Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="shantydaze, post: 1624563, member: 666"] Why would the ACC want any more partial members? I was and am not a fan of the ND deal. While I understand the argument that its inclusion opened better bowls and could increase television money, what more could Texas add that FSU and ND have not already brought? I have always thought partial memberships weakens a conference and the perception of that conference. Why be the conference that pulls its pants down and turns around for a ND or UT? Especially, if your tin-foil conspiracy theories regarding the B1G punishing the ACC for ND are correct (although here in B1G country, the word is the B1G has moved on after being publicly jilted twice). I like the idea of rotating divisions. Yes, it may cost some schools an annual rivalry, but strengthening the conference should be more important. [/QUOTE]