Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="TheOrangeBuddha, post: 32348, member: 157"] This is why I am wondering why EVERYONE is so excited about not going for it on 4th in short in the first OT. It's not as if it is a given that our defense would have held Rutgers out of the endzone on their possession. The end of game situation where you are bringing the house on a zone bltiz with the ball at the 3 yard line is quite bizarre. I mean was there anyone else on that team they were going to attempt to get the ball to on that play? And we end up with our best interior lineman trying to guard him? Very curious. As a whole, I thought SU got the benefit of most of the "iffy" calls during the game - excluding a drive killing "illegal man downfield" call in the 1st quarter (side judge in front of Marrone claimed Lemon was covering up Stevens [this is the pass to our FB that picked up 10+ to get to midfield] and he could not have been more wrong). [/QUOTE]