Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="mantonio, post: 25403, member: 709"] This is very fascinating indeed. Now we have EYEWITNESS accounts of the ball passing through the goal posts! Once again, it is undisputable evidence that the second, side camera angle shows the ball going through the inside of the post. What I find most disturbing about this issue is the carelessness in which the Big East releases a definitive statement about a controversial event, as if it happened exactly the way THEY believe it did... If it is such an open & shut case, then why did the officials rule the original call correct? Although I am a biased observer, the video evidence does reveal discrepancies thusfar, & for the conference to question the officiating in absense of absolute proof is abominable. Now we have ESPN commentators saying Syracuse should have lost the game, 30-29, which is ludicrous, based on Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. Does ESPN use any credible vetting to hire staff? (I'm talking to YOU, Van Pelt!) [/QUOTE]