Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Btstimpy, post: 1054439, member: 2043"]
Interesting analogy.  I don't think that the B1G will be much of a match for the combined forces of the SEC and the ACC along with ESPN.  That's why I think that the ACC has a bright future, and don't think we need to push Notre Dame to do anything it doesn't want to do.   I do think we need to address this scheduling issue that causes debate about divisions, 9 games vs 8 games, not being able to play the teams from the other divisions because 14 is a bad number.  At every spring meeting, the league revisits it and doesn't seem to get anywhere. 
 
Fourteen is a bad number.  16 is a better number.  If we never have the desire to go past 16 and want Notre Dame to eventually be part of the 16, then a football only would be required to temporarily have 16 without Notre Dame.  That was my only thought on that.  If it is Navy, then we get the sixth ACC game by default with Notre Dame.  We can continue with the 5 game rotation and have Navy be annual.  It is not a long term solution, but it gets the sixth game.  Navy is preparing to be a football only in the American.  The ACC wouldn't be much different from their perspective other than stronger competition.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?