Net Points, etc. - Wake Forest | Syracusefan.com

Net Points, etc. - Wake Forest

SWC75

Bored Historian
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,731
Like
64,945
I will again be doing a report after each game this season and a summary report at the end of the non-conference season, the ACC season and the post season.

Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)

Elijah Hughes +23NP in 40 minutes = +400/881 = +18.2NP/40 for season
Buddy Boeheim +16NP in 40 minutes = +231/833 = +11.1NP/40 for season
Quincy Guerrier +10NP in 15 minutes = +129/428 = +12.1NP/40 for season
Marek Dolezaj +4NP in 34 minutes = +301/776 = +15.5NP/40 for season
Joe Girard +3NP in 38 minutes = +235/734 = +12.8NP/40 for season
Brycen Goodine +2NP in 6 minutes = +16/135 = +4.7NP/40 for season
Jesse Edwards +2NP in 10 minutes = +36/104 = +13.8NP/40 for season
Bourama Sidibie +1NP in 15 minutes = +179/507 = +14.1NP/40 for season
Howard Washington -1NP in 2 minutes = +33/116 = +11.4NP/40 for season

DNP coach’s decision

Injured
Robert Braswell 0NP in 0 minutes = +13/48 = +10.8NP/40 for season
Jalen Carey 0NP in 0 minutes = -3/23 = -5.2NP/40 for season

Suspended
None

Redshirting
John Bol Ajak

Out for the year
None

Left Team
None


Awards

Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Buddy Boeheim 23 points and 1 assist = 24

Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goal and free throw attempts)
Buddy Boeheim 23 points – 9 mfg – 1 mft = +13

Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Quincy Guerrier 13 points of 16 = 81.25%

Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half?)
1st Half- Marek Dolezaj lay-up at 18:50 2nd Half- Buddy Boeheim jumper at 19:03

TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70 points)
Buddy Boeheim lay-up at 1:43

My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Buddy Boeheim and Elijah Hughes 40 minutes


TEAM STATS

Possession

Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 10 of their 38 misses = 26.3%
They rebounded 16 of our 40 misses = 40.0%

Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 13 points on 10 O-Rebs = 1.300 points/O-Reb
They got 18 points on 16 O-Rebs = 1.125 points/O-Reb

Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 11 turnovers – 6 steals = 5 unforced
They had 15 turnovers – 8 steals = 7 unforced

Points per Takeover
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 19 points from 15 takeovers = 1.267 points/takeaway
They had 20 points from 11 takeovers = 1.818 points/takeaway

Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeover: [Second Chance Point s+ Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 32 points in 25 unsettled situations = 1.280 points
They had 38 points in 27 unsettled situations = 1.407 points

Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 34 + 15 = 49
They had 44 + 11 = 55

Hustle Stats
One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + steals + blocks. I decided to keep track of that, too:
We had 34 + 9 + 8 = 51
They had 44 + 3 + 6= 53

Scoring

Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 15 for 35 on twos, (42.9%), 7 for 21 on threes (33.3%) and 24 for 30 on frees (80.0%)
They were 17 for 34 on twos, (50.0%), 6 for 27 on threes (22.2%) and 21 for 27 on frees (77.8%)
Combined percentages were: 1562 (429 + 333 + 800) vs. 1500 (500 + 222 + 778) = +62

Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, (two point jumpers from outside the paint)
FBP = fast break points
POTO= points off turnovers

We had 24 PIP, 27 POP, 21 OL, 6 TZ, 19 POTO, 11 FBP
They had 22 PIP, 30 POP, 18 OL, 12 TZ, 20 POTO, 21 FBP

Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 11 FBP in 41 opportunities (26.8%)
They scored 21 FBP in 37 opportunities (56.8%)

First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 27 FCP and 13 SCP
They had 13 FCP and 18 SCP

Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 59 points and our bench scored 16 points
Their starters scored 44 points and their bench scored 29 points

Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 11 of our 22 field goals = 50.0%
They assisted 15 of their 23 field goals = 65.2%

Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 75 points in 72 possessions = 1.042 points/ possession
They scored 73 points in 73 possessions = 1.000 points/possession
It was a 154 possession game.

If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession:
We scored 75 points in 70 possessions = 1.071 points/ possession
They scored 73 points in 74 possessions = 0.986 points/possession

Team Shooting Efficiency

(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)

We scored 75 points, missed 34 field goals and missed 6 free throws = net +35
They scored 73 points, missed 38 field goals and missed 6 free throws = net +29

(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)

We scored 75 on 35 two point attempts, 21 three point attempts and 30 free throw attempts = 75 of a possible 163 points = 46.0% of possible points scored.
They scored 73 on 34 two point attempts, 27 three point attempts and 27 free throw attempts = 73 of a possible 142 points = 51.4% of possible points scored.

Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)

18-8, 20-22, 24-23, 13-20

Fouls

(Two point shots and free throws attempted per times fouled.)
We attempted 35 two point shots, attempted 30 free throws and were fouled 23 times = 1.52; 1.30
They attempted 34 two point shots, attempted 27 free throws and were fouled 20 times = 1.20; 1.35
They were more likely to get calls when attempting two point shots and got more shots per foul.


Comments
- My rather arbitrary standard for a player good enough to start is to average 10NP per 40 minutes. We are using 9 players and 8 of them meet that standard. And the other one won the game for us.

- Jesse Edwards was credited with no assists. Look at that last play again.

- We were +4 in turnovers but -1 in points off turnovers

- We were -10 in fast break points, (11-21), probably because of all those drives to the basket. They are fine if we score or get to the line, not so good if we miss and they get the rebound with our guys moving forward.

- The two teams got only 40 of their 148 points out of their initial sets (Fist Chance Points). The rest was all second chance points, fast breaks or free throws.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
169,820
Messages
4,855,479
Members
5,981
Latest member
SyraFreed

Online statistics

Members online
31
Guests online
856
Total visitors
887


...
Top Bottom