Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Sudano, post: 5322196, member: 822"] I think Title IX is one of the most important foundational educational laws in history. With that said I also think too many people incorrectly confuse fairness in education and incorrectly apply it to private business. University Athletic funding have nothing to do with private business investment. Your last point not only applies for non-revenue women's sports but also men's. It's a Title IX issue and also It's a revenue question. Not just a man vs women's sports issue. If fairness prevails non-revenue athletes will not only retain scholarships but also receive some sort of supplemental payment commensurate with it's non-revenue status. I would think women or non-revenue sports would not demand 50% or a high percentage but rather would just fairly want a thousand or two a month to ensure University payments to athletes adhere to all the appropriate legal cases of NIL, payments, and title IX in relation to their revenue status. [/QUOTE]