Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="obliterata, post: 2120642, member: 1167"] USC performed better than SU OOC, no question. In conference they went 1-5 vs the top 3 in the Pac12 during the regular season, SU went 1-3 vs the top 3 in the ACC (UNC, Duke, Lou). Considering the strength of the ACC I think 10-8 SU is better than 10-8 USC. I know USC had to play more bad teams in the Pac12 and couldn't prove themselves vs better competition but that's the way it is. SU had a better record vs the field, I know there are reasons for this and that SU has a built-in advantage playing in the ACC but it's still a fact. SU beat the ACC conference champion and what should've been a #1 seed but the Committee botched that too giving it to UNC instead because it was all decided before the ACCT was held. Considering SU's top 50 record and beating 3 top 10 teams ( ;) ) I'm going to put more weight on the positives than the negatives. [/QUOTE]