines. 5 guys would go out and 5 other guys would come in. Boeheim loved it when Armando Bacot (18 points and 15 rebounds) came out and Walker Kessler (4 points and 3 rebounds) came in to the g
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
167,141
Messages
4,682,919
Members
5,901
Latest member
CarlsbergMD

Online statistics

Members online
29
Guests online
895
Total visitors
924


Top Bottom