Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="IthacaBarrel, post: 4542257, member: 363"]
That is 100% what I am questioning.  The staffs in the back 1/2 to 1/3 of the recruiting rankings all have limitations in one form or the other.  They are pouring through film of countless kids I am sure.  All trying to get kids that fit their scheme and or program but also being realistic with what kids they can actually get. I would say those that do that best and develop these kids for what they were recruited for obviously have more success. But to get caught up on ranking #43 versus #61 like that actually means a GD thing is just so dumb to me.  One guy says 3 star but they really don't know how certain kids will progress and where they will be in 3 years.  Nobody really does.  I guess I just don't get it.  Computer rankings can only tell you so much.  The best schools get the best rankings because they are the best schools and their offers influence how they are evaluated.  And again, I am talking classed from say 35-40 through 80 and the further you get away from the top 10 it gets murkier. Syracuse will always be somewhere in the gray area
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?