Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="NKR1978, post: 43525, member: 186"] Using comparative scores is overly simplistic. Syracuse 33, Toledo 30 Toledo 36, Temple 13 Temple 38, Maryland 7 Clemson 56, Maryland 45 Using this comparative "logic" in a vacuum and ignoring reality, what would you conclude in hypothetical matchups: Syracuse vs. Temple Temple vs. Clemson. My guess is we would beat Temple pretty handily. 3+ touchdowns. (With my real world knowledge of the two teams I think we would actually beat them in a pretty tight game). Also, going by just these two scores, Clemson and Temple would be in a tight game throughout with Temple winning. (Clemson would beat Temple by 4 TD's). URI and Tulane were upsetting. Rutgers sucked because 5-1 would have been so nice and give us some breathing room. Oh well. Most people expected 6-6 and a step back from last year, while building to a really good 2012 season. Seems to me we're on track for that or better. [/QUOTE]