Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 5005189, member: 1969"] I wouldn’t change the quad system back to top 50, top 100. I would keep it the same as now — I don’t see it as the problem here. The underlying rankings that feed the quad groups are. The quad system to me is much better now — road games are much harder and I am fine with the quads being extended or shortened for that. Also allows for more q1 and q2 oops for mid majors via road games — although that has been negated by power conferences getting more opps as well. I would change the factor in NET that seemingly gives extra value to road wins. Inherently efficiency systems already adjust for road / home to begin with, so it’s double counting in my view — my guess is the NET expands the value of margin variances from expectation on the road by 40%. Bring that back to flat. But 50/50 would solve lots of things. I won’t run all the quad records but I will show what the new NET/RPI hybrid would look like this year. [/QUOTE]