Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="RF2044, post: 3578365, member: 40"] You are attributing WAY too much importance to playing on ST, which is what Clark did. Not saying that it isn't a valuable contribution, but it can't be disputed that he didn't crack the two deep in any meaningful way that resulted in PT. Maybe he would have played his junior year. He WAS projected to compete, as you suggest -- he was listed as the first team RT at the beginning of spring ball prior to that year, but lost his spot to I believe Red, who was a true frosh who'd been on campus for two months. Read what you will into how that translates to the prospects of him getting PT as an upperclassman -- which is why I use him as the example to make my point. He was a big warm body. [/QUOTE]