Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Zelda Zonk, post: 5337731, member: 966"] You’re confusing things. Criticism of a player is a different matter than challenging your hyperbolic assessment, an assessment that contradicts the statistics and also diminishes a current player. Asking for a source of your data, when it has been discussed that some of the websites are inaccurate, is not criticizing the player. Suggesting that a player might not be a “great shooter“ [yet] because he only shoots 29% from 3…in high school… isn’t saying he’s “bad,” it‘s more about disputing your “lightyears better” assessment, which I thought was “ridiculous.” Objectivity, friend. That’s all I’m after. And again—if you have access to better/different stats, please share them so maybe we can all get as super-pumped as you. [/QUOTE]