Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CuSeLaX, post: 2445598, member: 6273"] Numbers can be deceiving. A kid from Michigan can score 100 points in one season playing subpar competition. Same kid wouldn't touch the field on better teams with better competition. A kid like Magnan scores a ton of points sophomore year what changed ? Well teams know who he is. He's getting there best defender and probably getting double teamed. And as far as Archer scoring more points, clearly Archer was a talented player and a senior. Don't underestimate how much a year can change a players game for the better. My main point is ranking players for college lacrosse is impossible now that more than the east coast has talented players. The high school game isn't covered like basketball and football is. So the guys doing the rankings can't possibly have all the information that causes the numbers. Wait to see these kids at Cuse before we decide how there career will go. [/QUOTE]