Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CardiacCuse, post: 3800806, member: 6979"] well his big impact was in the first...overall he was a plus. what is so confusing about that? why focus on the second...and not eliminating a deficit that he didnt create as a reason to keep him on the bench? he obviously had a good game and was a difference out there...even though the team didnt expand their lead during every single stretch of his play. there was no one else on the team that did as well as he did. Did you watch marek out there??? [/QUOTE]