Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="javadoc, post: 1205750, member: 338"]
If we stayed the course and stank up the joint next year, you could make a case for a 3-year yank.  But consider this line of defense:
[LIST]
[*]First choice as OC did not work out, so we made a change
[*]It takes more than one year for a new offensive scheme to sink in and work to full effect
[*]We didn't necessarily have the personnel to run the new (TL) offense
[*]Most importantly, we didn't have the QB to run it, but we just signed one, with more on the horizon
[*]The QB for the new system might not be ready to play until his RF year, in which case you can't judge the results until after the 2nd year of the new scheme
[/LIST]
This fits the 4-year narrative perfectly.  You know that line of defense is coming, and IMO there is some validity to it.

The defense has been good, so if we're having this conversation again next year, it will be because of the offense.  Do you think Lester is going to succeed next year with our existing QB's?  Long might pan out, but I am not sold on anyone else.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?