Numbers Game (Week 2) | Syracusefan.com

Numbers Game (Week 2)

Czar

All Conference
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,165
Like
1,469
I'm going to try to do this weekly, it's a rundown of where Syracuse stands in terms of Team stats, as well as some projections.

Offense:
Plays Per Game: 92.5, #6 in the country (trailing UL-Monroe, Marshall, LA Tech, Houston, Oregon)
PPG: 35.0, #24
YPG: 525.5, #19
Yards Per Play: 5.7, #45
3D Conv%: 54.05%, #13
RZ Scoring%: 100%, #1
Rush Play %: 38.38%, #105
YPC: 3.6, #76
Rushes/Game: 35.5, #68
Rush Yards/Game: 129.5, #78
Pass Play%: 61.62%, #18
Completion%: 66.67, #32
Yards/Pass: 7.1, #56
Passes/Game: 55.5, #6
Pass Yards/Game: 396.0, #6
Int Thrown%: 2.70%, #78
QB Sacked%: 2.63%, #49
TO Margin/Game: -1.5, #93
TOP%: 51.58%, #46

Defense:
PPG: 42.0, #102
YPG: 391.0, #58
Yards Per Play: 5.5, #68
3D Conv%: 42.31%, #73
4D Conv%: 20.00%, #26
YPC: 5.2, #92
Rush Yards/Game: 191.0, #79
Completion%: 72.58%, #112
Yards/Pass: 6.5, #44
Pass Yards/Game: 200.0, #39
Int Thrown%: 1.61%, #63
Sack %: 10.14%, #14

Some interesting numbers here. First off, on offense. Right now, our passing game is deadly. Just deadly. We're putting up a LOT of numbers, and while yards per pass play aren't very high, with our high volume it's not quite the issue it used to be. Nassib is in the Top Third for completions, which is good because that means the low yards per pass play stat isn't an issue. However, our running game is not efficient at all. While we're low, like bottom 10% low on run balance, due to our plays per game we're middle of the road in terms of our rushes per game. Thing is, our average yards per carry is atrocious. Most of the blame here goes to Jerome Smith, who has the most carries by far and the worst YPC stat (worse than Ashton, better than Nassib but Nassib is a QB so that's not a consolation. Going on, we have a very high number of interceptions per attempt (2.7 per 100 attempts) but our line is decent so far (only 2.63 sacks per 100 drop backs). That means that only 5% of our pass plays have a negative result. So, no surprise we pass so much more than we run.

Now, on defense, things get interesting. We have some awful stats, and some great stats, and stats that make no sense. First off, our PPG and YPG are bad. PPG blame lays at the feet of special teams more than defense, but it still can be better. YPG is right on the cusp of poor, and could be better. Yards per play is in the same area as YPG, and we need to stop more 3rd Down conversions. However, we are EXCELLENT at stopping 4th down conversions. The defense steps up when it has to in that case. We're poor against rushing though, very poor. Too many yards per carry, and too many yards per game. Moving on, is pass defense, which is weird. We're AWFUL at stopping completions. Just awful, we're almost in the bottom 10 in teams for that stat. However, IN SPITE of that, we're good at allowing very few yards per pass completion, and we're very good at now allowing a lot of passing yards per game. So, very weird with the pass defense. We could stand to pick off more throws, we're middle of the road there. And finally, while most people here have been down on the DL a little bit, statistically we're one of the best pass rushing teams in the country, and we get a sack on 10% of passing drop backs.

Now, on to some projections:

Right now, we're projected to go 4.6-7.4. Projections aren't kind to us at the moment (it cares way too much about W-L in projecting the future), though the site I use doesn't have a good projection formula anyways. We have a 33% chance of bowl eligibility, and we're projected to go 3-4 in conference right now. We have a 4.9% chance of winning the conference. Here's a breakdown of our remaining games. See you next week.

Toughest Remaining Games
DateOpponentLoc
Win Odds​
11/3 Cincinnati Away
16.7%​
11/17 Missouri Away
17.1%​
10/27 S Florida Away
23.0%​
10/13 Rutgers Away
33.1%​
11/10 Louisville Home
45.5%​

Easiest Remaining Games
DateOpponentLoc
Win Odds​
9/15 Stony Brook Home
99.1%​
10/5 Pittsburgh Home
77.1%​
9/22 Minnesota Away
52.2%​
10/19 Connecticut Home
49.3%​
11/23 Temple Away
45.9%​
 
This confirms my thinking that the defense is NOT very good, and my thinking that Shafer is over-rated as a DC.
 
This is awesome info, thanks. I'd love to see the numbers play out all season if you have the energy.
 
This confirms my thinking that the defense is NOT very good, and my thinking that Shafer is over-rated as a DC.

On the contrary, I think it looks well upon him. The issue is that the interior of the line is still young, which is not helping the run defense. And the pass defense, while it's not incredibly disruptive in breaking up plays, doesn't allow much yardage. If anything, the linebackers are letting the defense down, and that's not the coaches fault as all know what to do now. They're not properly containing on runs, and on pass defense they're not getting in the passing lanes.
 
Interesting stuff. However, when looking at any of SU's numbers through two games and attempting to draw conclusions and project performance going forward, it's important to remember who the opposition was in these two games.
 
Interesting stuff. However, when looking at any of SU's numbers through two games and attempting to draw conclusions and project performance going forward, it's important to remember who the opposition was in these two games.

True for some stats, but you can at least clearly see how the offense breaks down in terms of how it's run (92.5 PPG right now, 60-40 Pass to Run split)
 
the Ofensive PPG and YPG stats are very impressive when you factor in that just about every other team in the country has opened with at least one cream puff - if not two
 
True for some stats, but you can at least clearly see how the offense breaks down in terms of how it's run (92.5 PPG right now, 60-40 Pass to Run split)
I do hope those offensive trends continue but I'm reluctant to say they are written in stone. Let's see what happens when this team is playing with a lead against against supposedly softer opponents. So far this season they've been down by more than one possession a good deal of the time.
 
I do hope those offensive trends continue but I'm reluctant to say they are written in stone. Let's see what happens when this team is playing with a lead against against supposedly softer opponents. So far this season they've been down by more than one possession a good deal of the time.

The way I see it, if we're able to get so many points with our passing game playing from behind, why switch up the percentage? I mean hell, we still run 35 times a game.
 
How many teams have played 2 quality opponents already this year?? (including a QB and two WR's that will be 1st round draft picks).

those defense numbers will get better next week. (I hope)

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
 
How many teams have played 2 quality opponents already this year?? (including a QB and two WR's that will be 1st round draft picks).

those defense numbers will get better next week. (I hope)

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

They'll also get better when the special teams gets its head out of its ass.
 
They'll also get better when the special teams gets its head out of its ass.
And when SU doesn't have to face two of the best return men in the nation.
 
Those stats are mostly a reflection of our schedule. We have played two of the best offenses we will play all season and two of the more mediocre defenses we will face all season. USC has all of the offense in the world but I think their D while very talented is very very young... this isn't your older brothers USC D of Pete Carroll's heydey. I am impressed that our offense was able to do so well against BCS teams but I am curious to see if we can maintain it against more experience Ds that we will face come BE time.

I think our D will be much much improved come BE time. I think the answer to the OPs point about how our completion percentage against is very high but our YPC against is very low is pretty simple... both USC and NW used a lot of WR screens and quick slants to get the ball to their playmakers in space. Those passes are nearly impossible to stop so the big thing is to minimize the YAC and it looks like we have been doing that.

They key to the season is to make other teams sustain drives to score rather than scoring in less than 4 plays and to avoid giving other teams a short field. Do that and we should be in very very good shape if the offense holds up against stiffer competition.
 
Those stats are mostly a reflection of our schedule. We have played two of the best offenses we will play all season and two of the more mediocre defenses we will face all season. USC has all of the offense in the world but I think their D while very talented is very very young... this isn't your older brothers USC D of Pete Carroll's heydey. I am impressed that our offense was able to do so well against BCS teams but I am curious to see if we can maintain it against more experience Ds that we will face come BE time.

I think our D will be much much improved come BE time. I think the answer to the OPs point about how our completion percentage against is very high but our YPC against is very low is pretty simple... both USC and NW used a lot of WR screens and quick slants to get the ball to their playmakers in space. Those passes are nearly impossible to stop so the big thing is to minimize the YAC and it looks like we have been doing that.

They key to the season is to make other teams sustain drives to score rather than scoring in less than 4 plays and to avoid giving other teams a short field. Do that and we should be in very very good shape if the offense holds up against stiffer competition.


Great post--completely agree. Small data set coupled with disparate competition equals skewed numbers.

Czar, not a putdown--looking forward to seeing the data normalize over the course of the season. Very cool that you are doing this--I just don't agree with several of your interpretive conclusions [at this point] due to the above.
 
This confirms my thinking that the defense is NOT very good, and my thinking that Shafer is over-rated as a DC.
I think this post confirms that you are hopelessly stranded in the Land of Curmudgeon without a life raft or signal fire.
 
This confirms my thinking that the defense is NOT very good, and my thinking that Shafer is over-rated as a DC.

Maybe it's the Billy Mumphrey in me, but I think 391 yards per game is really good considering who we've played so far. I think that # will continue to trend down from here. The best offense we'll see is behind us. Northwestern's spread to open the season was no small task either.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
172,398
Messages
5,016,642
Members
6,027
Latest member
Old Timer

Online statistics

Members online
217
Guests online
6,720
Total visitors
6,937


...
Top Bottom