Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Cusefan95, post: 5325123, member: 173"] My guess is because we’re in a rapidly changing landscape where laws are trailing the real world, and different states have very different NIL laws that would make consistent application of long-term NIL deals impossible (so the NCAA wouldn’t currently allow it). It’s also a step towards formal professionalization of college athletics that folks like you oppose with some justification. I think we’ll end up with some form of multi-year deals eventually…what that looks like is hard to even guess right now. The current model with everyone on efficiency one-year deals is inherently unstable and cannot last - but there isnt a better structure available right now so we’re going with it for the moment. I’m certain we’re not going to g to be uniformly satisfied with what replaces it though. [/QUOTE]