Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Jack Hall, post: 1302263, member: 3962"]
you seem to be saying TC, G and McC will all be really good next yr and they will be surrounded by a slightly better supporting cast and at the very least more depth. imagine this yrs team if McC is healthy and TC and G had played great the whole season. If  G had played like he is now we probably beat Villanova. (not to mention if G is as good as he is now we might have beat Cal or Mich or StJ). if McC is healthy we might have won 2 of 3 against UNC, Duke and Pitt, at least one. and we probably beat Clemson or Miami. we get those wins we are probably top 15 this yr, especially if we have more depth. imo you overestimate how good college bball is. not too many great teams in the top 15 to say the least. bottom line a nucleus of G, TC, healthy McC, TRob and Kaleb to go w more depth should be as good as any of the mediocre teams comprising the 2nd ten next year and then if Malachi is the real deal we have more upside...all imho. and that assumes rather pessimistically like you that Cole is not healthy and no Bryant.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?