Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="newmexicuse, post: 2725058, member: 57"]
yes, it was a rare game that i got to see out that was not broadcast back east.

the jets started poorly w the powell fumble. it looked like it might seesaw for awhile, but the crowell long td changed the complexion. jets dominted both lines of scrimmage. huge holes for the running backs and crowell beat them into submission. the oline also protected sam well. they shut out von miller and chubbb and only allowed one sack, which was on a bad snap. the d line kept pressure on bortles all game williams was dom inent. several third down sacks that forced denver punts. probably half of bortles yards came right at the end in garbage time.

sam was a mixed bag. opposite of what i had previously seen. his long game was on fire, two gorgeous long tds to anderson, perfectly thrown balls. his third td to pryor was a so so pass and a great catch and run. his short game was terrible. completed less than 50% overall. several tipped passes including one that resulted in an int. looked like he was releasing low. he dis show his athleticism by catching at least three bad snaps that could easily have been fumbles. he also made a couple of key first downs on third and short sneaks.

opposite game for receivers, anderson terrific, enunwa was terrible. no catches and a couple of drops.

d was very solid overall. i think one cb had four passes defended, senior moment, i am forgetting who that was.

back to your original question. it wads close to a max game for the jets, except for the short passing game. denver did not look great, they were dominated, but they have already won twice, so i would like to think it was more about the jets playing very well.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?