SWC75
Bored Historian
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 33,595
- Like
- 64,677
Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)
Andrew White 21 in 40 minutes
Tyus Battle 18 in 39 minutes
Tyler Lydon 14 in 40 minutes
Tyler Roberson 7 in 27 minutes
John Gillon 7 in 37 minutes
Taurean Thompson 1 in 13 minutes
Franklin Howard 0 in 4 minutes
DaJuan Coleman DNP
Paschal Chukwu injured
Awards
Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Andrew White 25
Scoring Efficiency
(Points minus field goal and free throw attempts)
Tyus Battle 17
Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half)
1st Half- Andrew White with a jumper at 18:21
2nd Half- Tyus Battle with a trey at 19:30
TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub)
No tacos for us, for the first time sicne the Notre Dame game. Virginia doesn’t let you get Tacos.
My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Tyler Lydon and Andrew White 40 minutes
Team Stats:
POSSESSION
Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 4 of our 21 misses = 19.0%
They rebounded 7 of their 26 misses = 26.4%
Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 7 points on 4 O-Rebs = 1.75 points
They got 6 points on 7 O-Rebs = 0.86 points
Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 12 turnovers – 6 steals = 6 unforced
They had 15 turnovers – 11 steals = 4 unforced
Points per Takeaway
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 20 points from 15 takeaways = 1.33 points
They had 15 points from 12 takeaways =1.25 points
Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeaway: [Second Chance Point + Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 27 points in 19 unsettled situations = 1.42
They had 21 points in 19 unsettled situations = 1.11
Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 23 + 15= 38
They had 24 + 12 = 36
Scoring
Shooting
(shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 16 for 24 on twos, (.667), 7 for 18 on threes (.389) and 13 for 20 on frees (.650)
They were 12 for 26 on twos, (.462), 12 for 24 on threes (.500) and 2 for 5 on frees (.400)
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP –free throws made, TREY: points from three point shots, TZ= Twilight Zone, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points POTO= points off turnovers)
We had 22 PIP, 31 POP, 21 TREY, 10 TZ, 11 FBP, 20 POTO
They had 20 PIP, 40 POP, 36 TREY, 4 TZ, 3 FBP, 15 POTO
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made, courtesy of Pat. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 35 FCP and 7 SCP
They had 51 FCP and 6 SCP
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 62 points and our bench scored 4 points
Their starters scored 29 points and their bench scored 33 points
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 12 of our 23 field goals, 52.2%
They assisted 21 of their 24 field goals 87.5%
Team Offensive Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 66 points in 60 possessions = 1.100 points/possession
They scored 62 points in 60 possessions = 1.033 points/ possession
It was a 120 possession game
Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)
11-16, 11-18, 21-5, 23-23
Fouls
(Two point shots, points in paint and free throws attempted per times fouled.)
We attempted 24 two point shots, scored 22 points in the paint, attempted 20 free throws and were fouled 15 times = 1.60, 1.42, 1.33
They attempted 26 two point shots, scored 20 points in the paint, attempted 5 free throws and were fouled 9 times = 2.89, 2.22, 0.56
Comments:
- We talk all the time about offense and defense but our rebounding is a concern. There haven’t been a lot of rebounds to get in these last two games but we’ve gotten only 10 offensive rebounds on 46 misses (21.7%). We’ve been outrebounded by this measure in 8 of 11 conference games, averaging getting only 30% of our misses compared to 37% for our opponents.
- We’ve led in points from takeaways and points per takeaway for four games in a row – and won four games in a row. We’ve had 74 points on 54 takeaways and our opponents have had 53 points on 51 takeaways. That’s +21 points and we’ve eon those games by 26 points, one in over time.
- We were an astonishing 16 for 24 (67%) from two point range against one of the best defenses in the country. We were 10 of 13 in the second half: 77%!
- Fast break points in the first half: Syracuse 2 Virginia 3. Fast break points in the second half: Syracuse 9 Virginia 0. (And we win by 4).
- We are 9-1-1 in conference games from the Twilight Zone, (between the paint and the arc). BC tied us in the second game and Wake beat us 12-6. But overall, we are ahead 114-68 in conference games. That’s +46 points.
- In three of the four wins of this streak, we’ve lost Pat’s “First Chance Points” stat, (total points minus second chance points, fast break points and made free throws). This is a measure of how well we are doing in our initial sets of each possession on both ends. In this game it was 35-51. Against Wake Forest it was 28-34 and against Florida State it was 29-37. Our fast break points in these games were 38-14. Our made free throws were 58-36. We won these games by beating the other team down court and by getting to the line.
- Our starters have scored 162 of our 166 points in the last two games. That’s 97.6%. Virginia’s bench outscored their starters 33-29.
- We had every reason to be depressed at half time: we’d let a competitive game turn into a 22-34 deficit by allowing Virginia to score the last eight points and in conference play we’ve lost the third quarter of games 7 times in 10 games, including the least four. In those last four 3rd quarters, we’d been out-scored 62-102. Any kind of reasonably good start by the Cavaliers would have put this game away. Instead we blitzed them with an 11 point run on the way to a 21-5 third quarter edge, which gave us a lead we never surrendered.
- Despite some bad first half calls, the foul statistics totally favored Syracuse. We were more likely to draw a foul on a two point shot or when scoring in the paint and got more free throws from the fouls that were called and it wasn’t even close.
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)
Andrew White 21 in 40 minutes
Tyus Battle 18 in 39 minutes
Tyler Lydon 14 in 40 minutes
Tyler Roberson 7 in 27 minutes
John Gillon 7 in 37 minutes
Taurean Thompson 1 in 13 minutes
Franklin Howard 0 in 4 minutes
DaJuan Coleman DNP
Paschal Chukwu injured
Awards
Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Andrew White 25
Scoring Efficiency
(Points minus field goal and free throw attempts)
Tyus Battle 17
Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half)
1st Half- Andrew White with a jumper at 18:21
2nd Half- Tyus Battle with a trey at 19:30
TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub)
No tacos for us, for the first time sicne the Notre Dame game. Virginia doesn’t let you get Tacos.
My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Tyler Lydon and Andrew White 40 minutes
Team Stats:
POSSESSION
Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 4 of our 21 misses = 19.0%
They rebounded 7 of their 26 misses = 26.4%
Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 7 points on 4 O-Rebs = 1.75 points
They got 6 points on 7 O-Rebs = 0.86 points
Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 12 turnovers – 6 steals = 6 unforced
They had 15 turnovers – 11 steals = 4 unforced
Points per Takeaway
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 20 points from 15 takeaways = 1.33 points
They had 15 points from 12 takeaways =1.25 points
Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeaway: [Second Chance Point + Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 27 points in 19 unsettled situations = 1.42
They had 21 points in 19 unsettled situations = 1.11
Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 23 + 15= 38
They had 24 + 12 = 36
Scoring
Shooting
(shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 16 for 24 on twos, (.667), 7 for 18 on threes (.389) and 13 for 20 on frees (.650)
They were 12 for 26 on twos, (.462), 12 for 24 on threes (.500) and 2 for 5 on frees (.400)
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP –free throws made, TREY: points from three point shots, TZ= Twilight Zone, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points POTO= points off turnovers)
We had 22 PIP, 31 POP, 21 TREY, 10 TZ, 11 FBP, 20 POTO
They had 20 PIP, 40 POP, 36 TREY, 4 TZ, 3 FBP, 15 POTO
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made, courtesy of Pat. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 35 FCP and 7 SCP
They had 51 FCP and 6 SCP
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 62 points and our bench scored 4 points
Their starters scored 29 points and their bench scored 33 points
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 12 of our 23 field goals, 52.2%
They assisted 21 of their 24 field goals 87.5%
Team Offensive Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 66 points in 60 possessions = 1.100 points/possession
They scored 62 points in 60 possessions = 1.033 points/ possession
It was a 120 possession game
Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)
11-16, 11-18, 21-5, 23-23
Fouls
(Two point shots, points in paint and free throws attempted per times fouled.)
We attempted 24 two point shots, scored 22 points in the paint, attempted 20 free throws and were fouled 15 times = 1.60, 1.42, 1.33
They attempted 26 two point shots, scored 20 points in the paint, attempted 5 free throws and were fouled 9 times = 2.89, 2.22, 0.56
Comments:
- We talk all the time about offense and defense but our rebounding is a concern. There haven’t been a lot of rebounds to get in these last two games but we’ve gotten only 10 offensive rebounds on 46 misses (21.7%). We’ve been outrebounded by this measure in 8 of 11 conference games, averaging getting only 30% of our misses compared to 37% for our opponents.
- We’ve led in points from takeaways and points per takeaway for four games in a row – and won four games in a row. We’ve had 74 points on 54 takeaways and our opponents have had 53 points on 51 takeaways. That’s +21 points and we’ve eon those games by 26 points, one in over time.
- We were an astonishing 16 for 24 (67%) from two point range against one of the best defenses in the country. We were 10 of 13 in the second half: 77%!
- Fast break points in the first half: Syracuse 2 Virginia 3. Fast break points in the second half: Syracuse 9 Virginia 0. (And we win by 4).
- We are 9-1-1 in conference games from the Twilight Zone, (between the paint and the arc). BC tied us in the second game and Wake beat us 12-6. But overall, we are ahead 114-68 in conference games. That’s +46 points.
- In three of the four wins of this streak, we’ve lost Pat’s “First Chance Points” stat, (total points minus second chance points, fast break points and made free throws). This is a measure of how well we are doing in our initial sets of each possession on both ends. In this game it was 35-51. Against Wake Forest it was 28-34 and against Florida State it was 29-37. Our fast break points in these games were 38-14. Our made free throws were 58-36. We won these games by beating the other team down court and by getting to the line.
- Our starters have scored 162 of our 166 points in the last two games. That’s 97.6%. Virginia’s bench outscored their starters 33-29.
- We had every reason to be depressed at half time: we’d let a competitive game turn into a 22-34 deficit by allowing Virginia to score the last eight points and in conference play we’ve lost the third quarter of games 7 times in 10 games, including the least four. In those last four 3rd quarters, we’d been out-scored 62-102. Any kind of reasonably good start by the Cavaliers would have put this game away. Instead we blitzed them with an 11 point run on the way to a 21-5 third quarter edge, which gave us a lead we never surrendered.
- Despite some bad first half calls, the foul statistics totally favored Syracuse. We were more likely to draw a foul on a two point shot or when scoring in the paint and got more free throws from the fouls that were called and it wasn’t even close.