Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
One of the least-informed posts ever ...
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="suhoops4life, post: 466457, member: 1587"] Regardless of who is right to whatever shade of gray, the concensus is that SU is moving to the ACC primarily for football revenue, correct? For that to be happening, common sense would suggest there is an unwavering top/down admin commitment to the football program? To think of even spending the money necessary to switch conferences, how could the university not also anticipate & allocate the expenses (such as a modern practice facility recommended years ago) for providing a top 25 program? It sounds like switching conferences was considered before the notion of commiting the money necessary for a top 25 football program? Should it really be up to private donations to take care of practice facility expenses while the team is still struggling for respectability? Afterall, did the alumni allow the football program to crap out before HCDM? Not correctly figuring in the ROI from fair-weather alumni, as long term revenue rather than a source to be used for short term expenses would be a high stress strategy, IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
One of the least-informed posts ever ...
Top
Bottom