Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 2120613, member: 1969"] I have to agree with BPO here. I am not one who has an issue with USC getting in. They were borderline. But their top 50 record is heavily skewed by largely only playing top 15 teams. They were hard to evaluate because they played high level teams in the top 50, but very few mid-level or bubble level teams due to the lack of depth in the Pac-12. They played a ton of crap teams in conference. Committee has no choice but to look at bad losses if they try to compare Syracuse and USC. [/QUOTE]