Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="RF2044, post: 1440883, member: 40"]
No, I don't deny that.  But I think that times have changed from the 1700s, and that the best way to dispense with discrimination based upon difference is to, you know, not discriminate based upon difference.

Cantor was terrrible--not because of what she stood for, but because how she implemented what she stood for was so incredibly poorly implemented, and was so diametrically opposed to operational best practice.  It would be a different conversation if her fringe programs didn't adversely impact the university's national ratings, but they did.

Feeling positively about a cause--whichever side of the political spectrum you identify with--doesn't offset poor performance.  And Cantor ran the university into the ground, from a ratings standpoint.  Not sure that this can be objectively disputed.

So whether you agree with her politics are not is irrelevant.  As is myopically pretending that criticism of Cantor has anything to do with her ontological perspectives instead of her horrendous managerial aptitude and road to nowhere "leadership."
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?