Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="maxxyz, post: 1905138, member: 350"] I disagree. Concussion research was well underway 15 years ago, and the NCAA was involved in the process. One email to/from a coach or administrator discussing concussion risks would be enough to prove SU was aware and did nothing. And concussion effects are cumulative, so it doesn't matter if he had his bell wrung previously. SU could be held culpable (how much is the question). Now if he was involved in a major car accident some some other trauma they could point to that as being a major factor, but there is probably video of his games that his lawyers could use to demonstrate that coaches put him back in the game with willful disregard for his safety. Again, if he can prove that SU was aware of the concussion risks (difficult) then proving that his injuries came while at SU becomes less difficult. [/QUOTE]