Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="nyucuse, post: 3773368, member: 317"] I take issue with the 'better resume' point. Yes better by computer metrics. But who has uconn beaten? USC, and... Seton Hall? Xavier? Georgetown, yes that one looks better now. VTech, UNC, Clemson is better. It just is. That said, computer metrics do not agree, hence uconn is higher up the S-curve. But beating 1 at large team over the course of the season is hardly something to be proud of. Overall, the profiles are pretty pedestrian and seeding would be similar based on sensible analytics. Doesn't always work that way though. [/QUOTE]